We've thoroughly reviewed Spartan Slots Casino and gave it a good reputation rating. It's generally a good casino to play at, but there are some things worth noting. In our review, we've considered the casino's player complaints, estimated revenues, license, games genuineness, customer support quality, fairness of terms and conditions, withdrawal and win limits, and other factors. Spartan Slots Casino is related to other online casinos listed below and its rating is also positively influenced by them. Read the full review below and learn more about this casino.
According to our research and estimates, Spartan Slots Casino is a medium-sized online casino revenue-wise. The revenue of a casino is an important factor, as bigger casinos shouldn't have any issues paying out big wins, while smaller casinos could potentially struggle if you manage to win really big.
We currently have 7 complaints directly about this casino in our database, as well as 21 complaints about other casinos related to it. Because of these complaints, we've given this casino 3,052 black points in total, out of which 2,640 come from related casinos. You can find more information about all of the complaints and black points below.
Warning: Spartan Slots Casino has certain sections of Terms and Conditions that we consider to be unfair to the casino's players. Because of this, we advise you to look for a casino with fair rules or at least pay special attention to this casino's Terms and Conditions if you decide to play at it.
Spartan Slots Casino appears on 2 blacklists, but they haven't influenced our rating of this casino. We've chosen to ignore them either because they're related to the casino's previous owner, or because some other applicable reasons.
Spartan Slots Casino is a good online casino. We've given it this rating because we think it's doing many things well, however, there is something holding it back from getting a very good or perfect reputation rating from us. Even despite that, you can expect this casino to be a good place to play at.
Browse an overview of payment methods supported by Spartan Slots Casino, along with related limits and fees associated with transactions to or from your casino account.
Limits & fees
Limits & fees
|Bank wire||Not Available||
|5 - 7 days|
Browse all bonuses offered by Spartan Slots Casino, including their no deposit bonus offers and first deposit welcome bonuses. You will see bonuses available to players from your country first, but you can also click the button below to see offers meant for players from other countries. Just keep in mind that you will not be able to use those.
Take a look at the explanation of factors that we consider when calculating the reputation rating of Spartan Slots Casino. The reputation rating is the main metric we use to describe the trustworthiness, fairness, and quality of all online casinos in our database.
The player was accused of breaching the casino's bonus rules due to a high betting pattern. The player claimed they wouldn't bet higher than €5 because they wouldn't want to lose their winnings. The casino didn't respond to their complaint and it remained unresolved.
The player complained about declined payment from his bonus winnings for the reason of violating maximal bet. Player did not agree and casino responded that they would review this complaint. There is no new info since then.
The player complained about delayed payment of his winnings where casino firstly declined his payment for the reason of random verification process. After this process, the casino became unresponsive and withdrawal was still pending. The casino did not respond to this complaint.
The player complained about delayed payment from this casino. He made a withdrawal and before it, he had sent his verification documents which were approved. Casino responded that the customer was selected for the random verification process. There is no more news about this complaint.
The player complained about delayed payment, he contacted the casino by email but did not receive any useful information. The casino did not respond to this complaint.
The player's winnings from a bonus were confiscated. The casino stated that the player is from a country that cannot claim any no deposit bonus, but it wasn't stated in the list of restricted countries in the casino's bonus terms and conditions. No more details are available after that. This complaint remained unresolved.
The casino accused the player of violating the maximum bet rule of a bonus even though he played with cash funds. His winnings were voided and deposits were returned to him. He also mentioned he had a bad experience with the whole casino group. No further details are available and the complaint remains unresolved.
This complaint was unclear because the way the player wrote it was a bit chaotic. We do not know why the casino closed his account and if they had any reason to do so. No reaction from casino came, therefore we consider this case as uncertain.
The player requested a withdrawal and was asked by the casino to provide documents for their account verification. About three months after that, the player received a letter that stated their name was on a list called "Negative Casino Database". According to the player, that wasn't true because they didn't play at any casino for 4-5 months. Ever since then, there's no further information available.
The player from Australia had their winnings cancelled without further explanation.
The player 'btownie' won AUD 2.500 and requested a withdrawal. While the request was still pending the player accepted a new bonus sent by the casino. The casino voided the withdrawal because the player breached the bonus T&C. There was supposed to be a pop-up window saying the withdrawal would be voided if the player accepted the bonus, however, the player was sure there was no such message. The fact that the terms of a new promotion should have no influence on a pending withdrawal was pointed out to the casino but they refused to change their position.
The player requested a self-exclusion and her account was closed. A week later, however, she was able to access her account and play. She made a deposit and lost the money. After she pointed out that they were not supposed to let her play, the casino said she should've sent a filled out form for her self-exclusion request to be complete. They refunded some of the deposits she made after the initial self-exclusion request but only partially and based on the payment method used.
The player "disgusted" had winnings voided for accepting and using a free bonus while having a pending withdrawal. The mediator agreed that using a violation on a current bonus to invalidate historically compliant winnings was non-valid, but said that they had discussed this issue many times previously with the casino and would unfortunately not be able to help.
The casino has this rule of '...not claiming a bonus while there's a pending payout request' which the player was not aware of. This rule would be fair if it concerned only the bonuses taken subsequently, but should not influence the pending withdrawals. This was not the first time the casino voided pending winnings because of this rule but they refused to change their position.
The player requested a withdrawal but after the verification process casino declined the payment. When the player contacted the casino they informed the player that he was not going to be paid for the reason of betting pattern.
The player complained he had issues with the casino and withdrawing his winning. Casino flagged his account as fraudulent. The player was very unhappy because this was the second account verification and the first was successful.
The player complained that the casino confiscated his winnings from the bonus and returned a deposit. Casino accused him of violating bonusT&C more precisely maximal allowed bet. Player said that in their T&C was written that MAXIMUM bet allowed was $6.50 per SPIN and he did not play slots but baccarat which didn't have spins. The casino did not respond to this complaint.
Casino closed player's account for the reason of violating the terms and conditions with no further explanation. The casino did not react to this complaint.
The player from United States is highly disappointed with time-consuming KYC procedures. Casino didn't respond.
The player requested a withdrawal of 410 USD. Later, he used several promotional codes for free bonuses offered by the casino. The casino cancelled the withdrawal and seized the player's funds because they di not allow players to have an active bonus while requesting a withdrawal.
Player from the US was complaining that a minor jackpot had been decreasing up and down and something like this should not happen. The casino admitted this technical glitch and they returned him some of the deposits. Later casino explained that it was not an error but a common behaviour of the system. The player did not agree and he's been still waiting for the rest of his deposits.
The player from the USA won 875 USD and requested a withdrawal. The casino had an issue with the verification documents provided as the player did not own any passport. Later, the casino sent a part of the withdrawal amount to the player and was still waiting for him to provide the requested documents. The player did not confirm whether he was eventually paid the rest of his winnings but from the last comments in the complaint thread, it was clear that he intended to provide the documents.
The player was complaining that casino had closed his account and confiscated the whole balance after the account verification. The casino was unresponsive to this complaint.
Player was complaining that after he sent the necessary documentation to the casino he received an email from a different casino's email address stating his documents didn't pass the verification process. After, his account was locked. The player didn't understand the reason, no reply from the casino, no more update.
Player was complaining about a declined payment. Casino accused him of breaching terms and conditions. Player said the rules changed after he had already won the disputed amount. Casino reviewed the player's account and insisted that the player was fraudulent. Player refused this, no proofs from the casino, no more update.
The player from Czech Republic has been accused of opening multiple accounts. His account was closed and winnings from No Deposit bonus cancelled. The casino made a mistake while checking the player's documents (the casino thought that Poruba is a different city than Prague, but in reality, Poruba is a part of Prague) and asked for a passport, when the player clearly stated, that he doesn't travel and his passport is expired. So the casino gave the player a chance to upload new documents, which the player did. The casino refused them saying they are the same documents as previously sent, but we received the same email too, and it was clear to see that new documents were submitted. After confronting the casino about this fact, the representative, unfortunately, stopped replying to the complaint and we were forced to close it as unresolved.
Player was complaining that the casino had refused several of his withdrawals, unclear case, no reply from the casino.