Michal, Casino Guru team,
Thank you for the continued work on this case.
After reading the casino’s final position, I have to say this publicly and very clearly:
The clause they are relying on prohibits "any slot featuring bonus buy or any kind of in-game free spins, bonus rounds, or jackpot features".
In practice this rule excludes literally 95–98 % of all modern video slots (including almost the entire catalogues of Pragmatic Play, Nolimit City, Hacksaw, Push Gaming, Relax, Play’n GO, etc.).
Big Bass Boxing Bonus Round, Sweet Bonanza, Gates of Olympus, Mental, Wanted Dead or a Wild, Chaos Crew, Cash Crew… all of them have free-spin bonus rounds. They are standard industry slots, not some obscure high-risk games.
Yet:
None of these games were blocked while the bonus was active
The wagering contribution counter was visibly moving on every single spin (their own real-time system confirmed eligibility)
Support agent Regina explicitly told me: "a message appears… indicating whether the bonus counts toward the wagering requirements" → that message always showed it was counting
No pop-up, no warning, no restriction in the client whatsoever
This is the very definition of an unfair and unacceptable term under European consumer law and under most licensing jurisdictions (including Curacao’s new fairness guidelines). A term that:
bans thousands of completely normal slots,
is not actively enforced by the casino’s own platform,
allows the casino to let players wager for hours/days, complete 70× wagering, and then confiscate everything retroactively is nothing more than a hidden trap designed to make every single bonus theoretically voidable at the casino’s discretion.
No reasonable player can be expected to know that practically the entire slot lobby is forbidden when the casino’s own system actively accepts the bets and counts the progress.
This is not "bonus abuse" — this is system-enabled entrapment.
I am therefore formally asking Casino Guru to mark this complaint as unresolved and to issue a strong Fairness Warning (or even Blacklist consideration) against tether.bet for using deliberately predatory and unenforceable bonus conditions that make fair play impossible.
I no longer consent to any further back-and-forth or extensions — the casino had their chance and their justification is indefensible.
Thank you for your time and for standing up for players.
loseruman
Michal, Casino Guru team,
Thank you for the continued work on this case.
After reading the casino’s final position, I have to say this publicly and very clearly:
The clause they are relying on prohibits "any slot featuring bonus buy or any kind of in-game free spins, bonus rounds, or jackpot features".
In practice this rule excludes literally 95–98 % of all modern video slots (including almost the entire catalogues of Pragmatic Play, Nolimit City, Hacksaw, Push Gaming, Relax, Play’n GO, etc.).
Big Bass Boxing Bonus Round, Sweet Bonanza, Gates of Olympus, Mental, Wanted Dead or a Wild, Chaos Crew, Cash Crew… all of them have free-spin bonus rounds. They are standard industry slots, not some obscure high-risk games.
Yet:
None of these games were blocked while the bonus was active
The wagering contribution counter was visibly moving on every single spin (their own real-time system confirmed eligibility)
Support agent Regina explicitly told me: "a message appears… indicating whether the bonus counts toward the wagering requirements" → that message always showed it was counting
No pop-up, no warning, no restriction in the client whatsoever
This is the very definition of an unfair and unacceptable term under European consumer law and under most licensing jurisdictions (including Curacao’s new fairness guidelines). A term that:
bans thousands of completely normal slots,
is not actively enforced by the casino’s own platform,
allows the casino to let players wager for hours/days, complete 70× wagering, and then confiscate everything retroactively is nothing more than a hidden trap designed to make every single bonus theoretically voidable at the casino’s discretion.
No reasonable player can be expected to know that practically the entire slot lobby is forbidden when the casino’s own system actively accepts the bets and counts the progress.
This is not "bonus abuse" — this is system-enabled entrapment.
I am therefore formally asking Casino Guru to mark this complaint as unresolved and to issue a strong Fairness Warning (or even Blacklist consideration) against tether.bet for using deliberately predatory and unenforceable bonus conditions that make fair play impossible.
I no longer consent to any further back-and-forth or extensions — the casino had their chance and their justification is indefensible.
Thank you for your time and for standing up for players.
loseruman