Dear Egofist,
Thank you for providing the additional information.
After reviewing all the details available in this complaint, we are unfortunately unable to support your case.
You confirmed that you created a new account after your original account was self-excluded, using a different email address. You also stated that the casino did not collect or verify any personal information on your original account, and therefore, there were no verified personal details that could have been used to link your new account to the previously self-excluded account.
We acknowledge that you used the same cryptocurrency wallet for deposits and withdrawals. However, the wallet address alone cannot be considered sufficient evidence to establish that the new account belonged to the same person who previously requested self-exclusion. A cryptocurrency wallet address is not verified personal information, and without additional identifying data connected to the original account, it cannot reliably confirm the identity of the account holder.
A wallet address may serve as an additional indicator in combination with other verified information, but in this case, where no personal information was provided or verified on the original account, the casino had no reasonable way to determine that the newly created account belonged to a previously self-excluded player.
Based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino breached its responsible gambling obligations or that it should be held responsible for the losses incurred on the newly created account.
For this reason, we will be rejecting your complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear Egofist,
Thank you for providing the additional information.
After reviewing all the details available in this complaint, we are unfortunately unable to support your case.
You confirmed that you created a new account after your original account was self-excluded, using a different email address. You also stated that the casino did not collect or verify any personal information on your original account, and therefore, there were no verified personal details that could have been used to link your new account to the previously self-excluded account.
We acknowledge that you used the same cryptocurrency wallet for deposits and withdrawals. However, the wallet address alone cannot be considered sufficient evidence to establish that the new account belonged to the same person who previously requested self-exclusion. A cryptocurrency wallet address is not verified personal information, and without additional identifying data connected to the original account, it cannot reliably confirm the identity of the account holder.
A wallet address may serve as an additional indicator in combination with other verified information, but in this case, where no personal information was provided or verified on the original account, the casino had no reasonable way to determine that the newly created account belonged to a previously self-excluded player.
Based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino breached its responsible gambling obligations or that it should be held responsible for the losses incurred on the newly created account.
For this reason, we will be rejecting your complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
