Dear CasinoGuru team,
Thank you for allowing us to provide further clarification on this case.
After a comprehensive internal review, we confirm that the player’s bonus and related balance were rightfully confiscated due to deliberate and clearly identifiable promotional abuse, in full compliance with our published Bonus T&C, accepted prior to participation.
Player History and Risk Management Review
It is important to stress that Nitrobet consistently adopts a fair, balanced, and player-friendly approach, even in situations involving potentially abusive gameplay patterns. In mid-November, our Risk Management Team formally flagged the player’s gameplay behavior, identifying a recurring strategy commonly associated with promotional abuse in crash-style games.
The internal assessment at that time concluded the following:
- The player was using crash games with extremely low risk settings in combination with large deposits and large deposit bonuses, aiming to generate disproportionately high balances.
- Such gameplay is commonly used to store value while playing with bonus funds, before attempting to claim that value later through wagering-contributing games.
- While this type of play can theoretically result in either wins or losses, the gameplay pattern was already consistent with known promotional abuse strategies.
Despite this internal warning, the Risk Management Team explicitly noted that confiscating balances at that stage would have been inappropriate, as the behavior was still considered borderline.
Good Faith Measures Taken by the Casino
Following this review, Nitrobet made a conscious and documented decision to act in good faith.
- The player was personally contacted by our team via phone call, email, and WhatsApp.
- These communications indicated cooperative behavior and an apparent intention to continue playing fairly.
- Based on this interaction, we chose to give the player the benefit of the doubt, allowing withdrawals to be processed and gameplay to continue without restrictions.
In addition, prior to the current incident, the casino took further discretionary measures in good faith toward the player. As a goodwill gesture, and purely in the context of customer service, the player was temporarily granted enhanced VIP privileges following a significant win earlier in November. This action was unrelated to bonus eligibility, wagering conditions, or risk assessment, and was taken solely to ensure a smooth withdrawal experience at that time. These actions clearly demonstrate that Nitrobet did not act prematurely, arbitrarily, or aggressively, but instead exercised restraint, flexibility, and fairness over an extended period.
Why This Case Is Different
In the present instance, however, the player’s behavior escalated beyond any reasonable ambiguity.
The gameplay followed a clear, structured, and intentional pattern, specifically:
- Bonus wagering was conducted on a game that does not contribute to wagering requirements, effectively storing value while playing with bonus funds.
- Immediately after obtaining a favorable outcome, the player switched to a game that does contribute to wagering, attempting to claim that previously stored value.
- This behavior corresponds directly to promotional abuse as defined in our Bonus T&C, and does not constitute casual betting and playing.
At the time of intervention, the balance was still entirely bonus-related and had not been legitimately converted into real money.
Relevant Bonus Terms & Conditions
The player’s actions constitute a direct breach of the following sections of our Bonus T&C:
Section 13
Our Promotions and Bonuses are designed for entertainment purposes only. If the Bonus or deposited amount is not used for casual betting and playing, such actions may be considered violations of the Terms, and the casino may withhold any winnings resulting from the Bonus and/or exclude the player from further promotions.
Section 14 – Promotional Abuse
Any attempt at promotional abuse is strictly forbidden and may result in voiding promotions, confiscation of winnings derived from them, and exclusion from future promotions.
Section 14.1
Storing value in games while playing with bonus funds, which value is to be claimed later when there is no active bonus, is strictly prohibited.
Section 15
The casino reserves the right to exclude a player from receiving any Bonus or Promotion at any time, based on its absolute discretion.
Conclusion
- The casino acted with patience, proportionality, and good faith, even after early internal warnings.
- The confiscation was executed before any valid conversion of bonus funds into real money.
- Given the player’s history and the clarity of the strategy applied, this case represents intentional promotional abuse, as defined in the accepted Bonus T&C.
For these reasons, Nitrobet maintains that the complaint is unfounded, and that the action taken was fully justified and contractually supported.
Kind regards
Nitrobet
Dear CasinoGuru team,
Thank you for allowing us to provide further clarification on this case.
After a comprehensive internal review, we confirm that the player’s bonus and related balance were rightfully confiscated due to deliberate and clearly identifiable promotional abuse, in full compliance with our published Bonus T&C, accepted prior to participation.
Player History and Risk Management Review
It is important to stress that Nitrobet consistently adopts a fair, balanced, and player-friendly approach, even in situations involving potentially abusive gameplay patterns. In mid-November, our Risk Management Team formally flagged the player’s gameplay behavior, identifying a recurring strategy commonly associated with promotional abuse in crash-style games.
The internal assessment at that time concluded the following:
- The player was using crash games with extremely low risk settings in combination with large deposits and large deposit bonuses, aiming to generate disproportionately high balances.
- Such gameplay is commonly used to store value while playing with bonus funds, before attempting to claim that value later through wagering-contributing games.
- While this type of play can theoretically result in either wins or losses, the gameplay pattern was already consistent with known promotional abuse strategies.
Despite this internal warning, the Risk Management Team explicitly noted that confiscating balances at that stage would have been inappropriate, as the behavior was still considered borderline.
Good Faith Measures Taken by the Casino
Following this review, Nitrobet made a conscious and documented decision to act in good faith.
- The player was personally contacted by our team via phone call, email, and WhatsApp.
- These communications indicated cooperative behavior and an apparent intention to continue playing fairly.
- Based on this interaction, we chose to give the player the benefit of the doubt, allowing withdrawals to be processed and gameplay to continue without restrictions.
In addition, prior to the current incident, the casino took further discretionary measures in good faith toward the player. As a goodwill gesture, and purely in the context of customer service, the player was temporarily granted enhanced VIP privileges following a significant win earlier in November. This action was unrelated to bonus eligibility, wagering conditions, or risk assessment, and was taken solely to ensure a smooth withdrawal experience at that time. These actions clearly demonstrate that Nitrobet did not act prematurely, arbitrarily, or aggressively, but instead exercised restraint, flexibility, and fairness over an extended period.
Why This Case Is Different
In the present instance, however, the player’s behavior escalated beyond any reasonable ambiguity.
The gameplay followed a clear, structured, and intentional pattern, specifically:
- Bonus wagering was conducted on a game that does not contribute to wagering requirements, effectively storing value while playing with bonus funds.
- Immediately after obtaining a favorable outcome, the player switched to a game that does contribute to wagering, attempting to claim that previously stored value.
- This behavior corresponds directly to promotional abuse as defined in our Bonus T&C, and does not constitute casual betting and playing.
At the time of intervention, the balance was still entirely bonus-related and had not been legitimately converted into real money.
Relevant Bonus Terms & Conditions
The player’s actions constitute a direct breach of the following sections of our Bonus T&C:
Section 13
Our Promotions and Bonuses are designed for entertainment purposes only. If the Bonus or deposited amount is not used for casual betting and playing, such actions may be considered violations of the Terms, and the casino may withhold any winnings resulting from the Bonus and/or exclude the player from further promotions.
Section 14 – Promotional Abuse
Any attempt at promotional abuse is strictly forbidden and may result in voiding promotions, confiscation of winnings derived from them, and exclusion from future promotions.
Section 14.1
Storing value in games while playing with bonus funds, which value is to be claimed later when there is no active bonus, is strictly prohibited.
Section 15
The casino reserves the right to exclude a player from receiving any Bonus or Promotion at any time, based on its absolute discretion.
Conclusion
- The casino acted with patience, proportionality, and good faith, even after early internal warnings.
- The confiscation was executed before any valid conversion of bonus funds into real money.
- Given the player’s history and the clarity of the strategy applied, this case represents intentional promotional abuse, as defined in the accepted Bonus T&C.
For these reasons, Nitrobet maintains that the complaint is unfounded, and that the action taken was fully justified and contractually supported.
Kind regards
Nitrobet