Payment intermediaries and liability

What do casino people think?

There are many scam casinos that do not pay withdrawals and are passive, among other things, in responding to guru/comblaints complaints. What enables the operation ..... money brokers who cooperate with the casino by enabling deposits ...... not to mention the morality of game providers. There is reason to suspect that payment brokers and game providers are involved in criminal activity. Games OFF and payment processing STOP....!

Many times, such sites use fake games, though. Which means that game providers do not even know they use their games, actually. It is really difficult to track them, too.

Surely game publishers should know who the games were rented to.....and for example, using counterfeit money is a crime and the sentences are accordingly. Romi, what do you think about the responsibility of banks/payment intermediaries.....they mediate deposits and enable the operation of fraudulent casinos and perhaps knowingly cooperate...🤔

Well, if it were that easy, it would be great, and no fake games would exist, right?

When it comes to the payment providers, we experienced many times that they didn't even know for what purpose the money was used, you know. I would surely not accuse anyone that they do it on purpose, though.

Hmmm, I disagree. Payment processors know where the deposits go.....and game providers have strong legal standing against fake game providers.

Hello, let me disagree too. Intermediary banks and payment processors are also part of the chain, so they do not actually know the details. They are only hired to assist with transactions within regulated markets.

There are special companies focusing on high-risk payments—gambling and porn included. Did you know? Casinos may have no idea what the company will list in your banking history once you deposit.

There are rarely such fake game providers the way you suggested; it all works very differently, to be honest. But this issue is something the game providers should explain, not me.

Simplified what I mean: I make a deposit to casino X using skrill/rapid payment gateway. Casino X and Skrill have an agreement. I win 1000e and make a withdrawal.....all conditions and Kyc are met. Casino X turns out to be a fraud and does not pay my withdrawal. I consider Skrill to be an accomplice by enabling money transfers to casino X.

I interpret your statement as "hidden protection"

Simple...it is known, for example, through several complaints made to the guru, that the casino does not pay out winnings/reacts....the operation continues and, for example, Visa processes deposits....enabling activity that is suspected of being fraudulent. Are payment processors involved in the fraud?