I am submitting a complaint regarding the confiscation of my €1910.08 balance by Betninja.
The casino claims that I violated the €5 maximum bet rule while a bonus was active. While I acknowledge that a small number of bets exceeded this limit, the decision to confiscate the entire balance is disproportionate and unfair.
Based on the official game history provided by the casino:
• My balance had already increased from €50 to €367.62 before any bet exceeding €5 was placed
• The first bet above €5 occurred on March 12, 2026 at 09:51:08 with a €6 bet
• This means that €317.62 in winnings was generated fully in compliance with the bonus terms
Additionally:
• After the higher bets occurred, I continued playing again with bets at or below the €5 limit
• Therefore, a significant portion of the balance was also generated while complying again with the rules
Furthermore, the casino system allowed bets above €5 to be placed without any warning, restriction, or prevention mechanism. Many regulated casinos block such bets automatically while a bonus is active. Allowing these bets and then confiscating the entire balance raises serious concerns about fairness and system design.
The relevant term states that winnings "may be lost" in case of violation. However, this does not justify a full confiscation of all funds, especially those clearly generated in compliance with the rules.
Despite requesting a proportional review, the casino refused further discussion and stated their decision is final.
I am therefore requesting a fair and proportional resolution, where at minimum the €317.62 in legitimate winnings is returned, along with a review of additional winnings generated after returning to compliant bet sizes.
I have provided full documentation including game history and correspondence
I am submitting a complaint regarding the confiscation of my €1910.08 balance by Betninja.
The casino claims that I violated the €5 maximum bet rule while a bonus was active. While I acknowledge that a small number of bets exceeded this limit, the decision to confiscate the entire balance is disproportionate and unfair.
Based on the official game history provided by the casino:
• My balance had already increased from €50 to €367.62 before any bet exceeding €5 was placed
• The first bet above €5 occurred on March 12, 2026 at 09:51:08 with a €6 bet
• This means that €317.62 in winnings was generated fully in compliance with the bonus terms
Additionally:
• After the higher bets occurred, I continued playing again with bets at or below the €5 limit
• Therefore, a significant portion of the balance was also generated while complying again with the rules
Furthermore, the casino system allowed bets above €5 to be placed without any warning, restriction, or prevention mechanism. Many regulated casinos block such bets automatically while a bonus is active. Allowing these bets and then confiscating the entire balance raises serious concerns about fairness and system design.
The relevant term states that winnings "may be lost" in case of violation. However, this does not justify a full confiscation of all funds, especially those clearly generated in compliance with the rules.
Despite requesting a proportional review, the casino refused further discussion and stated their decision is final.
I am therefore requesting a fair and proportional resolution, where at minimum the €317.62 in legitimate winnings is returned, along with a review of additional winnings generated after returning to compliant bet sizes.
I have provided full documentation including game history and correspondence