Dear memoble,
Thank you for your message.
I understand that this situation has been ongoing for quite some time and that it is frustrating, especially when you feel you have already provided sufficient documentation to confirm your identity.
That said, the casino’s current request appears to be related specifically to Source of Wealth verification under AML regulations, rather than proof of identity. While you mentioned that you do not receive unemployment benefits, the casino also indicated that alternative documentation may be accepted — such as proof of savings or any official document demonstrating how the funds were obtained.
Even if the amount in question may not seem significant from your perspective, casinos operating under AML obligations are often required to request supporting documentation once a review has been triggered, particularly if previous crypto-related verification could not be fully confirmed.
At this stage, in order to move the complaint forward and avoid further delays, I would recommend considering whether you are able to provide any official documentation that explains the origin of the funds (e.g., bank statements showing accumulated savings, transaction history demonstrating long-term crypto holdings, or similar).
Please let me know whether you would be willing to submit any additional documents, or if you would like me to clarify with the casino what specific alternatives would be acceptable in your case.
I look forward to your response.
Dear memoble,
Thank you for your message.
I understand that this situation has been ongoing for quite some time and that it is frustrating, especially when you feel you have already provided sufficient documentation to confirm your identity.
That said, the casino’s current request appears to be related specifically to Source of Wealth verification under AML regulations, rather than proof of identity. While you mentioned that you do not receive unemployment benefits, the casino also indicated that alternative documentation may be accepted — such as proof of savings or any official document demonstrating how the funds were obtained.
Even if the amount in question may not seem significant from your perspective, casinos operating under AML obligations are often required to request supporting documentation once a review has been triggered, particularly if previous crypto-related verification could not be fully confirmed.
At this stage, in order to move the complaint forward and avoid further delays, I would recommend considering whether you are able to provide any official documentation that explains the origin of the funds (e.g., bank statements showing accumulated savings, transaction history demonstrating long-term crypto holdings, or similar).
Please let me know whether you would be willing to submit any additional documents, or if you would like me to clarify with the casino what specific alternatives would be acceptable in your case.
I look forward to your response.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin