Summary of Events:
Account Registration and Initial Verification: I registered an account with Legendz under my correct and legal name. Shortly after, and before accumulating any significant winnings, I successfully completed a full identity verification through their required third-party provider, Veriff. My account was fully verified and in good standing.
Gameplay and Winnings: Following the successful Veriff verification, I continued to play on the platform, assuming my account was fully compliant. I accumulated winnings equivalent to $800+ USD in Sweepstakes Coins.
Withdrawal Request and Second Verification: When I initiated a redemption request for my $800, Legendz did not process the withdrawal. Instead, they required me to undergo a second, separate, in-house KYC process. I complied fully and submitted all requested documentation for a second time.
Confiscation After Second Verification: Only after I had passed both the initial Veriff verification and their subsequent in-house KYC check did Legendz abruptly close my account and confiscate my entire $800+ balance. The reason cited was a multi-account breach.
Core of the Dispute:
The casino's actions represent a clear case of procedural unfairness and bad faith.
Implied Acceptance: By subjecting me to and passing me through the initial, rigorous Veriff verification, Legendz formally accepted my account as valid. They had all the information necessary to identify any alleged link to another account at that stage.
Predatory Timing: The casino allowed me to continue depositing and playing after this initial verification was complete. They only chose to enforce their multi-account rule during the withdrawal process, after I had already won. This creates a "no-win" situation for the player, where an account is considered valid for taking deposits but invalid for paying out winnings.
Double Verification: Forcing a second KYC process at the point of redemption, only to then close the account, strongly suggests that their verification system is not used for due diligence but as a tool to delay and deny legitimate withdrawals. They had two clear opportunities to close the account before I won, but failed to do so.
The casino cannot retroactively apply its terms after having twice verified my identity and accepted my wagers in good faith. This is a predatory practice designed to protect the house from winners.
Desired Resolution:
I request full payment of my legitimate winnings of $800. Legendz verified my account not once, but twice, and should be required to honor the wagers made and won while the account was in a verified state.
Summary of Events:
Account Registration and Initial Verification: I registered an account with Legendz under my correct and legal name. Shortly after, and before accumulating any significant winnings, I successfully completed a full identity verification through their required third-party provider, Veriff. My account was fully verified and in good standing.
Gameplay and Winnings: Following the successful Veriff verification, I continued to play on the platform, assuming my account was fully compliant. I accumulated winnings equivalent to $800+ USD in Sweepstakes Coins.
Withdrawal Request and Second Verification: When I initiated a redemption request for my $800, Legendz did not process the withdrawal. Instead, they required me to undergo a second, separate, in-house KYC process. I complied fully and submitted all requested documentation for a second time.
Confiscation After Second Verification: Only after I had passed both the initial Veriff verification and their subsequent in-house KYC check did Legendz abruptly close my account and confiscate my entire $800+ balance. The reason cited was a multi-account breach.
Core of the Dispute:
The casino's actions represent a clear case of procedural unfairness and bad faith.
Implied Acceptance: By subjecting me to and passing me through the initial, rigorous Veriff verification, Legendz formally accepted my account as valid. They had all the information necessary to identify any alleged link to another account at that stage.
Predatory Timing: The casino allowed me to continue depositing and playing after this initial verification was complete. They only chose to enforce their multi-account rule during the withdrawal process, after I had already won. This creates a "no-win" situation for the player, where an account is considered valid for taking deposits but invalid for paying out winnings.
Double Verification: Forcing a second KYC process at the point of redemption, only to then close the account, strongly suggests that their verification system is not used for due diligence but as a tool to delay and deny legitimate withdrawals. They had two clear opportunities to close the account before I won, but failed to do so.
The casino cannot retroactively apply its terms after having twice verified my identity and accepted my wagers in good faith. This is a predatory practice designed to protect the house from winners.
Desired Resolution:
I request full payment of my legitimate winnings of $800. Legendz verified my account not once, but twice, and should be required to honor the wagers made and won while the account was in a verified state.