Dear Tomas,
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this complaint.
After a thorough investigation, we can confirm that the rejection of this player's verification and the voiding of the associated winnings were the direct result of a confirmed breach of our Terms of Service — specifically, the creation and use of multiple accounts.
When the player requested a withdrawal, a standard KYC verification was triggered, as is common industry practice and required under our AML and responsible gaming obligations. Risk-based verification at the point of withdrawal is explicitly provided for in our Terms, which every user accepts upon registration; the absence of KYC at deposit does not waive it.
During this verification, our system flagged the player's submission as a duplicate. A manual review confirmed that the account is linked to another, previously verified account on our platform through: an exact facial biometric match, an identical government-issued ID document number, and an identical date of birth. In other words, the same individual had already completed KYC under a different account, and then registered a new account — which is strictly prohibited under our multi-accounting policy.
Winnings generated on a duplicate account are void under our Terms. As a goodwill gesture, we offered to return the player's full principal deposit, which remains available to them.
We reject the characterization of this as "bait and switch" or confiscation. The enforcement action was based solely on multi-account abuse, not on the size of the win. We have submitted complete evidence, including account identifiers, verification records, and biometric match results, to the CasinoGuru team privately for independent review.
We remain available for any further questions.
Kind regards,
BC.Game Team
Dear Tomas,
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this complaint.
After a thorough investigation, we can confirm that the rejection of this player's verification and the voiding of the associated winnings were the direct result of a confirmed breach of our Terms of Service — specifically, the creation and use of multiple accounts.
When the player requested a withdrawal, a standard KYC verification was triggered, as is common industry practice and required under our AML and responsible gaming obligations. Risk-based verification at the point of withdrawal is explicitly provided for in our Terms, which every user accepts upon registration; the absence of KYC at deposit does not waive it.
During this verification, our system flagged the player's submission as a duplicate. A manual review confirmed that the account is linked to another, previously verified account on our platform through: an exact facial biometric match, an identical government-issued ID document number, and an identical date of birth. In other words, the same individual had already completed KYC under a different account, and then registered a new account — which is strictly prohibited under our multi-accounting policy.
Winnings generated on a duplicate account are void under our Terms. As a goodwill gesture, we offered to return the player's full principal deposit, which remains available to them.
We reject the characterization of this as "bait and switch" or confiscation. The enforcement action was based solely on multi-account abuse, not on the size of the win. We have submitted complete evidence, including account identifiers, verification records, and biometric match results, to the CasinoGuru team privately for independent review.
We remain available for any further questions.
Kind regards,
BC.Game Team