Why are poor casinos recommended?

I have been playing at online casinos for about 25 years. The reason I sometimes have to look for new places is that I have asked to close my account due to gambling addiction. The truth is that the only good casinos are those with huge withdrawal limits. Everything else is crap. If you happen to win a larger amount, you will have to wait for your money at best. There are 2 state-owned casinos here in Finland. There are not many bonuses, but when you win, you can be 100% sure that the money will be in your account within a few seconds. No need to send bank statements or proof of address. The fact that you log in reliably with bank codes is enough. That is why I wonder about the casino guru's recommendations for many casinos if the withdrawal limit is even 4000€ per month, how can you recommend one. That already shows that it is not a reputable casino. Opinions?

We'd like to inform our users about every online casino we can actually find, and that is why, you know.

We even inform about bad casinos so everyone can stay alert.

It's good that you tell people and find out. Otherwise, it's really good that you help players with problems. I'm not writing this negatively about you. I mainly want to ask why, for example, when I open the 'recommended' casinos on the page, Realz casino comes up, for example. The withdrawal limit is €500 per day according to the presentation and I wonder if it was €7,000 per month. I think that's a little. So how can you recommend it? I haven't won anything, but there's a big difference if there are no withdrawal limits and then such insignificant amounts. It doesn't inspire any confidence in me.

It is not that simple, you know. The safety index is not based only on the withdrawal limits, of course.

You can actually learn more here and see how we review all online casinos on our website.

If you'd like to ask anything, do so at any time.