HomeForumGeneral Gambling DiscussionQuestion Violation of self-exclusion across Santeda International BV brands (Velobet, Goldenbet, Cosmobet)

Question Violation of self-exclusion across Santeda International BV brands (Velobet, Goldenbet, Cosmobet)

53 views 0 replies |
1 hour ago
|
Add post
1 hour ago
czus

Hello everyone,

I need advice regarding violating self-exclusion and chargeback options. Here is my situation:


Self-exclusion: On June 19, 2026, I officially requested permanent self-exclusion due to severe gambling addiction on Velobet using my verified identity (KYC documents). My request was accepted and confirmed.


Violations by sister sites: Both Goldenbet and Cosmobet allowed me to register with my real details and deposit money, even though they are operated by the exact same parent company — Santeda International BV


Payment Masking: When checking bank statements at ČSOB, all card deposits were charged under completely unrelated third-party merchant names (e.g. nexgam3, creski3, arnggc, elegro.eu). The Compliance Officer at Goldenbet confirmed to me in writing that they use third-party processors with unknown descriptions.


Current status: Goldenbet Compliance rejected my refund request, claiming that each website operates independently.


Do Velobet, Goldenbet and Cosmobet legally fall under one operator (Santeda International BV) with a shared duty of care for self-excluded players?


Am I in a strong position to resolve this through Casino Guru / Curaçao GCB, or should I go straight to the bank chargeback route through ČSOB (Visa/Mastercard) based on operator error and masking of payments?


thank you in advance

Automatic translation:

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more