Dear Romi and SlotNeo Team,
Thank you for your response. However, your explanation raises several serious concerns.
First, your justification is inconsistent. Initially, my account was closed due to a Date of Birth discrepancy during KYC. Now, additional reasons such as "abusive betting patterns" and "duplicate accounts" have been introduced. This creates the impression that reasons are being added retrospectively to justify the decision, rather than being the actual cause.
Regarding the Date of Birth issue:
I never intentionally provided incorrect information. The incorrect date was the result of a clear technical issue on your website, which I have demonstrated on video. More importantly, I immediately contacted live chat and requested correction within minutes. This clearly proves there was no intent to mislead.
Most importantly:
I did not gain any advantage from this discrepancy. My identity documents contain my real and correct date of birth, which I submitted during KYC. It would make no logical sense to submit correct documents and at the same time intentionally provide incorrect data.
Regarding the alleged "abusive betting patterns":
You have not provided a single concrete example of what exactly was abusive. All my gameplay was conducted within normal parameters, and I fully complied with the bonus terms. General statements without evidence cannot justify confiscation of winnings.
Regarding the "duplicate account":
The second account was clearly created only to demonstrate a technical issue on your platform. It was not used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage. Treating this as a violation leading to confiscation of winnings is disproportionate and ignores the actual context.
Furthermore, instead of acknowledging a clear system flaw demonstrated by the player, the casino chose to use it as an additional argument against me. This approach is highly questionable.
In summary:
No intentional misrepresentation occurred
No advantage was gained
No concrete evidence of abusive betting was provided
The duplicate account had no impact on gameplay or winnings
I kindly ask the casino to clearly explain:
What exact advantage did I gain from any of the above?
Without demonstrating a tangible advantage or rule violation affecting gameplay fairness, the confiscation of winnings is unjustified.
Additionally, I would like to provide video evidence clearly demonstrating the issue with the Date of Birth field on your website.
In the video, it is clearly visible that the date can be unintentionally changed simply by interacting with the calendar interface, without any confirmation. This is not a matter of user error, but a clear system flaw.
The purpose of creating the test account was solely to document and demonstrate this issue, as there is no other way to show how it occurs. The test account was never used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage.
Furthermore, I have email communication from your support team confirming that the original reason for blocking my account was the Date of Birth discrepancy. No mention of "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" was made at that time.
Introducing new reasons only at this stage raises serious concerns about the consistency and validity of your decision.
Once again, I would like to emphasize that:
I did not gain any advantage from this issue
I reported the problem immediately
I provided accurate identity documents
Instead of acknowledging a clear technical flaw, the casino is now using it as an argument against the player, which is highly questionable.
Please find the video evidence here:
Finally, I would like to highlight a significant inconsistency.
In the original communication from your support team, as well as in your response on Trustpilot, the reason for blocking my account was clearly stated as the Date of Birth discrepancy. At no point were "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" mentioned.
Only now, during this complaint process, additional reasons are being introduced. This raises serious concerns about the consistency and credibility of the casino’s position.
I have been involved in online gambling for many years, and I must admit that it is highly unusual to see new accusations appear at a later stage, especially when the original reason was clearly defined.
What is even more concerning is that I demonstrated a clear technical issue on your platform, with the intention of explaining and helping to identify the problem. Instead of acknowledging this, the casino is now using it as an additional argument against me.
This approach raises serious questions about the fairness and integrity of the casino’s actions in this case.
https://imgur.com/a/pO2ymeX
Dear Romi and SlotNeo Team,
Thank you for your response. However, your explanation raises several serious concerns.
First, your justification is inconsistent. Initially, my account was closed due to a Date of Birth discrepancy during KYC. Now, additional reasons such as "abusive betting patterns" and "duplicate accounts" have been introduced. This creates the impression that reasons are being added retrospectively to justify the decision, rather than being the actual cause.
Regarding the Date of Birth issue:
I never intentionally provided incorrect information. The incorrect date was the result of a clear technical issue on your website, which I have demonstrated on video. More importantly, I immediately contacted live chat and requested correction within minutes. This clearly proves there was no intent to mislead.
Most importantly:
I did not gain any advantage from this discrepancy. My identity documents contain my real and correct date of birth, which I submitted during KYC. It would make no logical sense to submit correct documents and at the same time intentionally provide incorrect data.
Regarding the alleged "abusive betting patterns":
You have not provided a single concrete example of what exactly was abusive. All my gameplay was conducted within normal parameters, and I fully complied with the bonus terms. General statements without evidence cannot justify confiscation of winnings.
Regarding the "duplicate account":
The second account was clearly created only to demonstrate a technical issue on your platform. It was not used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage. Treating this as a violation leading to confiscation of winnings is disproportionate and ignores the actual context.
Furthermore, instead of acknowledging a clear system flaw demonstrated by the player, the casino chose to use it as an additional argument against me. This approach is highly questionable.
In summary:
No intentional misrepresentation occurred
No advantage was gained
No concrete evidence of abusive betting was provided
The duplicate account had no impact on gameplay or winnings
I kindly ask the casino to clearly explain:
What exact advantage did I gain from any of the above?
Without demonstrating a tangible advantage or rule violation affecting gameplay fairness, the confiscation of winnings is unjustified.
Additionally, I would like to provide video evidence clearly demonstrating the issue with the Date of Birth field on your website.
In the video, it is clearly visible that the date can be unintentionally changed simply by interacting with the calendar interface, without any confirmation. This is not a matter of user error, but a clear system flaw.
The purpose of creating the test account was solely to document and demonstrate this issue, as there is no other way to show how it occurs. The test account was never used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage.
Furthermore, I have email communication from your support team confirming that the original reason for blocking my account was the Date of Birth discrepancy. No mention of "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" was made at that time.
Introducing new reasons only at this stage raises serious concerns about the consistency and validity of your decision.
Once again, I would like to emphasize that:
I did not gain any advantage from this issue
I reported the problem immediately
I provided accurate identity documents
Instead of acknowledging a clear technical flaw, the casino is now using it as an argument against the player, which is highly questionable.
Please find the video evidence here:
Finally, I would like to highlight a significant inconsistency.
In the original communication from your support team, as well as in your response on Trustpilot, the reason for blocking my account was clearly stated as the Date of Birth discrepancy. At no point were "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" mentioned.
Only now, during this complaint process, additional reasons are being introduced. This raises serious concerns about the consistency and credibility of the casino’s position.
I have been involved in online gambling for many years, and I must admit that it is highly unusual to see new accusations appear at a later stage, especially when the original reason was clearly defined.
What is even more concerning is that I demonstrated a clear technical issue on your platform, with the intention of explaining and helping to identify the problem. Instead of acknowledging this, the casino is now using it as an additional argument against me.
This approach raises serious questions about the fairness and integrity of the casino’s actions in this case.
https://imgur.com/a/pO2ymeX