Jackpot Hunter Casino Review

The player complained about the casino claiming to have not received their deposit. They contacted their payment provider and were able to get proof of the payment leaving their account, but the casino claimed that they had never received the money. There were no more updates ever since, and the complaint is marked as unresolved.

The player complained that the casino kept canceling their withdrawal without giving any reason, their verification was pending as well, and there was no live chat option available. It is unclear whether the player received their payment, and the complaint is marked unresolved.

The player from India had deposited money into his Jackpot Hunter account but the funds were not credited. The casino had not cooperated when the player reached out for assistance, denying the receipt of the deposit. The player had requested a refund but received no response from the casino. The casino eventually responded, citing significant changes and new management, and double-checked the disputed deposit transactions where it was confirmed that no deposit was successfully accepted by Jackpot Hunter at the time. They suggested the player contact the payment providers. However, without a further response from the player to confirm the resolution, we were forced to reject the complaint.

The player from India had raised a complaint about a delayed withdrawal from an online casino. Despite her account having been verified, the casino had cancelled her withdrawal and failed to provide a reason for the delay. The player had also claimed that the casino was unresponsive and speculated that the casino's license might have been fake. In response, the complaints team had attempted to mediate by contacting the casino and asking for clarification. However, the casino did not respond, leading to the complaint being closed as 'unresolved'. The player had been advised to contact the Curacao Gaming Authority for further assistance. The casino later reopened the complaint, stating that the player's funds had been wagered completely and their account had been closed during a site migration. The player denied these claims, leading the complaints team to confirm with the casino's evidence that the player's account balance had indeed been depleted through gameplay. The complaint was eventually rejected due to a lack of wrongdoing on the casino's part.