Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 86)

Exactly, the casinos bring 3 (!) lawyers to the table, the loser has to pay the legal costs and the opposing side's legal fees... which makes you wonder how many lawyers you can actually bring in and cause exorbitant costs without any restrictions?!? And why do you need 4 lawyers and a judge to hold a "trial" that ends anyway with a two-liner about who showed up and what day the case was adjourned to, and the whole thing in xxx cases for the xxx time....

what's new from the 7 joker negotiations?

Yes, always the same, again postponed to autumn 2024. Unbelievable. So nothing worth mentioning

Craziness!!!!

Do the PKF actually have to go through with this or can they pull the ripcord and give up?

Most people no longer file for executions and just wait until no costs arise.

Today is another negotiation at 12:30 against TSG

What does that mean:

Status CONTINUATION

Outcome FREED

??

Something about a sequel

Continuation and result: released

that's how I interpret it hmmm but what was released

Hmmm, the money???? No idea, unfortunately. Otherwise I'll just ask my former lawyer, Mr. Cocron.

Ask me, I would be interested

because I haven't read "FREED" anywhere yet hmmm

Already done. It might just take a while, lol. I have very good contact with him, even after my trials that I had in 2020. I watch a lot for him, etc.

By the way, our BGH has ruled against your Sportwetten GmbH.

OUR sports betting GmbH? Win2Day?

I don't think I'm allowed to write the plaintiff's name, but if you search for civil courts tsg then the oldest case from 2019 is called FREED where the hearing was today

I ZR 88/23 is the file number of the BGH.

The lawsuit was against Betano, a Maltese company that also has an office in AT.. has nothing to do with win2day

Exactly

Can punters claim back losses if the sports betting provider does not have a license? The Federal Court of Justice was unable to decide on this for a long time because the providers compensated customers at the last minute. Now the Federal Court of Justice has resorted to a trick.

Many people who have made losses in previous years when betting on sports online can hope for a refund. The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has clearly sided with the players in a case that it plans to hear at the beginning of May. According to the preliminary assessment of the I Civil Senate, the provider has violated the provisions of the State Treaty on Gambling (GlüStV) in its 2012 version, according to the previously unpublished advisory decision that LTO has received (decision of March 22, 2024, ref. I ZR 88/23).

No submission to Luxembourg

The First Civil Senate sees no need to refer the case to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as the decisive legal questions have already been sufficiently clarified. Not the subject of the appeal, but also of interest to friends of private international law: the Dresden Higher Regional Court derived international jurisdiction from Article 18 paragraph 1 and Article 17 paragraph 1 letter c of the Brussels Ia Regulation and the application of German substantive law from Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Rome I Regulation.

A hearing for the appeal has been scheduled for May 2. There are already thousands of cases of this kind, because on the one hand several companies have offered sports betting in a legally unclear situation and on the other hand law firms have specialized in such cases and actively acquire sports bettors. So far the courts have ruled differently (see also case number I ZR 90/23), the advisory decision will now be groundbreaking in this respect.