10 months ago
I always got at least 90% in 2020. One even got the full amount plus interest, and that's one of them who's now not paying at all. Unfortunately, it was much easier back then than it is now.
Automatic translation:
Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 123)
10 months ago
New video from Staudt Law
https://youtu.be/dyNWPJbxQbs?si=OfR8Gwhnp--BG7SE
Automatic translation:
10 months ago
10 months ago
Good, right? It will probably still take years
Automatic translation:
10 months ago
9 months ago
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
The conclusion doesn't sound so great after all, or how should that be understood?
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Not at all, advofin also responded to a comment on trustpilot that it was hyped up by the media and that it actually doesn't mean anything.
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Well, are you also excited about the ECJ in July?
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
If only it weren't so long until July 2026 🙁
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Why July?
c440/23 is actually the first important procedure, could be groundbreaking
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
I hope that the ECJ will issue a landmark ruling and not a case-by-case ruling... I am a bit worried that Bill 55 will not be specifically classified as contrary to EU law in the proceedings.
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
In July (was it July 15?), the Attorney General will deliver his final submissions. We will most likely know more then, and hopefully, a positive direction will emerge.
Automatic translation:
ReplyQuote1
9 months ago
On 10 July 2025 he will announce his final submissions
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Nothing's happening on July 10th. The decision won't be made until the end of the year. And even if a decision is made (positive or negative), that doesn't mean we'll see our money. So curb your euphoria. 😏
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
In my opinion, a decision won't come until the end of the year at the earliest. However, I could imagine that if things go in the direction we hope, significantly more casinos will start settlements in the hope of offsetting some of the interest.
What do you all mean?
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Yes, for those cases that don't yet have enforcement orders and are being conducted in Malta. I could imagine the settlements being possible for those cases.
Automatic translation:
9 months ago
Well, someone with a legally binding judgment has no reason to enter into a settlement.
In well over 80 percent of cases, the ECJ judgment is reflected in the Advocate General’s Opinion
Automatic translation:
ReplyQuote2
9 months ago
We must not forget the bankruptcies that will occur if the judgments really have to be paid with interest.
Automatic translation:
Add post
