Hello everyone, my name is Matej and I will be taking this complaint over from my colleague Peter. I will do my best to help the mediation process to move towards successful resolution.
Dear LuckyAnon Casino, I have now familiarised myself with this complaint, and there seems to be several issues regarding your statements. I would also like to apologise in advance, if the below sounds hostile. It is not meant as such. It is hard to state facts without sounding rude or accusatory, in written form. Please, bear this in mind going forward. Thank you.
France is a restricted jurisdiction under our license.
This is correct. Since registration does not require to input any personal details (neither does the profile section), and deposits/withdrawals are initiated via anonymous crypto wallets, the only way to prevent players registering from restricted countries is to apply regional lock.
I have accessed your website with French VPN and registered an account with no issue, not even a pop up informing me of France being restricted. I am able to deposit and play as a regular user.
I can also confirm that our review of your casino is from 31st January 2026, and at the time France has not been on the list of restricted countries in your T&C, which implies those have been added only recently.
The breach is circumvention of a restricted geography.
This is the point regarding player's VPN usage. I have found an internal note from your affiliation team, dated 22nd April 2026, stating that VPN is allowed. Also, I have not been able to see any term within T&C stating VPN to be prohibited.
The withdrawal triggered additional compliance obligations.
This point is meant mainly for FiLouYe to provide context - this is a standard AML procedure, that all casinos have to comply with, as it is governed by international law. Any large deposit and withdrawal requests needs to be verified, to prevent money laundering and terrorist funding. Your withdrawal is falling under this category due to the sheer amount, and this was to be expected.
Outcome required by our license.
This is incorrect. Voiding player's balnce and refunding the deposit was purely decision made by the casino management. Regarding players engaging with the casino from restricted terriroty, Anjouan Authority states the following:
- NOTICE TO PLAYERS: Participation in internet gaming from the aforementioned territories is strictly prohibited. Individuals accessing this site from excluded jurisdictions do so at their own risk. The Anjouan Gaming Board and the Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority hereby declare that any disputes, claims, or complaints arising from players situated within these territories fall entirely outside the regulatory scope of the Anjouan Internet Gaming License and will not be entertained.
With the above in mind, it seems like the casino has not implemented any regional locks and the security team only checks accounts withdrawing larger amounts of money. This is seen by Casino Guru as insufficient security on the casino's side, as it allows players from prohibited countries to register, deposit money, play and even withdraw smaller amounts of money, without triggering KYC verification. If this player have not won large amount, I assume he would be allowed to play further without intervention, despite playing from prohbited territory.
Therefore, unless new evidence is provided, I believe the player is entitled to his winnings and would recommend returning the voided amount to his e-wallet, then subsequently close his account in line with the new list of restricted countries and VPN usage. I would also recommend to implement regional blocks for restricted countries, as well as adding clear statement about VPN being allowed - or not - into the general T&C, for future reference.
In case you have further evidence or a different solution in mind, feel free to contact me via e-mail at matej.l@casino.guru, or reply directly to this thread. Thank you.
Hello everyone, my name is Matej and I will be taking this complaint over from my colleague Peter. I will do my best to help the mediation process to move towards successful resolution.
Dear LuckyAnon Casino, I have now familiarised myself with this complaint, and there seems to be several issues regarding your statements. I would also like to apologise in advance, if the below sounds hostile. It is not meant as such. It is hard to state facts without sounding rude or accusatory, in written form. Please, bear this in mind going forward. Thank you.
France is a restricted jurisdiction under our license.
This is correct. Since registration does not require to input any personal details (neither does the profile section), and deposits/withdrawals are initiated via anonymous crypto wallets, the only way to prevent players registering from restricted countries is to apply regional lock.
I have accessed your website with French VPN and registered an account with no issue, not even a pop up informing me of France being restricted. I am able to deposit and play as a regular user.
I can also confirm that our review of your casino is from 31st January 2026, and at the time France has not been on the list of restricted countries in your T&C, which implies those have been added only recently.
The breach is circumvention of a restricted geography.
This is the point regarding player's VPN usage. I have found an internal note from your affiliation team, dated 22nd April 2026, stating that VPN is allowed. Also, I have not been able to see any term within T&C stating VPN to be prohibited.
The withdrawal triggered additional compliance obligations.
This point is meant mainly for FiLouYe to provide context - this is a standard AML procedure, that all casinos have to comply with, as it is governed by international law. Any large deposit and withdrawal requests needs to be verified, to prevent money laundering and terrorist funding. Your withdrawal is falling under this category due to the sheer amount, and this was to be expected.
Outcome required by our license.
This is incorrect. Voiding player's balnce and refunding the deposit was purely decision made by the casino management. Regarding players engaging with the casino from restricted terriroty, Anjouan Authority states the following:
- NOTICE TO PLAYERS: Participation in internet gaming from the aforementioned territories is strictly prohibited. Individuals accessing this site from excluded jurisdictions do so at their own risk. The Anjouan Gaming Board and the Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority hereby declare that any disputes, claims, or complaints arising from players situated within these territories fall entirely outside the regulatory scope of the Anjouan Internet Gaming License and will not be entertained.
With the above in mind, it seems like the casino has not implemented any regional locks and the security team only checks accounts withdrawing larger amounts of money. This is seen by Casino Guru as insufficient security on the casino's side, as it allows players from prohibited countries to register, deposit money, play and even withdraw smaller amounts of money, without triggering KYC verification. If this player have not won large amount, I assume he would be allowed to play further without intervention, despite playing from prohbited territory.
Therefore, unless new evidence is provided, I believe the player is entitled to his winnings and would recommend returning the voided amount to his e-wallet, then subsequently close his account in line with the new list of restricted countries and VPN usage. I would also recommend to implement regional blocks for restricted countries, as well as adding clear statement about VPN being allowed - or not - into the general T&C, for future reference.
In case you have further evidence or a different solution in mind, feel free to contact me via e-mail at matej.l@casino.guru, or reply directly to this thread. Thank you.