RingMaster Casino Review

The player won A$10,000 on May 22nd, 2019. All documents and withdrawals have been accepted and approved by the casino, but she only received A$2,480 and is still waiting for the rest. The issue was successfully resolved.

The player from the United States had requested a withdrawal three weeks prior, with one approval for $2500 on 8/29. Despite being informed that it was marked as a priority and would take 3-7 days, there had been no update or response from the casino after multiple inquiries. The issue was resolved when the casino confirmed that the final payment had been issued to a third-party payment provider for disbursal, and the player subsequently received all his winnings. The complaint was marked as 'resolved' in the system after confirmation of receipt.

The player from Indiana had requested three withdrawals over the past three weeks, totaling $6,251. Despite providing all required documents for verification and having the payments approved, she was told that the withdrawals were pending final steps, with no clear explanation provided. We contacted the casino to clarify the status of the payments, and the casino confirmed that the last withdrawal was processed and pending transfer. After continued delays and communication, the player finally received her last payment, resolving the issue.

The player from Minnesota had requested a withdrawal which had been delayed for 2 weeks. Despite completing the requested verification process and having regular exchanges with the casino, the $700 payout via Bitcoin had yet to be processed. The Complaints Team facilitated communication between the player and the casino, resulting in the casino approving and expediting the payment. The player later confirmed receipt of the funds, resolving the issue.

The player from the US had experienced a delay in the processing of his bitcoin withdrawal of $335.21. The withdrawal request had been placed more than a month ago, but the online casino had not provided any definitive timeline or updates despite multiple inquiries from the player. After the complaint had been lodged, the casino responded stating that the withdrawal had been approved at $133 after deducting the provided bonus of $202. The player later confirmed receipt of two payments totaling $117.60, suspecting the difference from the approved amount was due to a processing fee. We had confirmed the possibility of a processing fee and marked the complaint as resolved after the player had received his funds.

The player from Ontario had been trying to withdraw his winnings, originally from a no-deposit bonus, since September 2023. Despite having followed all promotional rules and ensured the correct usage of the bonus, the casino kept delaying the payout, giving a waiting period of 2-10 business days each time. After the player's complaint, we asked the casino to provide an update on the status of the player’s withdrawal request. The casino representative had confirmed the player's Bitcoin address and escalated the withdrawal for payment. The player had then confirmed receipt of his funds, and we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States had followed all the necessary steps to play through a bonus and cash out. However, her withdrawal of $120 had not been approved despite assurances from a casino representative. After the player raised a complaint, we had facilitated communication between her and the casino. The casino had requested additional documentation and confirmation of the player's Bitcoin address. The player had expressed concern about the safety of sharing her Bitcoin address and the history of her withdrawal requests being cancelled. We had assured her that her Bitcoin address would only be visible to us and the casino. Eventually, the player received her payment and expressed gratitude for our assistance. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from Germany had requested a withdrawal from the casino a month ago, but had not received the funds. The player had confirmed that he had met the sales requirements for a no deposit bonus and had deposited $10 in Bitcoin to verify the payment method. This had been his first time playing at this casino and he had not redeemed any bonuses before. The casino had responded that players from Germany were not allowed to cash out on free welcome chips but mentioned a recent Bitcoin transfer of $24. The situation had been reviewed by the casino's relevant department. The complaint had eventually been resolved successfully.

The player from Alaska has been waiting for his withdrawal for two weeks, and suspects the casino might refuse to pay. He is dealing with multiple withdrawals, and even though a couple are approved, he has not received any payment.

The player from Poland won $100 from a free chip but has been unable to contact the casino despite submitting all the required documents. The player confirmed the case was resolved, so we closed it accordingly.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal more than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. The issue has been resolved successfully.

The player from Indiana had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hadn’t been received yet. We contacted the casino and found out that 2 of 3 withdrawal requests were already processed, and the third one was about to be approved by the casino. After several days, the player confirmed receiving their winnings in full amount, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player's account had been verified, and the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

The player from United States has requested a withdrawal more than three weeks ago. It has been pending since. Even if we’ve assumed that the issue has been resolved, without a confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint. The player contacted us once more, stating that the issue was not resolved, therefore we reopened this complaint to give it one more chance. The player got payed and the case is resolved.

The player from California had won a jackpot of $720 at Royal Ace casino on August 20 and had requested a withdrawal, which had not been processed a month later despite being told it would take 7-10 business days. After contacting the Complaints Team, it was confirmed that the payment had been sent to a third-party provider, and the player was informed that the transaction was forthcoming. Ultimately, the player confirmed that the withdrawal had been successful, and the issue was marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.

The player from Alabama had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hadn’t been received at that time. The Complaints Team had advised the player to wait at least 14 days after requesting their withdrawal before submitting a complaint. After two weeks, the player confirmed that he had received his payout of $50, which was the maximum payout for the no deposit bonus he had used. The issue had been resolved successfully and the complaint had been marked as 'resolved' by the Complaints Team.

The player from Texas has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States is having issues with login and withdrawal. After a deposit of $125, a software glitch prevented the player from accessing the game. Despite multiple password resets and emails to the support, the issue persists. Additionally, the casino has not processed a pending withdrawal of winnings worth $2500 despite numerous document submissions. The player later informed us that her winnings have been paid, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States faced issues with withdrawing money from the casino. Despite the rule stating a minimum cash out of $100 for monthly cash back, she received only $20, with the casino citing the use of Coindraw as the reason. The player questioned if different withdrawal methods had different rules and experienced delays in getting responses from customer service. The issue was resolved after the casino provided the remaining balance, allowing the player to put it back in withdrawal. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Puerto Rico had struggled to withdraw her winnings from the casino for several months, despite having provided necessary documents repeatedly. The casino had continuously denied the payout due to supposedly missing documents. The withdrawal had eventually been approved on April 12, but the funds were not sent until May 11. After the player confirmed the receipt of her funds, we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States had tried to make a withdrawal but was informed about missing documentation. Even though he provided all the requested documents, the casino kept asking for more information. The player had won the money without an active bonus. After the Complaints Team intervened, the Casino's Representative had confirmed that the player's account and bank transfer details were correct and that the withdrawal of $300 had been approved. However, the amount had included a non-cashable deposit bonus of $142, leaving the player with $158 to withdraw. This had been escalated for express disbursal. The player later confirmed receipt of the payment, and the complaint had been resolved.

The player from Kansas had requested two separate withdrawals from Slots Garden, totalling $2400. The casino had initially refused to pay her through Bitcoin, her preferred method because she hadn't deposited with Bitcoin. The casino had requested her bank details for a wire transfer, but later stated they couldn't send the money to her bank. The player had been unwilling to change her bank or open a second account to receive her winnings. After the intervention by us, the casino released the first portion of the withdrawal via Bitcoin and expedited the remaining payment. The player had confirmed receipt of her winnings and the issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from California had had an issue accessing her Slots Garden casino account via Inclave after accumulating about $1,400 in winnings. She had been unable to get in touch with Slots Garden or Inclave and had suspected foul play due to sudden device problems. We had to reject the complaint due to the player's lack of response to our messages and questions. However, the player later confirmed that the issue had been resolved.

The player from the United States had had issues withdrawing her $400 winnings from an online casino. Despite having submitted the required identification multiple times, her withdrawal had remained "in process" for over three weeks. The casino had clarified that the approved withdrawal amount was $130, accounting for a bonus and account confirmation deposit. Eventually, the player had received $116 of her winnings. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player was facing issues with withdrawal. She had requested a payout of 880$ in Bitcoin, her payment method during the deposit. However, despite approval from the manager, the Bitcoin withdrawal was denied. It turned out it was a no-deposit bonus with a maximum cashout of $100 and a country restriction issue. Later, the complainant informed us that her issue was sorted out. The complaint is resolved.

The player from California has encountered problems with his withdrawal process despite verifying his account three times. He was promised a timeframe of 7 to 10 days which has extended, while communication with the casino remains the same. The issue of loyalty bonus limit was also raised. The complaint was resolved as the player's money got paid out.

The player from the United States had reported a delay in his withdrawal request since August 2nd. Despite having adhered to the casino's rules, his withdrawal request had remained unprocessed. He had confirmed that he was not a bonus abuser, as he had made numerous deposits and losses. The Complaints Team had asked for screenshots of his bonus and cashier histories for further investigation. Eventually, the player had confirmed that he received his payment from Slots Garden. We had closed the complaint as 'resolved', and had directed the player to open a separate complaint for another issue with Lucky Legends Casino.

The player from Virginia successfully beat the stipulated playthrough limit and requested a withdrawal. The casino requested a KYC process and a deposit of $10 in Bitcoin for address proof. While the player complied, their withdrawal request was later revoked due to casino's issues with CoinDraw. The player is unsettled about the additional waiting period stated by customer service and believes it's time for third-party intervention. We closed the complaint as resolved since the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

The player from the US requested four separate withdrawals using Bitcoin, but after two weeks, the requests were canceled and the money returned to their balance. Despite being assured that their issue would be resolved, the player hasn't received any specific support and the issue remains unresolved. The issue has been resolved successfully.

The player from South Africa had their withdrawals withheld and account blocked. The casino discontinued it's South African version, however they were able to process the withdrawal for the player and the complaint is resolved.

The player from South Africa was dissatisfied with the long withdrawal process and the casino’s support wasn’t helpful after inquiring about his withdrawal. The complaint was resolved. The player received his winnings nearly 3 months later, with unexpected fees deducted by one of the banks processing the payment.

William, a player from South Africa, won from a no deposit bonus and he is stuck on the verification process. He also expressed his dissatisfaction with the casino’s support and services. This case was successfully resolved.

The player from the US faced withdrawal issues after winning a $300 no deposit bonus. Initially, his withdrawal request was delayed and extended beyond the promised timeframe, which led to his account being locked. He was unable to access the site and could not contact the casino regarding his $300 winnings. The issue was resolved after the casino confirmed that the player's withdrawal request had been approved, and the winnings were sent to his registered Bitcoin address. The player acknowledged receipt of the funds, and the complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from the US had reported multiple approved payouts via Bitcoin in one day. However, after she received one payment, she was notified that she couldn't use Bitcoin anymore and was required to opt for a wire transfer and submit additional documents. Despite her initial resistance to opening a new account for wire transfer, as she had been initially instructed to open a Bitcoin account, the issue was eventually resolved. The player confirmed that the matter had been taken care of, leading us to close the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Kansas had experienced issues with her withdrawal from Planet 7 Casino as the operator had refused payouts via BTC, wire transfer, and check. The only option proposed had been opening an account with two banks, both inconveniently located for the player. After the player had opened a bank account and informed the casino, she was told to wait for a month to get her winnings due to the absence of a bank statement. However, the casino then allowed her to withdraw her winnings via Bitcoin, which she had initially requested. The player had received her winnings and was waiting for a payout from the casino's sister company, Raging Bull Casino. The Complaints Team had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from California had reported that she had requested a withdrawal two weeks prior but had not received the payout despite it having been approved. She had claimed to have received various excuses from the casino and had been told to wait longer. The player's account had been verified, and she had fulfilled her wagering requirements. She had also reported having daily, unproductive conversations with the casino. After we invited the casino representative to the conversation, the casino confirmed that the payment had been processed. The player had confirmed receipt of her winnings, albeit with some confusion due to unfamiliar emails. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Australia has requested a withdrawal three weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Australia is dissatisfied with the withdrawal process. He has been waiting for weeks for his withdrawal. The issue was successfully resolved, the player's winnings were eventually paid.

The player from United States requested a withdrawal and after more than 3 weeks of waiting for the payment, she decided to submit a complaint. The player received the payment approximately 5 weeks after the withdrawal request. The complaint is resolved.

The player from the United States asked for a second withdrawal at the casino, via Bitcoin. After 3 weeks she did not receive payment and created a complaint. After the casino representative was involved in resolving the complaint, the complaint was resolved. The player received payment after more than a month.

The player from United States requested a withdrawal, but the casino did not process his withdrawal for several weeks. After the casino representative was involved in resolving the complaint, the process moved on and the player received payment, approx. 2 months after the withdrawal was requested.

The player from US has been waiting for his withdrawal for 3 weeks. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions. The player confirmed in his second complaint that he received the withdrawal.

The player from Italy had been waiting to receive his winnings for more than 7 weeks before he submitted the complaint. A few days later, the player confirmed he received his winnings. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from United States has requested withdrawals six weeks ago. They have been pending since. The complaint was resolved after the player received his winnings. Although, the player found the long withdrawal process as a negative experience and not planing to continue playing in the casino.

The player from the United States had requested a withdrawal of $2200 on July 17th, 2024, which was approved on August 1st, but had not been received yet. Despite multiple inquiries to live support and the finance department for updates, the player continued to receive vague responses and was eventually ignored. The issue was resolved as the player had received the payment.

The player from the United States had been waiting over 45 days for $1,260 in approved withdrawals to be processed via Bitcoin. Despite weekly interactions with the casino host, no payout had been received. After intervention from the Complaints Team, the player received $1,000 and subsequently the remaining $260. The issue was marked as resolved, and the player expressed gratitude for the support received.

The player from Texas requested a $100 withdrawal one month ago from their verified account, but it had not been processed despite approval on the 20th of May. They were frustrated with the casino's repeated delays and lack of adherence to posted withdrawal times. The casino confirmed that the payment was made on June 13th via Bitcoin, and the player acknowledged receipt. The complaint was marked as resolved by us after verifying the player's confirmation.

The player from the US queried a reversal on their recent winnings and asked for an explanation. The complaint was resolved after the Complaints Team contacted the casino multiple times. The casino cited delays from third-party payment providers due to high withdrawal volumes. Eventually, the player received partial payment and confirmed the successful resolution of the issue.

The player from the United States had requested a withdrawal of $2500 at the beginning of January and had not received a response, nor the funds two weeks later. Despite having confirmed that she had passed KYC verification and had successfully withdrawn before, the casino did not process her request. After the player had raised a complaint, we had contacted the casino, and the casino representative had claimed that the delay was due to the need for confirmation of the player's bank wire details. The player had provided the necessary information, and the casino representative stated that the withdrawal had been processed. After some additional delays, the player confirmed that she had received her withdrawal. The issue had been resolved successfully.

The player from Minnesota had experienced a payout delay with two withdrawal requests. The casino's customer service had given a payout date, but had only stated that it would be updated in the next 48 hours. The player had confirmed that they had not made any successful withdrawals from the casino in the past, they had passed the KYC verification, and they had used bonuses for the winnings. The player was later able to receive the payouts, however, the casino had sent the funds to an old wallet address, not the updated one. We concluded that this likely happened due to the payment being in process for a long time, before the wallet details were updated. The issue was resolved then.

The player from Japan had encountered issues with withdrawing her funds from an online casino. Despite having submitted all necessary documents in July 2023, the casino had kept requesting the same documents. The player had several payouts pending from various casinos including Silver Oak Casino. After the Complaints Team got involved, the casino confirmed that the payment had been made in full via Bitcoin on January 16th. The player later confirmed that the issue had been resolved and the funds had reached her account. The Complaints Team had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from New Jersey has faced a delay with his withdrawal, requested over three weeks ago. Although he complied with max cash out regulations and KYC requirements, he hasn't received his payment. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.

The player from Florida has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. We contacted the casino, and it turned out the bank statements were missing to verify the player's payment method. The delay in communication between the player and the casino was also caused by the issues with email addresses, however, the casino representative finally informed us about reviewing the document. The player was asked to submit a new withdrawal request, and after some time they confirmed receiving the winnings, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from Oklahoma has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. When we contacted a casino representative, it turned out some documents were missing and the communication with the player was complicated due to some outdated contact details. Finally, the withdrawal via wire trasnfer was processed by the casino. There were still a little delays caused by the 3rd party payment provider issues, but the player confirmed receiving her funds in the end. We closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the US was informed that the loyalty bonus was credited falsely and the casino decided to withhold the accumulated winnings. The issue was successfully resolved. The casino aknowledged the mistake and the player got paid.

The player from United States requested a withdrawal and after 14 days of waiting for the payment, he decided to submit a complaint. The player received the payment 1 month after the withdrawal request. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Argentina had won $100 in a tournament and had met the wagering requirement, ending with $90. Despite having requested the removal of an unwanted $16 chip with a 40x wagering requirement, she faced trouble withdrawing the $90. The issue was resolved after the player confirmed her Bitcoin address, and she successfully received her funds.

The player from the US had requested a withdrawal two weeks prior. Despite having a verified account and assurances from the casino, no withdrawal had been processed. The player was dissatisfied with the delay beyond the promised timescale. The issue was resolved after the casino sent the payment. The complaint was closed as ‘resolved’ in our system.

The player from the US had experienced issues with a withdrawal from an online casino. After meeting a playthrough amount of 6,000 dollars, the player had been left with a 100 dollars max cash out, which the casino initially refused to pay. Despite fulfilling verification requirements and making a mandatory deposit, the player had not received a response about the withdrawal request. We had engaged with both the player and the casino to understand and resolve the issue. The casino had identified that the withdrawal was denied due to a lack of payout details. The player then resubmitted the withdrawal request with the necessary details. The casino confirmed that the payment had been processed and delivered via Bitcoin. The player confirmed the receipt of the payment, thus resolving the issue.

The player from Japan had had issues with prolonged withdrawal delays from Slot Madness Casino, despite having provided the necessary documents. The player had not received any updates from the casino's finance manager. After the player's complaint had been escalated and the casino had been invited to respond, the casino had confirmed that the payment had been issued to their third-party payment providers for disbursal as a wire transfer. The player later confirmed that the issue had been resolved and the funds had been received. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. We contacted Slot Madness, and the casino representative helped the player to figure out why the verification process was stuck. After submitting the required documents, the player got his account verified and finally received the winnings. The complaint got resolved.

The player from United States had requested a withdrawal five months ago. Unfortunately, it has not been received yet. The complaint was closed as resolved as the palyer received his winnings to his crypto wallet.

The player from Kansas had requested two withdrawals, both over $400, with the first one made on September 19. They could not access the casino's website due to password issues, which prevented them from checking the status of their withdrawals. The issue was resolved as the player received payments totaling $562.80, although they noted that the fees appeared high. The Complaints Team clarified that the fees were due to bonus fund deductions and a transaction fee, along with cryptocurrency market volatility. The complaint had been marked as 'resolved'.

The player from Texas requested a Bitcoin withdrawal on 08/14/2024, which remained unapproved despite her communication with the casino. While they claimed to escalate the issue, she received no resolution or response from a manager. After further inquiry, she confirmed receipt of her funds, although the amount was $1,910.86 instead of her expected $2,350 due to reversed charges on deposits. The issue was resolved with clarification from the casino regarding the deductions, and the complaint was marked as 'resolved' by the Complaints Team.

The player from the US had deposited $96 to Raging Bull Casino but could not access the website. Additionally, he had a $500 withdrawal pending. The complaint was rejected due to the player's lack of response to the Complaints Team's inquiries, which prevented any further investigation or potential solutions. The issue was later reopened at the player's request, where he clarified that he had approximately $350 remaining in his account but was unable to log in due to restrictions. The Complaints Team was seeking supporting evidence regarding the player's balance to assist in resolving the matter. Ultimately, the issue was resolved after the player communicated with the casino, confirming that his account had been re-activated and access restored. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from the United States had requested three Bitcoin withdrawals totaling $3,000 in winnings, which were approved between June and July 2024. Despite repeated promises from the casino host, the player had not received the funds after over 45 days. After engaging with the Complaints Team, the player received $2,250 of the outstanding amount, and further assistance led to the eventual payment of the remaining $750. The issue was resolved, and the player confirmed receipt of all funds.

The player from Argentina requested a withdrawal on June 26, but it remained unapproved and unreviewed as of July 16. Casino support cited an exceeded payment limit requiring further review. After our intervention, the casino confirmed that the player's account was in order, and the withdrawal was processed. The player acknowledged receipt of the payment, and the complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Texas had requested a withdrawal three weeks prior and faced ongoing issues with ID verification despite being told it was accepted. At that time, the casino claimed it couldn't verify the player's Bitcoin address due to the date of the withdrawal, causing further delays. There was also an issue with the maximum cashout of the bonus. After our intervention, the casino acknowledged a discrepancy in the bonus terms and agreed to review the payout situation. Ultimately, the player received $283 in Bitcoin, resolving the issue to her satisfaction.

The player from Massachusetts had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before submitting this complaint. The payment hadn’t been processed yet. We informed the player about typical withdrawal times and advised patience. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal had been received. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Ohio requested a $200 withdrawal on May 31st and had completed the verification process. Customer service repeatedly informed her that the issue was being escalated, but it took 48 business hours each time, causing ongoing delays. The player confirmed on June 13th that the withdrawal was approved and supposed to be sent to her bitcoin account, but she had not received it. After further communication, the player reported on June 27th that the money was received. We marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Florida had requested a withdrawal of $875 on the 15th, but it had not been reviewed or approved after two weeks. The player had won $1300 minus the coupon amount. After several follow-ups, the casino confirmed the payment was sent to a third-party provider, citing a 3-10 business day window for disbursal. Despite delays, the player reported receiving the payment eventually. The complaint was marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.

The player from Kansas had complained about a withdrawal delay from an online casino. Despite having provided all necessary documents and followed up via email and live chat, the casino had failed to resolve the issue and had requested further documentation. We had intervened and kept the complaint open until the player confirmed that the casino had agreed to wire his withdrawal. However, the casino then extended the waiting period for the payment approval. After further intervention from our side, the casino agreed to convert the player's withdrawal to Bitcoin for a one-time transaction. The player had confirmed the successful resolution and thanked us for our assistance.

The player from California had reported that he had requested a withdrawal two months prior, which was approved, but he had not received his funds. The casino had ceased communication. He had reached out to our Complaints Team for assistance. After our team's intervention and communication with the casino, the player confirmed that he had received his payment from Raging Bull Slots Casino. Consequently, the issue had been marked as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the US had faced an issue with verifying a virtual card required for her winnings withdrawal at Raging Bull Slots Casino. The Complaints Team had engaged with the casino and the player to better understand the issue. The casino had suggested the player to provide access to the digital wallet where the transaction of cards could be traced or alternatively screenshots with card numbers from the same wallet. Upon receiving this advice, the player had confirmed that her issue was resolved and requested for the complaint to be closed.

The player from Nebraska had experienced delays in receiving seven different withdrawals via wire transfer from Raging Bull Slots Casino. Despite two approvals, none of the funds had been received, with waiting times surpassing the previously mentioned frames. The player had feared these delays could lead to an indefinite waiting period. The Complaints Team had intervened, communicating with both the player and the casino, and the issue was gradually resolved. The player had received all the withdrawals from his original complaint. However, he was waiting for additional withdrawals from new winnings at that time. The player had expressed his appreciation for the assistance provided by the Complaints Team and Raging Bull Slots Casino.

The player from the Netherlands had experienced a delay in her withdrawal due to 'missing documents'. Despite having sent the documents multiple times, her withdrawal had remained pending for over six weeks. After a series of exchanges with the casino and the complaints team, it was discovered that the casino had not received her proof of address and a valid method of payout. The player then sent these details again, and the casino confirmed receipt. The player had since received most of her winnings but reported a portion still missing. Despite this, she opted to close the complaint due to fatigue over the process. The issue was considered resolved as the player had confirmed receipt of most of her funds.

An Arizona player requested a withdrawal six weeks ago that was approved but not received. The VIP support and department claims to have been notified, and all documentation is reported to be accurate and submitted. The player requests assistance with the prolonged delay. The complaint was resolved as the player finally received his payout from the casino.

The player from Louisiana had requested a withdrawal from an online casino and had experienced delays and a lack of communication from the casino. Despite the casino eventually having approved the withdrawal after the player's complaint, the funds were not received immediately. Our team had reached out to the player for updates, but the player did not respond, which led us to initially reject the complaint. However, upon reopening the complaint at the player's request, it was confirmed that the funds had been received. The issue was subsequently marked as resolved.

The player from the US had been waiting for three weeks for her withdrawal to be approved, despite the casino's Terms and Conditions having promised a 7-10 day timeframe. This issue remained unresolved despite multiple escalations. The player had confirmed that her withdrawal was approved but she had not yet received her payout. After our team's intervention and communication with the casino's representative, the player finally received her withdrawal. The complaint was then marked as resolved.

The player from the United States had reported an issue of not having received her approved Bitcoin withdrawal even after a month. Despite her consistent follow-ups, the withdrawal had remained pending. After her complaint was lodged, the casino resolved the issue and sent the pending Bitcoin withdrawal. The player had confirmed the receipt of her withdrawal, and the complaint was subsequently marked as 'resolved' by us.

This player from Indiana had experienced a delayed withdrawal of $600 that had been made on November 25th after three $20 deposits. The player had not made any withdrawals from the casino before and had deposited and withdrawn in Bitcoin. After 20 business days of waiting and no approval of the withdrawal, the player had contacted us. We had engaged with the casino representative who confirmed all was in place for the payment to be released. The player later confirmed receipt of the withdrawal. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from Ohio had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings hadn't been obtained up to that day. The player had previously made successful withdrawals and all her documents had been verified. The casino had approved her withdrawal but the funds were not deposited. After a series of communications, the casino requested the player's Bitcoin address to process the payment. The player had expressed dissatisfaction over the delay, comparing it to faster services in other casinos. After an extension of the resolution period, the player confirmed that she had received her withdrawal. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Kentucky had experienced technical difficulties while registering on the inclave platform, specifically when she was entering her birthdate. The player had been entering her birthdate in the month/day/year format instead of the required day/month/year format. After she changed the format, the player was able to successfully register her account. The Complaints Team has since marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States had experienced issues with depositing because a card, not owned by the player, had been associated with their account. She had requested to remove the card to allow for continued play and withdrawal capabilities. After some back and forth with the casino's representative, it had been confirmed that the card had been used for a deposit. However, the player had insisted she did not own the card and nobody else had access to her account. Eventually, the casino had agreed to remove and block the card from the player's account as a courtesy, resolving the issue. The player had been satisfied with the outcome and expressed her gratitude.