I made a €20 deposit and received an €80 bonus. I completed the wagering requirements for the bonus.
After completing the wagering, I played Venice Instant Blackjack and later requested a €1,000 withdrawal.
PartySpinz refused the withdrawal and confiscated my winnings. According to their support, I violated a rule stating that bets of 30% or more of the relevant amount are not allowed. They told me that this rule applies to deposits, gift bonuses and cashbacks.
When I asked which bet caused the violation, they identified one €11 bet on Venice Instant Blackjack. They also told me that a single bet is enough to invalidate the winnings.
However, I was playing with the €80 bonus at that stage. If the 30% rule was applied to the €80 bonus, the limit would be €24, meaning that the €11 bet was below the stated limit.
PartySpinz also returned my original €20 deposit to my balance after confiscating the winnings. Because the minimum withdrawal amount was €100, I had to play those €20 again and subsequently lost them.
I asked PartySpinz to find an amicable solution, but they refused.
I would like Casino Guru to review whether PartySpinz correctly applied the 30% betting rule in my case, whether the rule was still applicable after I had completed the wagering requirements, and whether confiscating the entire €1,000 in winnings was justified.
I am requesting the return of the €1,000 in confiscated winnings.
I made a €20 deposit and received an €80 bonus. I completed the wagering requirements for the bonus.
After completing the wagering, I played Venice Instant Blackjack and later requested a €1,000 withdrawal.
PartySpinz refused the withdrawal and confiscated my winnings. According to their support, I violated a rule stating that bets of 30% or more of the relevant amount are not allowed. They told me that this rule applies to deposits, gift bonuses and cashbacks.
When I asked which bet caused the violation, they identified one €11 bet on Venice Instant Blackjack. They also told me that a single bet is enough to invalidate the winnings.
However, I was playing with the €80 bonus at that stage. If the 30% rule was applied to the €80 bonus, the limit would be €24, meaning that the €11 bet was below the stated limit.
PartySpinz also returned my original €20 deposit to my balance after confiscating the winnings. Because the minimum withdrawal amount was €100, I had to play those €20 again and subsequently lost them.
I asked PartySpinz to find an amicable solution, but they refused.
I would like Casino Guru to review whether PartySpinz correctly applied the 30% betting rule in my case, whether the rule was still applicable after I had completed the wagering requirements, and whether confiscating the entire €1,000 in winnings was justified.
I am requesting the return of the €1,000 in confiscated winnings.