Thank you for your replies.
After reviewing all the evidence you submitted during the investigation of your case, we need to clarify that your first account closure request from 20 May does not qualify as a self-exclusion request, as it did not mention any gambling addiction or gambling-related problems.
In that request, you stated that you wanted your account to be blocked because you had lost too much money and had not received any winnings. Please note that, in cases involving refund requests related to self-exclusion, we need clear evidence that the player explicitly informed the casino about gambling-related problems and requested protection due to them.
You only mentioned psychological anxiety and a loss of control related to gambling in your later request from 25 May. The casino closed your account on 26 May, one day after receiving this request. Please note that, in most casinos, self-exclusion requests are handled manually by the responsible departments, and this process requires some time to ensure that requests are reviewed and implemented appropriately.
Based on the available evidence, we consider that Sankra Casino acted within a reasonable timeframe by restricting your account access after receiving a clear self-exclusion request. Therefore, the casino cannot be held responsible for the deposits you made while the request was being processed.
As a result, you are unfortunately not eligible for a refund of these deposits. Regrettably, I have no choice but to reject your complaint as unjustified.
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Thank you for your replies.
After reviewing all the evidence you submitted during the investigation of your case, we need to clarify that your first account closure request from 20 May does not qualify as a self-exclusion request, as it did not mention any gambling addiction or gambling-related problems.
In that request, you stated that you wanted your account to be blocked because you had lost too much money and had not received any winnings. Please note that, in cases involving refund requests related to self-exclusion, we need clear evidence that the player explicitly informed the casino about gambling-related problems and requested protection due to them.
You only mentioned psychological anxiety and a loss of control related to gambling in your later request from 25 May. The casino closed your account on 26 May, one day after receiving this request. Please note that, in most casinos, self-exclusion requests are handled manually by the responsible departments, and this process requires some time to ensure that requests are reviewed and implemented appropriately.
Based on the available evidence, we consider that Sankra Casino acted within a reasonable timeframe by restricting your account access after receiving a clear self-exclusion request. Therefore, the casino cannot be held responsible for the deposits you made while the request was being processed.
As a result, you are unfortunately not eligible for a refund of these deposits. Regrettably, I have no choice but to reject your complaint as unjustified.
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
