To Whom It May Concern,
I am filing a formal dispute against Stake.com for serious breaches of responsible gambling policies, specifically regarding permanent self-exclusion and regulatory circumvention.
On November 21, 2022, I initiated a permanent self-exclusion from Stake.com. According to their own responsible gambling policies, this exclusion should have prohibited me from accessing any gambling services provided by or affiliated with Stake.com from that point forward.
Despite this, Stake.com later advertised and directly promoted Stake.us, encouraging self-excluded users, as well as users from restricted regions, to continue gambling via their affiliated platform. This is clearly demonstrated in the promotional messages I received, where Stake.com explicitly stated that their services were unavailable in my region (Ontario, Canada), yet encouraged me to sign up for Stake.us, which they described as their "social casino."
Not only was I able to access Stake.us, but I was also able to register a new account, pass their verification process, and deposit large sums of money — despite my permanent exclusion from their ecosystem. This would not have been possible had the self-exclusion policy been properly integrated and enforced across both platforms, as is expected from any operator claiming a commitment to responsible gambling.
This demonstrates:
A failure in cross-platform exclusion enforcement, where a self-excluded user on Stake.com was knowingly allowed to gamble again on Stake.us.
A deliberate redirection and advertisement of an alternative gambling platform to users who should not be gambling at all under Stake’s own exclusion policy.
A lack of sufficient safeguards—including CDD, AML, and biometric verification—that would have otherwise flagged me as a previously self-excluded user.
Proposal:
I am seeking a full refund of all deposits made on my Stake.com account. This refund is warranted due to Stake’s failure to uphold its own self-exclusion policies and the active facilitation of continued gambling despite a clear and confirmed request for permanent exclusion.
I am prepared to provide all supporting documents, communications, and screenshots that confirm these failures, including:
Confirmation of permanent self-exclusion from Stake.com
Promotional material and redirection to Stake.us
Proof of activity and losses on Stake.us
Location evidence showing usage from a restricted jurisdiction
Please advise on the next steps.
To Whom It May Concern,
I am filing a formal dispute against Stake.com for serious breaches of responsible gambling policies, specifically regarding permanent self-exclusion and regulatory circumvention.
On November 21, 2022, I initiated a permanent self-exclusion from Stake.com. According to their own responsible gambling policies, this exclusion should have prohibited me from accessing any gambling services provided by or affiliated with Stake.com from that point forward.
Despite this, Stake.com later advertised and directly promoted Stake.us, encouraging self-excluded users, as well as users from restricted regions, to continue gambling via their affiliated platform. This is clearly demonstrated in the promotional messages I received, where Stake.com explicitly stated that their services were unavailable in my region (Ontario, Canada), yet encouraged me to sign up for Stake.us, which they described as their "social casino."
Not only was I able to access Stake.us, but I was also able to register a new account, pass their verification process, and deposit large sums of money — despite my permanent exclusion from their ecosystem. This would not have been possible had the self-exclusion policy been properly integrated and enforced across both platforms, as is expected from any operator claiming a commitment to responsible gambling.
This demonstrates:
A failure in cross-platform exclusion enforcement, where a self-excluded user on Stake.com was knowingly allowed to gamble again on Stake.us.
A deliberate redirection and advertisement of an alternative gambling platform to users who should not be gambling at all under Stake’s own exclusion policy.
A lack of sufficient safeguards—including CDD, AML, and biometric verification—that would have otherwise flagged me as a previously self-excluded user.
Proposal:
I am seeking a full refund of all deposits made on my Stake.com account. This refund is warranted due to Stake’s failure to uphold its own self-exclusion policies and the active facilitation of continued gambling despite a clear and confirmed request for permanent exclusion.
I am prepared to provide all supporting documents, communications, and screenshots that confirm these failures, including:
Confirmation of permanent self-exclusion from Stake.com
Promotional material and redirection to Stake.us
Proof of activity and losses on Stake.us
Location evidence showing usage from a restricted jurisdiction
Please advise on the next steps.