This poll is very straightforward. Generally speaking, we know that many players love bonuses. On the other hand, some casinos have terrible withdrawal periods and policies.
What's the most important factor for you? Do you miss any on the list?
I would like to play in a casino where, in total,
at least the following qualities are present:
1. Legality. That is, in the country of the online casino player
should be allowed in general. (And this, the specific in particular).
2. The ability for a player to go to court using
reliable and "tested" procedures and algorithms.
There must also be precedents and guarantees.
quick and objective investigation.
At least these two legs. 🙂 Then we can talk about
the advantages of online gaming.
The rest of the wishes are secondary: real and uncompromising checks, serious sanctions against
lawbreakers. Up to and including investigation
internal casino rules for illegality and
legal "nullity". The same applies to absurd
demands and arbitrariness of the administration.
Players also need a reliable and fast payment system,
a complex of an online wallet and a card.
Hello, I see that the license is probably one of the most important for you. From this, it seems that you can also file a complaint with the regulator and therefore the investigation should go through on the level.
Anyway, we probably won't be talking about all licenses because some of them don't even address complaints.
But an interesting view, thank you for that.🙂
Well it was strange for me to see the results as people are more interested in bonuses than in trust and reputation. Seems kinda weird. You should always know who takes your money, and even more - from whom you might take it back
Hello, I first thought about the inaccurate translation, but I was convinced,
what is the difference in the text between "legality," and
the presence of a "license". Very few are legal, that is, permitted by the law of the player's home country.
online casinos. They must meet certain
special requirements and are officially registered.
Some examples may be outdated
states in America and lands (Länder) in Germany.
Already 10 years ago such online bookmakers appeared
in Russia. I made bets in one of the "offices" (after
difficult registration) and I am very pleased with the system.
But online casinos are NOT ALLOWED there. Only land-based ones in "Gambling Zones".
And in Belarus there are ground buses everywhere, especially in the capital.
An analogy can be found in the situation with some plants,
permitted in one country but prohibited in another.
Moreover, patients who have taken the medicine are not punished.
But will their complaint be accepted or will they be compensated for their losses?
License... Agent 007 hardly has a license to kill
will be taken into account in any court. 🙂
I'm afraid I'll be misunderstood again.
due to the imperfect analogies above.
I think online casinos have potential
become even better and more attractive than the ground ones.
But! They have long since turned away from this bright and noble
paths, succumbing to the temptation of easy criminal profit.
The land-based ones have reasons that limit their arbitrariness.
As a result, I have not seen any non-payment of money for many years.
at the box office, in exchange for chips or tickets.
Moreover, even in "underground" establishments.
Of course, minors are not allowed there.
This is the level to which online casinos should grow,
and start with this.
By the way, I personally do not rule out their global ban.
in the near future. With a revival later in a new capacity.
I think I understood some things, maybe not everything, but I guess I understood the point, which is the most important.
Casinos are supposed to protect players and in the online world sometimes that is not the case. It would be good if players could always turn to an institution that would help them in times when the casino is unfair and has abusive practices.
Anyway, I suppose we have to know that it doesn't work like that and I will mention again in the online world. There is a lot that a casino can get around, that players are trying to get around, and finding the perfect balance is sometimes difficult. Still, there are casinos that manage it.
Thank you for your work
explain these complex details.
Initially I just responded to
proposal to supplement the list
questions: "Do you miss anyone on the list?"
Above I gave examples of successful solutions (mostly)
problems, in particular, "non-payment".
Especially since sports betting
via the Internet, of course, and
noticeably more comfortable than in the rooms on the ground. That is,
Precedents have already been created in some countries.
Control over the network is entirely possible,
I will not list the dangerous topics that are intensively and successfully monitored, blocked and
even provoked with the purpose
cleaning.
Please do not take all this as an attempt to reproach the wonderful Guru casino. May all one hundred of its nice (judging by the portraits) employees prosper.
I personally don't play online.
casino for 10 years, but without stress
I get money at the cash desks "on the ground". They pay there for the reason
inevitable and unacceptable
problems in case of failure, as well as
kindness, justice and this...
casino liability, yes.
Yes, maybe a good addition to what's missing. It's a list that could be supplemented with perhaps more things, but these are probably the most common things we see in players. Of course every other thing that players add in the conversation can be discussed. It's good to exchange views and opinions and that's something I like to do. You can learn a lot from it or look at things from a different perspective.
So thanks again for your input. 🙂
I think if we talk reputation it means all the above features - withdrawals, trust, support etc. Of course it shouldn't be cheap and maybe the bonuses won't be that big, but come on - it's a safe and trusted place.
When it comes to where I choose to play, trust and reputation are the most important factors for me. I want to make sure that the site is reliable, safe and treats its players fairly. A good reputation says a lot about how a casino or platform treats its users.
I think if we talk reputation it means all the above features - withdrawals, trust, support etc. Of course it shouldn't be cheap and maybe the bonuses won't be that big, but come on - it's a safe and trusted place.
Good point. Among trust and reputation, I was also considering the casino's background, it's size compared to withdrawal limits and so on.
When it comes to where I choose to play, trust and reputation are the most important factors for me. I want to make sure that the site is reliable, safe and treats its players fairly. A good reputation says a lot about how a casino or platform treats its users.
Very complex. How do you let, let's say, verify all these aspects?
Thank you for your interest. I verify these things by checking licenses and reading user reviews. A reliable site should have a valid gaming license, positive player feedback, and transparent operations.
🙏👍🤪
Do you know if there are any other polls I can participate in? I couldn't find any in the forum section.
Thank you for your interest. I verify these things by checking licenses and reading user reviews. A reliable site should have a valid gaming license, positive player feedback, and transparent operations.
I would be very careful with positive user feedback. We reject more than 1/3 of the totally submitted reviews, most of them positive, submitted in a belief that such reviews will increase the Safety Index.
TrustPilot, in my opinion, faces the very same issue.
Thank you very much!
Free professional educational courses for online casino employees aimed at industry best practices, improving player experience, and fair approach to gambling.
An initiative we launched with the goal to create a global self-exclusion system, which will allow vulnerable players to block their access to all online gambling opportunities.
