Hello Tomas,
Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this case.
After reviewing all available internal records linked to the email addresses provided, we would like to present a clear summary of events and our findings.
The player initially contacted us requesting account closure and referencing gambling-related concerns on March 31.
During the same period, multiple follow-up conversations show the player also actively requested bonuses, free spins, and retention offers.
In several instances, the player explicitly responded to closure-related communication with requests to keep the account open in exchange for promotional offers.
The account was subsequently closed after further communication, in line with the final closure request received and confirmed with the player.
It is important to highlight that our team cannot reasonably treat a case as a confirmed self-exclusion request when the communication from the player is inconsistent and includes simultaneous requests for account retention benefits (such as bonuses and VIP offers). In such situations, we proceed cautiously, prioritising documented user intent and ensuring that any action taken reflects the most recent and explicit request from the player.
At no point was the player encouraged or required to continue playing. Promotional offers are part of standard communications and are not intended to override or discourage a valid and unambiguous self-exclusion request. When a clear and final closure request was established, the account was closed accordingly.
We found that the deposits were made while the account was still open and before we received a clear and final self-exclusion request that met our responsible gambling process. We also saw that the player used bonuses during this time. As the deposit has already been used, we are not able to refund it.
The player states that she repeatedly requested a ban due to gambling addiction and believes that receiving promotional offers during that period was inappropriate. However, at the same time, she was also requesting refunds or compensation in the form of bonuses with low wagering requirements, which is inconsistent with a clear and unconditional account closure request.
We remain committed to responsible gambling principles and take such concerns seriously. However, based on the documented communication history, we believe the account was handled in accordance with user instructions as they were presented at the time.
Every player confirms and accepts the Terms & Conditions during registration before using the platform and making deposits. These Terms clearly state that refunds are generally not possible once deposited funds or bonuses have been used for gameplay, except in cases of proven technical issues.
After reviewing the player’s account activity, we confirmed that the deposits and bonuses were actively used for gaming activity. Therefore, in accordance with the accepted Terms & Conditions and refund policy, the refund request cannot be approved.
We are, of course, open to further review if additional evidence is provided that shows a clear, unconditional self-exclusion request that was not processed in line with our policy.
Kind regards,
Spinfin Casino Team
Hello Tomas,
Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this case.
After reviewing all available internal records linked to the email addresses provided, we would like to present a clear summary of events and our findings.
The player initially contacted us requesting account closure and referencing gambling-related concerns on March 31.
During the same period, multiple follow-up conversations show the player also actively requested bonuses, free spins, and retention offers.
In several instances, the player explicitly responded to closure-related communication with requests to keep the account open in exchange for promotional offers.
The account was subsequently closed after further communication, in line with the final closure request received and confirmed with the player.
It is important to highlight that our team cannot reasonably treat a case as a confirmed self-exclusion request when the communication from the player is inconsistent and includes simultaneous requests for account retention benefits (such as bonuses and VIP offers). In such situations, we proceed cautiously, prioritising documented user intent and ensuring that any action taken reflects the most recent and explicit request from the player.
At no point was the player encouraged or required to continue playing. Promotional offers are part of standard communications and are not intended to override or discourage a valid and unambiguous self-exclusion request. When a clear and final closure request was established, the account was closed accordingly.
We found that the deposits were made while the account was still open and before we received a clear and final self-exclusion request that met our responsible gambling process. We also saw that the player used bonuses during this time. As the deposit has already been used, we are not able to refund it.
The player states that she repeatedly requested a ban due to gambling addiction and believes that receiving promotional offers during that period was inappropriate. However, at the same time, she was also requesting refunds or compensation in the form of bonuses with low wagering requirements, which is inconsistent with a clear and unconditional account closure request.
We remain committed to responsible gambling principles and take such concerns seriously. However, based on the documented communication history, we believe the account was handled in accordance with user instructions as they were presented at the time.
Every player confirms and accepts the Terms & Conditions during registration before using the platform and making deposits. These Terms clearly state that refunds are generally not possible once deposited funds or bonuses have been used for gameplay, except in cases of proven technical issues.
After reviewing the player’s account activity, we confirmed that the deposits and bonuses were actively used for gaming activity. Therefore, in accordance with the accepted Terms & Conditions and refund policy, the refund request cannot be approved.
We are, of course, open to further review if additional evidence is provided that shows a clear, unconditional self-exclusion request that was not processed in line with our policy.
Kind regards,
Spinfin Casino Team