Hello.
We are disappointed that, despite the clear confirmation from the game provider that the player was engaging in card counting, this has not been considered sufficient grounds to uphold our original decision.
All parties involved have acknowledged that the player was using a card-counting strategy. The fact that no external software or devices were used does not change the core issue: the provider has identified the behaviour as an attempt to gain an unfair advantage, which is explicitly against our terms and conditions. Our rules exist to protect the integrity of the games and to ensure a fair environment for all players.
WSM Casino is a licensed and legitimate operation that treats every complaint seriously. We carry out thorough internal reviews and rely on official reports from our game providers before making any final decision. Our intention is always to resolve genuine disputes in a fair, transparent, and reasonable manner.
However, we cannot allow complaint platforms to be used as leverage by players attempting to justify behaviour that breaches our rules. These platforms are intended to help resolve legitimate issues, not to pressure operators into paying out cases involving confirmed advantage play.
If we were to pay out winnings in a case where prohibited behaviour has been identified, it would set a dangerous precedent. It would effectively signal that such strategies can be rewarded if enough external pressure is applied, which would create ongoing issues for both our operation and the wider ecosystem.
As a gesture of goodwill, we have already offered to return the player’s initial deposit, despite the breach. This reflects our commitment to fairness, but we will not be strong-armed into paying out winnings in cases involving confirmed rule violations or bad-faith claims.
We remain committed to fair play, transparency, and the proper handling of all legitimate player concerns, and we will continue to act in accordance with our terms, our providers’ findings, and the integrity of the platform.
Hello.
We are disappointed that, despite the clear confirmation from the game provider that the player was engaging in card counting, this has not been considered sufficient grounds to uphold our original decision.
All parties involved have acknowledged that the player was using a card-counting strategy. The fact that no external software or devices were used does not change the core issue: the provider has identified the behaviour as an attempt to gain an unfair advantage, which is explicitly against our terms and conditions. Our rules exist to protect the integrity of the games and to ensure a fair environment for all players.
WSM Casino is a licensed and legitimate operation that treats every complaint seriously. We carry out thorough internal reviews and rely on official reports from our game providers before making any final decision. Our intention is always to resolve genuine disputes in a fair, transparent, and reasonable manner.
However, we cannot allow complaint platforms to be used as leverage by players attempting to justify behaviour that breaches our rules. These platforms are intended to help resolve legitimate issues, not to pressure operators into paying out cases involving confirmed advantage play.
If we were to pay out winnings in a case where prohibited behaviour has been identified, it would set a dangerous precedent. It would effectively signal that such strategies can be rewarded if enough external pressure is applied, which would create ongoing issues for both our operation and the wider ecosystem.
As a gesture of goodwill, we have already offered to return the player’s initial deposit, despite the breach. This reflects our commitment to fairness, but we will not be strong-armed into paying out winnings in cases involving confirmed rule violations or bad-faith claims.
We remain committed to fair play, transparency, and the proper handling of all legitimate player concerns, and we will continue to act in accordance with our terms, our providers’ findings, and the integrity of the platform.