Hello,
I would like to clearly summarize the reason why the casino refused to pay out my winnings and why I believe their actions constitute an unfair and misleading practice.
The casino justified the confiscation of my winnings by claiming that I breached several bonus terms, specifically:
- exceeding the stated €2 maximum bet limit while an active bonus was present,
- playing games that were allegedly restricted under the bonus terms,
- and using a live casino bonus in a manner they later deemed non-compliant.
Based on these claims, the casino declared my winnings invalid and confirmed this as their final decision. While my original deposit of £200 was returned, my total winnings of €3900 were fully confiscated and never paid out.
However, during gameplay, the casino’s own system allowed all of these actions to occur:
- bets above €2 were technically permitted,
- restricted slot and live casino games were fully accessible,
- and no warnings, alerts, or automatic restrictions were shown at any time.
Additionally, after I requested a withdrawal, I contacted the casino via live chat multiple times. On each occasion, I was informed that my withdrawal was "being processed," and I was also told that withdrawals were limited to €1000 per transaction. At no point during this period was I informed of any alleged bonus violation.
Only after this processing period did the casino change its position and claim bonus breaches, resulting in the confiscation of my entire winnings. This indicates that the withdrawal was initially accepted and reviewed as valid before being retroactively rejected.
In my view, this constitutes retroactive enforcement of bonus terms. Restricted actions should be prevented in real time by the casino’s system, not allowed during gameplay, accepted at withdrawal stage, and only later punished.
Even if a bonus rule breach had occurred, confiscating the entire winnings is disproportionate, especially when the casino’s own technical controls failed to prevent the situation. Many reputable operators would, at most, remove the bonus rather than void all winnings.
For these reasons, I believe the casino’s conduct represents an unfair commercial practice rather than a legitimate enforcement of bonus terms.
Kind regards,
****
Hello,
I would like to clearly summarize the reason why the casino refused to pay out my winnings and why I believe their actions constitute an unfair and misleading practice.
The casino justified the confiscation of my winnings by claiming that I breached several bonus terms, specifically:
- exceeding the stated €2 maximum bet limit while an active bonus was present,
- playing games that were allegedly restricted under the bonus terms,
- and using a live casino bonus in a manner they later deemed non-compliant.
Based on these claims, the casino declared my winnings invalid and confirmed this as their final decision. While my original deposit of £200 was returned, my total winnings of €3900 were fully confiscated and never paid out.
However, during gameplay, the casino’s own system allowed all of these actions to occur:
- bets above €2 were technically permitted,
- restricted slot and live casino games were fully accessible,
- and no warnings, alerts, or automatic restrictions were shown at any time.
Additionally, after I requested a withdrawal, I contacted the casino via live chat multiple times. On each occasion, I was informed that my withdrawal was "being processed," and I was also told that withdrawals were limited to €1000 per transaction. At no point during this period was I informed of any alleged bonus violation.
Only after this processing period did the casino change its position and claim bonus breaches, resulting in the confiscation of my entire winnings. This indicates that the withdrawal was initially accepted and reviewed as valid before being retroactively rejected.
In my view, this constitutes retroactive enforcement of bonus terms. Restricted actions should be prevented in real time by the casino’s system, not allowed during gameplay, accepted at withdrawal stage, and only later punished.
Even if a bonus rule breach had occurred, confiscating the entire winnings is disproportionate, especially when the casino’s own technical controls failed to prevent the situation. Many reputable operators would, at most, remove the bonus rather than void all winnings.
For these reasons, I believe the casino’s conduct represents an unfair commercial practice rather than a legitimate enforcement of bonus terms.
Kind regards,
****
Edited by a Casino Guru admin