Hi antzi28,
Thank you for the additional explanation and for keeping me informed about the developments.
I understand why this situation feels unfair to you, and I acknowledge that your account has now been closed. However, after reviewing all the materials you provided, we need to clarify our position regarding the refund request.
Casino Guru is able to assist with refund-related cases only when a valid self-exclusion request due to gambling addiction was clearly submitted and ignored by the casino. In your case, although you requested account closure and used general wording such as wanting to be "banned from gambling sites," your messages did not explicitly state gambling addiction as the reason, nor did they clearly request self-exclusion for a defined period.
From a mediation perspective, this distinction is crucial. Account closure does not carry the same obligations for the casino and does not automatically entitle a player to a refund of subsequent losses. Self-exclusion due to gambling addiction must be clearly and explicitly stated so that the casino can recognize it as such and act accordingly.
Because gambling addiction was not clearly mentioned in your original requests, we cannot consider them valid self-exclusion requests under our methodology. As a result, we are unable to assist you in obtaining a refund for the losses incurred before the account was eventually closed.
We understand that this outcome is disappointing, but we hope this explanation clarifies why we are unable to intervene further in this case. For future reference, we strongly recommend always stating self-exclusion due to gambling addiction clearly and explicitly, and keeping proof of such requests.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Veronika
Casino.Guru Team
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Hi antzi28,
Thank you for the additional explanation and for keeping me informed about the developments.
I understand why this situation feels unfair to you, and I acknowledge that your account has now been closed. However, after reviewing all the materials you provided, we need to clarify our position regarding the refund request.
Casino Guru is able to assist with refund-related cases only when a valid self-exclusion request due to gambling addiction was clearly submitted and ignored by the casino. In your case, although you requested account closure and used general wording such as wanting to be "banned from gambling sites," your messages did not explicitly state gambling addiction as the reason, nor did they clearly request self-exclusion for a defined period.
From a mediation perspective, this distinction is crucial. Account closure does not carry the same obligations for the casino and does not automatically entitle a player to a refund of subsequent losses. Self-exclusion due to gambling addiction must be clearly and explicitly stated so that the casino can recognize it as such and act accordingly.
Because gambling addiction was not clearly mentioned in your original requests, we cannot consider them valid self-exclusion requests under our methodology. As a result, we are unable to assist you in obtaining a refund for the losses incurred before the account was eventually closed.
We understand that this outcome is disappointing, but we hope this explanation clarifies why we are unable to intervene further in this case. For future reference, we strongly recommend always stating self-exclusion due to gambling addiction clearly and explicitly, and keeping proof of such requests.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Veronika
Casino.Guru Team
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
