HomeForumResponsible GamblingFailure to comply with self-exclusion and responsible gambling.

Failure to comply with self-exclusion and responsible gambling.

137 views 0 replies |
yesterday
|
Add post
yesterday
esus


Casino: Brazino777


Problem description:

I am filing this complaint due to multiple serious failures on the part of the casino regarding responsible gambling and access control.

From February 24th onwards, I was able to make deposits and play on the platform. During the first few days, I was even allowed to play and deposit funds without completing a formal registration or proper verification process.

Additionally, I was under an active self-exclusion condition, which was not respected at any time. Despite this, the casino system allowed me to continue accessing, depositing, and playing without any effective restrictions.

Subsequently, when I contacted the casino and explicitly informed them of my active global self-exclusion, they did not immediately block my access in accordance with responsible gambling principles. Instead, I have evidence that they acknowledged the situation and mentioned a "weekly refund" system as a form of compensation.

The closure of my account only occurred after multiple deposits had already been made, which does not correct or justify the initial fault.

This represents a serious breach of responsible gaming policies. A self-excluded user should not be able to access the platform, not even without registering, much less make deposits.

Additionally:

Access and gameplay were allowed without full registration in the first few days

The casino did not perform adequate checks

There was no effective mechanism to block my activity

I was allowed to deposit significant amounts in short periods (including over $11,000 MXN in less than 24 hours)

A form of compensation was offered instead of applying the corresponding protective measures.

I contacted the casino directly; however, their responses have been generic and without a clear solution. My case has been "escalated to a specialized team," but so far I haven't received a concrete resolution or a defined timeframe.

Application:

I request a full refund of the deposits made during the period in which my self-exclusion should have been respected.

Evidence:

I can provide:

Deposit history

Activity tests without initial registration

Screenshots where the casino acknowledges the situation and mentions the "weekly refund"

Communications with the casino

I believe this situation constitutes a clear violation of responsible gambling principles, and therefore I request a review of the case.


I request a thorough review of my case, as there is clear evidence that I was allowed to play despite having an active global self-exclusion, and I also operated without proper verification in the first few days, which represents a serious breach of responsible gambling policies.

Additionally, I have evidence where the casino itself acknowledges the existence of a weekly refund system, which has not been applied fairly in my case.

Therefore, I request a fair and proportionate solution that addresses the irregularities I have identified. Should I not receive a favorable response, I will escalate the case to authorities such as the Ministry of the Interior and the Federal Consumer Protection Agency, as well as publicly expose the situation on specialized platforms like Casino Guru and AskGamblers, which could have a significant reputational impact.

I await a clear, definitive resolution within a reasonable timeframe.

Sincerely,

Hilda S.

Automatic translation:

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
2000eur push_alt
Share your wins on Pragmatic Play slots, get another chance for winning with Casino Guru!
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more

Subscribe to our newsletter for no deposit bonuses, free tournaments, new slots, and more.