Giorgipipia's list of warnings

I want to make a list of casinos so that all players avoid them: Rocketplay.com, Adrenaline, Fresh, Winspirit, I Wild, Spinch, Jeetsity, BitStarz, Extreme, Brango, Lemon, Stelario, Wanted Win, Fast Pay, Zodiac casino. I'll tell you a short story: I found the casino Guru online and, on her advice, I started playing at these casinos. I want to tell you honestly: in each of them, I lost at least 5,000, 10,000, and 15,000 dollars. In Jeetcity.com, I lost $38,000. What I want to say is that all these casinos not only have a low RTP but also poor service. I just want to warn you that all these casinos do not deserve a safety rating for players. They deserve a higher safety rating for their casino, but not for players. Now imagine how many thousands of dollars I gave to these online casinos because of one online platform and this is the Guru casino. What I'm getting at is don't trust any ratings, look for your own casinos by trying them with minimal amounts of money, otherwise you'll lose like I lost more than 200 thousand dollars. I wish everyone well and prosperity, I wish people not to lose their heads and to play for pleasure, not excitement.

Hello again, this is a special thread I created for you to discuss a few facts.

I wholeheartedly agree that it makes perfect sense to read more than one casino review to learn about its features and form your own opinion.

What you probably missed on our website is that the Safety Index does not tell you anything about your chances of winning. Please don't confuse safety with RNG-based luck in games. I understand that a higher index may lead you to believe that everyone will be happy in the casinos, but this is not the case. Remember that gambling is primarily about losing.

If you read a casino review, you will notice that "win marker" is not mentioned because it has never been included in that index.

I hope this explains how the Safety Index works and what it means.

https://casino.guru/guide/our-casino-reviews

Casinos would be considered unfair if they failed to pay out your winnings or used a ridiculous excuse to prevent you from withdrawing.

After reading everything you've written on your forum, it appears that your desire to criticize our work is still motivated by confusion. Our website will not tell you which casino you will eventually win or lose at. If the description does not fit you, that is fine, but you will not receive the rating you seek here, I believe.

I'll be available if you have any further questions on this subject.

Thank you.

Well, here are 3 casinos that don't pay out, but for some reason they have a high security index: Extreme, Brango, Zodiac Casino.

I want to let you know that I'm familiar with all the rules and information, but keep in mind that your rating isn't just based on security but also on fair treatment of online casino users. If you'd like, I can conduct an investigation and film a report on these three casinos, and I'll provide you with all the facts that prove they don't deserve the highest ranking on this forum. Believe me, if I try hard enough, I can get more casinos onto this list. I'd advise you to reconsider, and best of all, give us players the right to vote. Then there won't be any suspicions and everything will be transparent. That way, the ranking will include those who truly deserve it.

Okay, thank you very much for moving to a concrete topic, something we can work with.

Do you know why those casinos decided not to pay you, please?

Furthermore, there is a way to file an official complaint. Which is the tool we provide to players so that they can directly change the Safety Index based on their actual experiences.

In my opinion, it is a worthwhile step because it closes the "gap" between the calculated index and your personal experience.

What do you think? Are you interested in details?

You see, if those casino-related issues are less than 6 months old, we may be able to shed some light on those payment disputes.

You keep repeating what you are familiar with and that you have already provided everything to us. What I know is that your previous account was closed, so none of us here have the knowledge you so stubbornly avoid sharing once more.

Romi informed you of that, and I am reiterating the same point.

If you criticize our ratings, that is acceptable; however, if you are unwilling to support your criticism with specific facts explaining what went wrong with those particular casinos, then it presents a challenge.

Could you please provide specific facts with your criticism so that Casino Guru can address your concerns effectively? Could you please help us understand your perspective on what you believe went wrong? We are no casino, and our rules are set on fairness and logic. You currently act quite strangely, though I feel your deeds may be beneficial.

However, under such circumstances, there is nothing concrete we can look into, don't you think?