Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
Automatic translation:
sammieannsmom2005
sanyojesse
Bronze
sanyojesse
2 years ago
I have read it and it absolutely proved that they manipulated roulette. They admitted it AND paid that player money to keep quiet about it. That's enough proof for me
Automatic translation:
sammieannsmom2005
sanyojesse
Bronze
sanyojesse
2 years ago
Exactly no review should have to be "evaluated".…..for what ? To see if you agree with it ? This is not right
Automatic translation:
Radka
Community Specialist
sammieannsmom2005
2 years ago
Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
Automatic translation:
2 years ago
I'm just wondering why you need to create another account to address the same situation. It's not pretty honest, if you ask me. The same goes for the highly unproved yet very untruthful reviews you've posted on the Trust Pilot site. Two times, what a coincidence, right? We won't tolerate such an approach hence, I'm banning your account for trying to cause reputation damage.
If you can't play it fair, you are not welcome anymore.