The player from Texas faced challenges in the KYC process for withdrawing funds, as the casino deemed his secondary proof of residency insufficient despite having provided a driver's license, bank statement, and letters from the bank. The player was frustrated by the lack of clarity regarding acceptable secondary proofs and was required to restart the process. The Complaints Team concluded that the casino was not an official establishment but a social casino, resulting in the closure of the complaint as it fell outside their jurisdiction for dispute resolution. The player declined the option to reopen the case after stating that the casino had not acknowledged his KYC documentation.

