Thank you for all the information and evidence provided, Reybets Casino Team
Dear scottyc,
Thank you for your patience while I reviewed all the information and supporting evidence provided by the casino and you.
After carefully assessing the case, I must conclude that we are unable to uphold your complaint.
The decisive issue is the identity document you submitted during the verification process. The casino provided evidence demonstrating that the document was not genuine, and you subsequently acknowledged in this complaint thread that it had been created using AI.
Submitting a fabricated or fake identity document is a serious breach of not only the casino’s but also the industry's standard verification and security rules. Regardless of why you submitted it or whether you acted out of panic, knowingly providing a falsified document cannot be regarded as an acceptable response to a verification request. Your explanation does not change the nature or seriousness of this violation.
The fact that the casino promotes itself as a "no-KYC" platform does not mean that verification can never be requested. As clearly indicated in the information you quoted, the casino may require additional verification when activity is identified as high-risk or unusual. In this case, the multiple-account and security concerns provided a legitimate basis for initiating additional checks.
I also reviewed the casino’s evidence concerning the linked accounts. The accounts were created within a very short period, shared matching IP and user-agent information, accessed the casino through a VPN or proxy, and claimed promotional offers. Although an IP-address match or the use of a VPN would not necessarily prove multiple-account activity on its own, the combination of these factors is consistent with the indicators commonly associated with coordinated or syndicate account usage intended to exploit casino promotions.
I must also note that you initially stated that you had never used a VPN or other IP-masking software. You later acknowledged using a proxy or Norton service to conceal your IP address. This inconsistency further weakens your explanation of the technical links identified by the casino.
Nevertheless, even if the multiple-account connection could not be established with absolute certainty, your admitted submission of a fabricated identity document constitutes a sufficiently serious and independent violation to justify the casino’s decision. A player cannot reasonably expect a casino to approve a substantial withdrawal after knowingly attempting to complete its security verification with a falsified document.
For these reasons, I consider the casino’s actions justified and since you clearly breached the rules will close this complaint as Rejected – Unjustified.
Based on the evidence provided and your explicit admission that you submitted a fabricated identity document, we have no legitimate basis whatsoever to challenge the casino’s decision or request payment of the disputed winnings.
You are entitled to disagree with our conclusion and may pursue your case with the casino’s licensing authority or another competent body in your jurisdiction.
Should you receive a formal ruling in your favour, you may forward it to me at michal.k@casino.guru for review.
I strongly recommend that you never submit altered, fabricated, or otherwise inauthentic documents to any operator in the future, regardless of the circumstances.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Thank you for all the information and evidence provided, Reybets Casino Team
Dear scottyc,
Thank you for your patience while I reviewed all the information and supporting evidence provided by the casino and you.
After carefully assessing the case, I must conclude that we are unable to uphold your complaint.
The decisive issue is the identity document you submitted during the verification process. The casino provided evidence demonstrating that the document was not genuine, and you subsequently acknowledged in this complaint thread that it had been created using AI.
Submitting a fabricated or fake identity document is a serious breach of not only the casino’s but also the industry's standard verification and security rules. Regardless of why you submitted it or whether you acted out of panic, knowingly providing a falsified document cannot be regarded as an acceptable response to a verification request. Your explanation does not change the nature or seriousness of this violation.
The fact that the casino promotes itself as a "no-KYC" platform does not mean that verification can never be requested. As clearly indicated in the information you quoted, the casino may require additional verification when activity is identified as high-risk or unusual. In this case, the multiple-account and security concerns provided a legitimate basis for initiating additional checks.
I also reviewed the casino’s evidence concerning the linked accounts. The accounts were created within a very short period, shared matching IP and user-agent information, accessed the casino through a VPN or proxy, and claimed promotional offers. Although an IP-address match or the use of a VPN would not necessarily prove multiple-account activity on its own, the combination of these factors is consistent with the indicators commonly associated with coordinated or syndicate account usage intended to exploit casino promotions.
I must also note that you initially stated that you had never used a VPN or other IP-masking software. You later acknowledged using a proxy or Norton service to conceal your IP address. This inconsistency further weakens your explanation of the technical links identified by the casino.
Nevertheless, even if the multiple-account connection could not be established with absolute certainty, your admitted submission of a fabricated identity document constitutes a sufficiently serious and independent violation to justify the casino’s decision. A player cannot reasonably expect a casino to approve a substantial withdrawal after knowingly attempting to complete its security verification with a falsified document.
For these reasons, I consider the casino’s actions justified and since you clearly breached the rules will close this complaint as Rejected – Unjustified.
Based on the evidence provided and your explicit admission that you submitted a fabricated identity document, we have no legitimate basis whatsoever to challenge the casino’s decision or request payment of the disputed winnings.
You are entitled to disagree with our conclusion and may pursue your case with the casino’s licensing authority or another competent body in your jurisdiction.
Should you receive a formal ruling in your favour, you may forward it to me at michal.k@casino.guru for review.
I strongly recommend that you never submit altered, fabricated, or otherwise inauthentic documents to any operator in the future, regardless of the circumstances.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru