Well, ok. If you are presumed. I suppose there's no point in opposing, especially if you don't provide concrete gaming sessions for the lucky players you've mentioned to official labs.
I, for example, have another explanation—two, actually.
Care to know the ChatGPT assessment?
"Assessment:
The claim that certain providers like Bgaming or Pragmatic Play use "pattern-based" RNGs, while others like Novomatic rely on "timing-based" mechanics, has no basis in how regulated online slots are designed.
All reputable providers use certified Random Number Generators (RNGs) tested by independent labs. These RNGs ensure every spin is independent and unpredictable — no patterns, no timing exploits.
As for slot tournaments, repeated winners are more likely a result of fast spinning, strategic bet sizing, and understanding the scoring mechanics — not "breaking the system."
This sounds like a classic example of pattern-seeking bias combined with misunderstanding of how modern slots and tournaments actually work."
I can assure you none of this may happen in regulated/licensed casinos if we are talking about original games.
Automatic translation: