Club Player Casino Review

A player from Nevada had fulfilled all withdrawal requirements and provided the necessary documents but continued to face reasons not to get paid. The player accused the casino of being fraudulent. The player's account had been verified in January and she had played using a bonus code on top of her real money deposit. She initially attempted a withdrawal via Bitcoin, but was denied as she had never deposited using this method. She then tried a wire transfer, but this was also denied without explanation. The casino had requested her bank statements, which she viewed as an invasion of privacy. We had advised the player that providing bank statements was a common verification procedure. However, the player failed to respond to our messages and we had to reject the complaint due to lack of further information.

The player from Washington had been facing issues with withdrawals at an online casino. Despite having made two deposits, her withdrawal requests had been consistently denied and returned to the casino after a 14-day waiting period. The player also reported that she had been unable to cancel an active coupon, had been forced to meet play-through requirements, and had received inconsistent information about withdrawal times. The casino responded that the player's funds were mixed, which made them ineligible for withdrawal. Despite our efforts to mediate, the issue remained unresolved as the player's funds were indeed mixed according to the casino's rules.

The player from Texas had been struggling to withdraw from Club Player for the past month. Despite trying multiple withdrawal methods, they all, for some reason, had failed. The casino had advised to cancel and try different methods, thereby resetting the withdrawal timeframe. The player had contacted the complaints team who had requested additional information and invited the casino to join the conversation. The casino confirmed that payment had been made in full via Bitcoin. The player confirmed the receipt of the payment and the issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from South Carolina has been struggling to receive his withdrawal for a month. Despite numerous visits to the casino and being repeatedly told to come back in 48 hours, payment has not been sent yet. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.

The player from Arkansas had requested a withdrawal three weeks prior and had received approval from the casino manager. However, he hadn't received the funds and they no longer showed as pending in his account. The player had claimed to have redeemed a free spin bonus and deposited the required amount. The casino, on the other hand, had stated that the player used multiple free chips consecutively without deposit history, which was against their terms and conditions. The casino had provided evidence supporting their claim, which had been reviewed and confirmed by the Complaints Team. As such, the player's complaint had been rejected due to violation of the casino's terms and conditions.

The player from Japan had faced withdrawal issues with Club Player Casino for three weeks. Despite having submitted all necessary documents in July 2023, the casino had repeatedly requested the same documents and failed to provide an update on the withdrawal status. The verification process had begun in October 2023, and the withdrawal request for $1000 via wire transfer was approved on January 1. The complaint was initially rejected due to a lack of response from the player but was reopened upon their request. Eventually, the player confirmed that the casino had paid them, leading us to mark the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Arizona had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before submitting this complaint. Her money hadn't been received yet. We had advised her to wait for two full weeks for the withdrawal to be processed and to not cancel the withdrawal request as it could have caused further delays. Despite extending the complaint period twice and asking for additional information regarding her withdrawal history and KYC verification, the player did not respond. As a result, we were unable to further investigate the issue and had to reject the complaint.

The player from the United States had winnings of $45 from bonus spins. When attempting to make a withdrawal, they received back only their verification deposit of $11, without the winnings. The casino alleges that the winnings were acquired through free chips, not bonus spins. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Wisconsin had complained about poorly addressed deposit issues in the casino. The player had also reported not receiving a bonus, despite having contacted support multiple times. We had attempted to investigate the issue and extended the timer for the player's response. However, due to the player's lack of response to our inquiries, we were unable to proceed with the investigation. As a result, the complaint was rejected.

The player from South Africa requested a withdrawal more than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, he played with a no-deposit bonus and after the his situation was reviewed we had to reject this complaint due to breach of the no-deposit rules.

The player from Utah fulfilled the wagering requirements and attempted to withdraw winnings but was told he needed to be verified. He sent the required documents on July 26, 2023, but has not received a response from the casino’s support team despite repeated attempts. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the United States has been trying to withdraw winnings of $120.72 for over a week but has not been able to reach customer service by phone, email, or live chat. She is also experiencing difficulty in making a Bitcoin deposit to verify her account. After investigation, it came to light that the player has taken multiple no deposit bonuses without making any deposits between them. Therefore, the complaint has been rejected.

The player from the US won from a free bonus but was accused of redeeming the bonus multiple times. The casino provided us with the evidence supporting its claims. There was another account in the casino that was registered with the same physical address, from the same household, and used the same no-deposit bonus before. Although it indicated multiple accounts and bonus abuse, we asked the player about the details and requested additional information. However, the complaint was rejected because the player stopped responding to our messages and questions.

The player from the US requested withdrawals from a casino, but the withdrawals seem to have been misplaced. We ended up rejecting the complaint as the player stopped responding and the data suggests that the money was sent to an address entered by the player before it was changed.

The player from the US won from a bonus, but his winnings were confiscated. After a closer examination, we ended up rejecting this complaint as there is sufficient evidence the player has breached the casino's bonus terms and conditions by claiming multiple No deposit bonuses without a real money deposit between them.

The player ''YAZOOGUY'' raised a complaint concerning delayed withdrawals. The casino representative was cooperating and the casino was paying the withdrawals out. The player was missing 2 withdrawals but did not reply if the casino paid him the missing amount or not. Supposedly, the player was paid in full.

The player's unable to withdraw her balance as she registered from a restricted country. After some discussion, the casino and the player managed to come to an agreement and the complaint was resolved.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. We rejected the complaint because the player failed to comply with the casino's bonus T&Cs, specifically free bonuses, and breached the "bonus to deposit ratio".

The player from Tennessee has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the US was experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. We contacted the casino, the casino representative recommended to upload other documents and to make a verification deposit, then the account was verified and the player was able to withdraw her winnings. The complaint was closed as resolved.

The player from the US has been experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player struggles to withdraw his balance due ongoing verification. The complaint was rejected because the casino provided us with the relevant evidence showing that the bonus terms hadn't been met by the player in order to be eligible for withdrawal, along with the fact that the player breached the casino's T&Cs by providing fraudulent documents for verification.

The player from Arizona has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hasn’t been received yet.The casino representative reacted to the complaint, but we haven't received any response from the player so we were not able to proceed with resolving. The complaint was rejected.

The player from South Africa is complaining about the lengthy verification process. The complaint was rejected because the casino provided us with the relevant evidence of multiple accounts created by the player with the same personal data, using the free bonuses in all of them.

The player from the United States has been accused of opening multiple accounts. We analyzed the information received from the casino and came to a conclusion that the casino behaved in accordance with its terms, so we were forced to reject the complaint.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal. Unfortunately, the payment seems to be delayed. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings hadn't been received yet and the account seemed to be blocked. The casino responded and stated that they would look into the situation. Shortly after this, the player regained access to their account. The casino responded again and advised that the payment had since been made via bitcoin. The player confirmed this and so the complaint was resolved.

The player from United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his Free Chip winnings due to ongoing verification. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing account verification. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Spain is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his funds due to limited availability of payment methods. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Japan has requested a withdrawal six months ago. Unfortunately, the payment is still pending since. The casino informed us that the player breached the terms and conditions of the no deposit bonus he received. Even though we have agreed on compromise solution with the casino, the player stopped responding and we were forced to close the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from US isn’t satisfied with the casino’s services. The casino tried to guite the player to complete the verification process, however the player stopped responding and although we've assumed that the complaint was resolved, we were forced to reject it.

The player 'northridgemaster' won $100 playing with a bonus, but has been unable to make a withdrawal. He has tried to contact the casino repeatedly but had no response. The casino has also neglected to reply to the mediator.

The player from United States had her withdrawal delayed for almost three weeks and account seems to be blocked without further explanation. The complaint was rejected as the player created multiple accounts in the casino, thus breached their terms anad conditions.

The player from Austria has been experiencing difficulties withdrawing his No Deposit bonus winnings. Subsequently, his account was blocked. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from United States has requested withdrawals three months ago. They have been pending since. Player got the first part of winnings in form of installment, so we consider this case as resolved.

Player had been waiting for 2monts for his 100$ withdrawal. Every week casino canceled the withdrawal for a reason of missing documents. The player was completely sure that he had sent all the documents but the casino did not respond to his email. The casino responded at askgamblers that the withdrawal request was being processed. No more update since, it has probably been paid.

The player complained that 16 days after they had requested a withdrawal and sent all the necessary documents for verification, the casino was still not responding. The people from the forum told the player that they had been well aware of the reputation of the casino before they started to play there. There is no further information available.

The player complained the casino wouldn't approve his winning of 100$ that came from a free chip bonus. The casino said he had already had an account registered with them back in 2002 and had used a free chip bonus already. The player said that in 2002 he had a different address and didn't have a qualifying age to play. This is an uncertain case.

The player from Indiana had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting his complaint. His money hadn't been received yet. The Complaints Team had suggested that the delay could have been due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests, and had advised the player to wait at least 14 days before submitting a complaint. However, the player confirmed that he had received his payment on the third day after his withdrawal request. Consequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from California had reported a delay in receiving his Bitcoin withdrawal from an online casino. He had stated that the casino had approved his request, but he hadn't received the payment despite being a KYC verified user with previous successful withdrawals. The player later confirmed that he had received his payout, and the issue had been resolved. We had subsequently marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal three weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. After we contacted the casino, its representative promised to look into the matter to assist the player. In the next few days, the player informed about finally getting the payment, therefore we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from South Africa is complaining about the lengthy verification process. The casino replied and stated that they had received the documents and that the player's account was now verified. The casino further asked for a payment method to use to process the player's withdrawal. The player provided this, and after some time, received their payment. Consequently, the complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from United States had been waiting for her withdrawal for over a month before she submitted the complaint. The casino representative informed us the payment was processed and sent to the player's Bitcoin wallet. Two weeks later, the player confirmed she received the payment. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from United States has requested withdrawal a month ago. Unfortunately, the payment hasn’t been received yet. After some delays the player was able to receive her funds and the complaint is resolved.

The player from California had requested a withdrawal of $100 two weeks ago from Palace of Chance Casino, but had received no updates. Despite daily attempts to contact the support team, he had received no response and his access to live chat support was eventually blocked. His account had already been verified on February 15th, and he had made one deposit into the casino. He was informed on March 20th that his withdrawal request had been approved, but he was not paid out. After contacting the casino again, they had requested him to verify his account once more. Following the re-verification and our intervention, the player reported that he was finally paid out.

The player from the Netherlands had attempted to withdraw $500 over two separate transactions in January. After a month's delay, the $200 withdrawal had been denied without any clear reason, despite the player's multiple inquiries and repeated documentation submissions. The player had provided all necessary documents for account verification, including ID and proof of address. However, the casino had claimed they did not receive these documents and could not proceed without a valid method of payout. After a series of exchanges, the casino finally acknowledged the receipt of necessary documents and approved the withdrawal. The player had received part of her winnings but reported that some amount was still missing. Despite this, she had requested to close the complaint, expressing fatigue over the process.

The player from Washington had experienced an issue with a delayed $2000 payout. Despite having completed the necessary paperwork twice and having received approval for the payout, the player had not received their bitcoin withdrawal after 6 weeks and 15 days of waiting. After we had requested clarification from the casino and the player, the player confirmed receipt of their winnings. We had then marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the US has been experiencing a delayed withdrawal approval since submitting a request in June 2023. They provided all necessary verification documents, and despite receiving approval, their withdrawal was later denied without explanation. The player resubmitted a withdrawal request and was seeking help in resolving the issue. We got in touch with the casino representative, and after he checked the issue internally, the player was informed about her withdrawal finally processed from the casino's side. After that, they confirmed receiving the money, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from the US requested a withdrawal in April. It has not been processed yet. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully

The player from Japan was struggling to complete her account verification. We contacted the casino and got the information that the player hadn't added a valid payment method when requesting for a withdrawal. The player shared her Bitcoin address so the casino representative was able to add this to her account. The winnings were finally paid out, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from Texas has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player has confirmed receipt of the payment, so we closed this complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States has requested her first withdrawal almost one month prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Pennsylvania submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. The casino informed us they paid the winnings and the player. The player confirmed he received the winnings.

The player from Switzerland has requested a withdrawal three weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. The player has confirmed that he has received the payment, so the complaint was resolved.

The player from United States had been waiting for their two withdrawals to be processed for more than three weeks before submitting the complaint. Four weeks later, the player informed us that the withdrawals had been processed and successfully received. Sťažnosť bola uzavretá ako „vyriešená“.

The player from Texas had used a code to get 60 free spins with a max cash out of $100 at Prism Casino. After fulfilling all the requirements, the player had been left with $100 but the casino only paid $50. They later claimed that they had the wrong rules in the system. We had contacted the casino for clarification and they acknowledged an error on their part. An additional payment was issued and the player confirmed receipt of the full $100. The player had also expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's decision to change their status to 'skilled player' after the issue was resolved. The complaint had been marked as 'resolved' by us.

The player from South Carolina had had two missing withdrawal requests dating back to 11/27/2023. Despite having constantly communicated with the casino for a month, she had always been told to check back in 48 hours but ultimately no resolution had been provided. After the player's complaint, we had advised her to wait for another week for the second payment as the casino might have applied weekly/monthly withdrawal limits. The player later confirmed that all her payments had been received. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the United States is having trouble making a withdrawal. Despite being assured via live chat that there are no problems with the account, the funds keep being returned to the play account without any explanation or email notification from the casino. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from United States had been struggling to withdraw their winnings for three weeks before submitting the complaint. The complaint was resolved. The player received their winnings 2 months later.

The player from Texas won $4500 and capped at $2500 for withdrawal. Despite the withdrawal being approved and all verification requirements being met, the player was experiencing issues with finalizing the transaction. Later, the player confirmed that the withdrawal was successfully paid. The complaint is resolved.

The player from New York has been waiting for a withdrawal of $50 for two weeks. Despite contacting the casino several times and being assured the request was in the queue, the player's withdrawal request has not been processed. We got in touch with the casino representative and he promised to assist in the matter. A couple of days later, the player informed us that the winnings were received so the complaint was closed as resolved.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal more than one month prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player struggled to withdraw his balance as the casino is keep requesting new documents. After contacting the casino, we found out that the player's withdrawal has been finally approved and he successfully received the winnings so the complaint is marked as resolved.

The player from the United States had submitted a withdrawal request of $1000, which had been her first interaction with the online casino. Despite having provided all KYC documents and her Bitcoin wallet address, she hadn't received her winnings for over two weeks. The player had attempted to contact the casino multiple times through live chat and email, but to no avail. After submitting a complaint to the Complaints Team, we had contacted the casino on her behalf. The casino had responded, and the player was informed that her withdrawal had been approved. She had been told it would take an additional 7-10 days for the funds to be transferred to her Bitcoin wallet. Upon receiving her winnings, the player confirmed the successful resolution of her issue.

The player from California had been unable to withdraw his winnings of $2500 from the online casino. Despite having been a verified player and having made multiple attempts, his withdrawal request had been consistently denied. The player had faced similar issues with the casino's sister site in the past. Upon mediation by our Complaints Team, the casino had agreed to process the player's withdrawal via check. The player had confirmed the receipt of the check after a significant delay, marking the resolution of the issue.

The player from Texas had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings hadn't been obtained up until that day. After communicating with the casino, the player's withdrawal had been approved and a wire transfer had been initiated. However, the player had experienced delays in receiving the funds. We had advised the player to wait a few more days for the transaction to process. Eventually, the player confirmed that the funds had cleared in their account, resolving the issue.

The player from Texas had been unable to log into her Slots of Vegas account after she requested a withdrawal. After a series of exchanges, it had been revealed that her account was deactivated by the casino's security department. The player had used a deposit bonus to accumulate winnings, but due to the bonus being non-cashable, she wasn't eligible to withdraw the full amount. The casino had agreed to refund her initial deposit of $31. The player had confirmed receipt of the refund, which concluded the complaint. Throughout the process, we had mediated the communication between the player and the casino, facilitating a resolution to the issue.

The player from California had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, her winnings hadn't been received at that time. The player had provided all necessary information to the casino multiple times but hadn't received her withdrawal. Despite assurance from the casino for a specific date, the payment had been delayed further. After our intervention and communication with the casino, the player finally received her withdrawal. The issue had been resolved successfully and the complaint had been marked as 'resolved'.

The player from the US has been waiting for his winnings since November. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player's withdrawal was delayed as the casino changed his payment method without any prior notice. The casino stated that the payment had been sent by check as this was the method used for previous withdrawals. However, the check was never received. After some time, the casino stated that they had canceled the payment by check due to the delays and would reissue the payment via Bitcoin. The player then received payment, although it seems some fees were applied without explanation. At this point, the player stated that they considered the matter to be resolved.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings. Her withdrawal requests have been declined. The casino arranged for a check to be issued to the player. The player confirmed it was received and the issue is resolved.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal ten days prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from the US was trying to withdraw his winnings since February. The player was contacted by a responsible person representing the casino and was allowed to withdraw via Bitcoin. The complaint is resolved.

The player from United States has requested a withdrawal almost two months ago. It has been pending since. After some time after the complaint was submitted, the withdrawal was payed to the player and the issue is resolved.

The player from United States is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his funds due to limited availability of payment methods and ongoing verification. After communication he got paid his winnings through Bitcoin.

The player from United States was assured by the casino that the winnings have been sent to her account three weeks ago. Unfortunately, she has never received any funds. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Nevada had requested a withdrawal a month ago, which was subsequently approved but had not been processed. Despite multiple attempts to resolve the issue and promises from the casino, the payment had not been made. The player felt the casino had not adhered to its obligations or rules. After the player had provided all necessary documents and passed KYC verification, the issue remained unresolved for a period of time. However, ultimately, the casino had processed the player's withdrawal and the player confirmed receipt of their funds. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the US had a problem with a casino's promotional offer. Even after satisfying the verification requirements and enduring the waiting period for withdrawal, their payout was denied for supposedly using multiple accounts and multiple free chips. They also had not received a refund for their deposited $17. The player provided screenshots and other necessary information to support their claims. The Complaints Team had contacted the casino and requested further details. After some back-and-forth communication, the player confirmed receipt of the funds, and the issue was marked as resolved.

The player from California had been waiting for a withdrawal approval since February 26th. He had used a $25 no-deposit chip. The player confirmed that the withdrawal had been canceled and the amount had been returned to his casino balance. After the Complaints Team's intervention and communication with the casino, the player confirmed that he had received his winnings. As a result, his complaint had been successfully resolved.

The player from the US had requested three withdrawals from an online casino two months prior but had not received the final payment. Despite having contacted the casino's customer service and having received assurances, the payment had still not been processed. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's responses and delay. We had intervened and communicated with the casino on behalf of the player. The casino then had arranged for the withdrawal to be disbursed as a physical check through a third-party payment provider. Following this, the player had confirmed receipt of the check, resolving the issue. We had thanked the player and the casino for their cooperation and had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Tennessee had been waiting nearly a month for a withdrawal to be processed at Casino. The casino had informed the player that they couldn't send a check due to it being an international transaction, which the player insisted wasn't true. The player had used a free chip to play and had to go through a playthrough of $4000 to receive real money. The casino had initially suggested a resolution through Bitcoin, however, the player had contested withdrawals within the account. After considerable back and forth, the casino had finally escalated the withdrawal for payment via Bitcoin. The player had confirmed receipt of the funds, effectively resolving the complaint.

The player from Alaska had waited for weeks for her withdrawal approval from an online casino. Despite multiple accelerations, the casino had seemed to be stalling. She had two approved withdrawals that hadn't been paid. After several interactions with the casino and reconfirming her information, the player had finally received her winnings. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's customer service and overall experience. The complaint had been marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.

The player from Virginia had encountered an issue with a delayed withdrawal from an online casino. The Complaints Team had advised her that withdrawals could take several days or even weeks to process, and that the delay might have been due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. The player had been advised to wait at least 14 days after requesting the withdrawal before submitting a complaint. The player later confirmed that her withdrawal had been approved and deposited. Consequently, the Complaints Team had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from the United States has requested several withdrawals. Unfortunately, the payments seem to be delayed. Player stopped responding to our question therefore the complaint was rejected. The issue has been resolved successfully.

The player from the United States has requested a withdrawal. Unfortunately, the payment seems to be delayed. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from the United States had requested a withdrawal more than one month prior to submitting this complaint. He received the payment approximately 6 weeks after the withdrawal request was made. The complaint is resolved.

The player from the US was struggling to withdraw her winnings. The casino was paying the player in increments, but the processing of the payments on the casino's side was rather slow. More than two months after submitting the complaint, the player confirmed she had received all her winnings. The complaint was closed as 'Resolved'.

The player from the UK is experiencing difficulties withdrawing funds. Her withdrawal has been pending for a month. After some time, the player managed to receive the withdrawal and the case is solved.

The player from the US was trying to withdraw her winnings. She had to request multiple withdrawals over the course of 7 months before all her winnings were successfully transferred to her bank account. We closed the complaint as 'resolved' after the player received all her funds.

Deborah asked for a withdrawal, but she was informed that her bank is not supported. She created another bank account (which they suggested) and this bank was also not supported. After opening a third account, she is still waiting for her withdrawal. It has already been two months. This case was successfully resolved.

The player from the United States had reported a delay in her withdrawal of $479 winnings from an online casino. Despite having her withdrawal approved since March 14, 2024, and daily email communication, she had not received her winnings. Upon our request for more information, she had responded affirmatively but did not clarify which questions she was answering. We had extended the response time by 7 days, but the player did not provide further details. Consequently, we were unable to investigate the issue further and had to reject the complaint. Later, the player had informed us that her withdrawal issue had been resolved, and thus, we had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from the United States had experienced a delay in his withdrawal process at the online casino. Despite having withdrawn successfully before and having passed the KYC verification, his withdrawal had not been processed within the promised timeframe. The player had expressed dissatisfaction over the casino's handling of the situation. After our intervention and communication with the casino, the player confirmed that the withdrawal had been successfully completed. The casino also confirmed the successful transaction. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the US had had issues with delayed withdrawals at an online casino. After winning on slot games, he had attempted to cash out his winnings multiple times but had not received the funds. He had reached out to the casino's customer support but had not received a satisfactory response. He had had a pending withdrawal of $205 and another for $40. The player had contacted us for assistance, and we had gotten in touch with the casino. After some back-and-forth communication, the player's first withdrawal had been approved, and he had received the funds. However, the second withdrawal had faced delays, and after updating his Bitcoin address, it had also been approved. The player had then successfully received all his winnings. We had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from California had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks before contacting us. Winnings hadn't been obtained up to that day. The player had verified his account and had been approved for withdrawal, but was experiencing delays. He compared the situation to other casinos where withdrawals were instant, expressing dissatisfaction. Eventually, the casino paid him $101.04 via Litecoin. Our team marked the complaint as 'resolved' following the player's confirmation of receiving his winnings.

The player from the US had cashed out $2,500 after playing a No Rules Bonus. On her second withdrawal request, her VIP3 status had been demoted to Depositor, and her withdrawal request was stuck on pending. Customer service had been unresponsive to her inquiries. We had requested more information from the player and contacted Ruby Slots Casino for clarification. The casino representative had assured the payment would be processed soon. Despite no communication from the casino about her demoted VIP status and delayed withdrawal, the player confirmed she had received her winnings. The issue was marked as 'resolved'.

The player from the Netherlands had been waiting for a withdrawal since January 24th, amounting to three weeks of delay. The player's account had been verified and she had won $109 from a $10 deposit, which she had attempted to withdraw. However, the casino had claimed that they had not received the necessary documents for verification. After several back-and-forths, the casino had finally acknowledged receipt of the documents but had claimed that they lacked a valid method of payout. The player had provided her bank details and after further communication, the casino had confirmed that the payout information was on file and payment was pending. The player later confirmed receipt of her winnings, leading to the resolution of the complaint.

A Polish player participated in a free spin promotion and won $1200. Although the maximum payout was stated to be $100, the player only received their deposit back and none of their winnings from the promotion, despite meeting the playthrough requirements.