1. As far as we know, licensed casinos cannot offer fake games. If they offered unlicensed games, they would not be licensed.
2.> For example, know that many providers (not casinos) prefer to stream games from unofficial sources to avoid restricted countries and markets. This is not a scam against players as it has nothing to do with RTP. Many popular games have their graphics enhanced and modified to suit specific countries and markets.
3. Contact the new casino licensee, GCB, and ask them to investigate the issue. As an intermediary, we are not in a position to investigate the origins of the casino games. Only the licensing body can do that.
Now, please answer my question.
I have little knowledge of casinos and games, but I believe you are knowledgeable enough about providers and how they work to call yourself an expert.
Wazdan games usually have a feature that allows players to set the volatility in three stages.
Regarding this function, is it possible for the casino site to delete (fix) the function itself at the implementation stage?
Also, in my past testing, I have never been able to exceed $2,000 with a 1/2 gamble. This is an unusual behavior due to the nature of the 1/2 gamble.
Regarding 2., I have already reported the behavior of the game Moon Princess to the team that reports problems or suggests improvements, but I have a question I would like to ask here.
When I checked the developer tools, it showed an RTP of 96% in demo play, but the RTP was hidden in real play.
I have only had experience playing with Play'n Go's extremely low RTP's up to 91% of the time.
Therefore, we cannot say for certain about this, but under the normal presentation rules up to 91%, we have not been able to confirm any rules that would cause high-payout symbols to change to low-payout symbols or disappear.
If the RTP falls below that, will there be any special effects?
Wazdan clearly stated their RTP, so from what I have verified, I believe they are cheating.
As far as I know, Play'n Go is unable to confirm the RTP of F1casino, so I wonder if this is possible if the RTP is significantly lower.
I looked at several sites run by WoT NV, and they all advertised large bonuses, but the wagering requirements for those bonuses were often low and easy to clear.
But how many users are actually able to meet the conditions and withdraw large amounts?
Even to my level of knowledge, the bonuses they are advertising are far too abnormally high.
Although withdrawals are easily attainable, many users are citing issues with the RTP rather than reporting wins.
3. I don't know how to report to the GCB, and I'm not a heavy user. Even if I reported it for fake RTP, I don't think I'd get my money back.
However, I think that those of you who call yourself casino gurus would benefit from keeping the safety index of this casino site high and intact.
I suppose they might say that the information I provided to the investigative department this time is not enough.
I don't want any more users in the community to suffer further damage, so I focused on the fact that CasinoGuru's safety index is unreasonably high. I had some free time today, so I played a little bit and just wanted to report that F1Casino hasn't changed at all since the old days.
I think that if the leading experts in casino gurus would do even a little research, many users would be spared from becoming victims.
I'm sure you also have a desire to increase the safety index.