UK Casino Review

Name: UK Casino Review
Item: UK Casino
Rating: 9.1
Author: Zuzana R

Players from Virginia Not Accepted

9.1 Reputation
rating

Visit Casino

Perfect

Reputation

Author: Matej Novota | This review was last updated: 2020-05-04T00:00Z

We've thoroughly reviewed UK Casino and gave it a perfect reputation rating, which is the best rating any casino can get from us. In our review, we've considered the casino's player complaints, estimated revenues, license, games genuineness, customer support quality, fairness of terms and conditions, withdrawal and win limits, and other factors. UK Casino is related to other online casinos listed below and its rating is also positively influenced by them. Read the full review below and learn more about this casino.

According to our research and estimates, UK Casino is a smaller online casino revenue-wise. The revenue of a casino is an important factor, as bigger casinos shouldn't have any issues paying out big wins, while smaller casinos could potentially struggle if you manage to win really big.

We currently have 0 complaints directly about this casino in our database, as well as 17 complaints about other casinos related to it. Because of these complaints, we've given this casino 659 black points in total, out of which 659 come from related casinos. You can find more information about all of the complaints and black points below.

Based on all of the information mentioned in this review and our perfect reputation rating of this casino, we can conclusively say that UK Casino is a great place to play. If you are looking for a perfect online casino, we recommend trying out this one.

Complaints about UK Casino and related casinos (17)

We have conducted extensive research on the web and as a result we have found following 17 complaints on UK Casino or any brands that might be interconnected with it. Taking into account seriousness and credibility of these complaints and estimated size of casino revenues we decided to give UK Casino a Perfect reputation.

Complaints on related 21.co.uk Casino (Same owner)

Failed self-exclusion

Black points: 105 (10 for this casino)

The player's account was locked due to a self-exclusion.

The player made a deposit of £100, took a 100% bonus and after completing the wagering requirements, he requested a withdrawal. He had provided all the documents needed for the account verification but later on, his account was locked due to a self-exclusion. No further information is available.

Disputed amount: £830 (real money)

This complaint is from 3/2015

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Delayed payment, status unknown

Black points: 0

Extremely long withdrawal process for no reason provided by the casino.

Rollanumber97 sent all the documents needed for verification to the casino and requested a withdrawal which kept on being in a pending mode for a while. No further update is available ever since then.

Disputed amount: £400 (real money)

This complaint is from 5/2014

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Complaints on related Pink Casino (Same owner)

No reaction policy, good regulator

Black points: 208 (20 for this casino)

The player's winning was confiscated due to a multiple breached rules of the casino.

The player registered and accepted a welcome bonus offer. Shortly after that they won, requested a withdrawal and sent all the documents requested by the casino for verification. The next day they received an email where the casino informed the player about confiscating their winning due to multiple broken rules. The player filled the complaint and the casino never responded to it where the ThePOGG recommended asking the ADR service eCORGA for help. Ever since then there is no update available about this case.

Disputed amount: £3,577 (bonus money)

This complaint is from 10/2016

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Complaints on related Slot Boss Casino (Same owner)

Failed self-exclusion

Black points: 2600 (260 for this casino)

The player's winning was confiscated due to a self-exclusion at the sister's casino.

Dan requested a withdrawal of £5,000 but it was denied due to a previous self-exclusion at the casino's sister site, Pink Casino. The casino decided to keep the winning and the deposit, too. The player claimed that he did pass the verification so why wouldn't they pay him what he deserved. The ThePOGG recommended Dan to ask for the help of a gaming authority. Unfortunately, the case was not resolved and it stayed open.

Disputed amount: £5,000 (real money)

This complaint is from 8/2017

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Failed self-exclusion

Black points: 318 (31 for this casino)

Account closed due to a multiple accounts holdings.

The player had an old account where he self-excluded himself from a few years ago. He tried to reopen it by contacting the casino without a response. He decided to open a new one, sent the documents for verification and while waited for the approvement, he played and won NOK6,500. He requested a withdrawal and the casino found out about his old account with them. Due to the breach of terms and conditions of having two accounts, the account went under the review. After it was reviewed, the casino informed the player about being warned previously about creating more than one account with them. The player claimed that if they would´ve reopened his old account, he would´ve never opened a new one. The casino decided the accounts would remain closed due to having multiple accounts and they wouldn't pay the player his winnings. There is no further information on this case.

Disputed amount: 6,500 kr (real money)

This complaint is from 3/2018

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Show 1 similiar complaints with 318 black points in total (31 for this casino)

Insufficient evidence from casino

Black points: 970 (97 for this casino)

Duplicate accounts accusation, account closed and all funds seized.

The player requested a withdrawal of SEK18,000 and was asked to verify the documents. When the player called the support to ask which documents needed to be verified he was informed that there has been a mistake and the account will be closed due to multiple accounts registered under his name. After he received an email from the finance department about it, he asked them if both accounts were verified and they answered with "no". He also wanted to see a proof of double accounts but that was denied. The casino claimed that they have checked his accounts thoroughly and that he won't receive his deposit and the accounts would remain closed permanently. There has been no further information on this case.

Disputed amount: 18,000 kr (real money)

This complaint is from 12/2017

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

No reaction, good regulator

Black points: 223 (22 for this casino)

The account has been locked for months due to a security check.

The player's account was blocked for a few months due to a security check, but the player did receive his payment of €600. The player said the situation was embarrassing for him. He sent tens of emails, phone calls and live chats with no luck of getting an answer from the casino. There is no further information on the case.

Disputed amount: €600 (bonus money)

This complaint is from 6/2018

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

No reaction, good regulator

Black points: 82 (8 for this casino)

The player's account was blocked without an explanation given.

The player complained that they made a withdrawal request but later on found out their account was blocked. Many contact attempts with the casino had been made to no avail. The player didn't receive any explanation as to why their account got locked or what was wrong with the withdrawal request as all the documents needed for verification were submitted. No reaction from the casino, no more update on this case.

Disputed amount: £120 (bonus money)

This complaint is from 12/2018

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Show 1 similiar complaints with 82 black points in total (8 for this casino)

Delayed payment, likely paid

Black points: 100 (10 for this casino)

Delayed withdrawal process.

A player from India complained their withdrawal request wasn't processed within the indicated timeframe. When this issue arose with the casino, the player didn't receive any update so they created a complaint. The casino reacted to it and asked the player to send them a direct email. No more update since then.

Disputed amount: 150,000 INR (bonus money)

This complaint is from 6/2019

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Uncertain case, good regulator

Black points: 50 (5 for this casino)

Duplicate accounts, terms and conditions breached, all funds were seized.

The player requested a withdrawal and shortly after that he provided the documents for verification, He received an email that stated that he had multiple accounts and could have reopened the old account. But because he didn't have access to the old email address anymore, he couldn't do so. The other account was opened by his ex-wife with his information and her email address. The casino decided to close his account, kept the funds, but left the ex-wife's account open. There is no further information on this case.

Disputed amount: $4,000 (real money)

This complaint is from 2/2015

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Uncertain case, good regulator

Black points: 30 (3 for this casino)

The account was closed and all funds were seized.

Dave, a long time player from the UK, had his account verified where he had to prove a lot of his information that would allow him to deposit huge sums. After he passed the verification, he was rewarded £5,000 in real money and £5,000 in bonus money. Shortly after that, he received an email about his account being under the review for 7 days due to irresponsible gambling. Seven days passed and his account was still blocked. Dave tried to contact the casino via phone calls and emails with no luck. Finally, he received an email where he was asked to verify that he didn't take money directly from this company where he owned a share and that he took money from his smaller company that invoiced his larger company. The casino never responded to Dave about the last verification. There is no further information on this case.

Disputed amount: ?? (real money)

This complaint is from 7/2018

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Uncertain case, good regulator

Black points: 16 (1 for this casino)

Problematic withdrawal process.

The player wanted to make a withdrawal via their new bank account but the casino refused it because it was not verified and the player was told to request the withdrawal to his old bank account. However, the old bank account was closed and they were advised to change the bank account info via a tab in the account. However, when the player tried to access it, they always got an error message. The casino kept telling the player the issue was sent to the relevant department and that they would get back to them once they'd solved this. About six weeks later, there was no progress on this issue and the player lost all the hope about getting paid so they gambled away the remaining funds and said they would never play at this casino again. No further comment is available since then.

Disputed amount: $250 (bonus money)

This complaint is from 1/2019

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Uncertain case, good regulator

Black points: 1

Casino refused to close the player's account permanently.

The player tried to close the account permanently but he kept receiving different answers from the support team. He had two options which one of them was to self-exclude himself or just simply close the account where he would be able to reopen it anytime he wished to. He didn't wish to be self-excluded because he didn't have a gambling problem and didn't want to have a bad reputation at the other casinos. But after exchanging multiple emails with the casino, casino decided to self-exclude him because this option was permanent. There is no further information on this case.

Disputed amount: ?? (bonus money)

This complaint is from 5/2015

Read more on: askgamblers.com

Read more

Show 3 similiar complaints with 47 black points in total (5 for this casino)

Show more complaints (+5)

Have you found a relevant complaint about this casino, or do you have personal bad experience? Help others and submit your complaint.

* We only list complaints, where the casino might be breaking our Fair Gambling Codex.

UK Casino Bonus

10 FREE SPINS on Book of Dead

9.1

/10

Perfect Casino reputation reputation

Registration No Deposit Bonus - UK Casino

Not Available in Virginia

Value per spin: £0.1
Wagering requirements: 1x
Getting this bonus is LITTLE TIME-CONSUMING
Maximal cashout: £50
Full Terms apply
New players only
Wagering requirements must be fulfilled within 3 days
18+, www.begambleaware.org
Register a valid credit/debit card to claim this bonus

More Details Less Details

Available for following countries:

Submit documents for
ID VERIFICATION

Visit Casino

Bonus works

Bonus doesn't work

100% up to £250

9.1

/10

Perfect Casino reputation reputation

1st Deposit Bonus - UK Casino

Not Available in Virginia

Minimal deposit: £20
Wagering requirements: 40x bonus
Live table games contribution to Wagering Requirements: 30%
You should get this bonus almost INSTANTLY
Deposits of £20, £50, £100, £150 £200 or £250 will be matched with a cash reward of the same value as per the breakdown below: i. Deposit £20-£49 = £20 cash reward ii. Deposit £50-£99 = £50 cash reward iii. Deposit £100-£149 = £100 cash reward iv. Deposit £150-£199 = £150 cash reward v. Deposit £200-£249 = £200 cash reward vi. Deposit £250+ = £250 cash reward
Bonus is valid for 7 days
Full Terms apply
New players only
18+, www.begambleaware.org

More Details Less Details

Available for following countries:

Visit Casino

Bonus works

Bonus doesn't work

UK Casino Payment methods

Payment Method	Deposit Limits & fees	Withdrawal Limits & fees	Withdrawal Time
VISA	£10 - £5,000	£10 - ?	3 - 5 days
Mastercard	£10 - £5,000	Not Available	-
VISA Debit	£10 - £5,000	£10 - ?	3 - 5 days
PayPal	£10 - £5,000	£10 - ?	-
VISA Electron	£10 - £5,000	£10 - ?	3 - 5 days
Bank transfer	Not Available	-	-