Campeonbet Casino Review

The player from Germany had registered and deposited 70€ at Campeonbet despite being self-excluded due to a gambling addiction. The player had believed that Campeonbet should have recognized the self-exclusion and prevented the registration and deposit. She had provided evidence of her self-exclusion at multiple partner casinos. However, the casino had refused to refund her deposit, arguing that they did not have a uniform system for recognizing self-exclusions from partner casinos. We had explained to the player that self-exclusion at one casino did not automatically apply to all associated casinos, especially those licensed by Curacao. As the player's account had already been closed, we concluded that there was not much more we could do, and the complaint was rejected.

The player from Sweden described repeated withdrawal attempts that had been canceled within 24 hours, each time requesting different documents for verification. Despite already having his documents accepted and his account fully KYC verified, his withdrawal was still pending and had been for over a week. The player had cooperated fully with the casino's requests and had played a variety of games, including sports betting, using both his own funds and bonuses. His account balance stood at €1635.56, and he was attempting to withdraw €1000, which was the maximum limit. However, despite the casino approving his bank statement, his withdrawal remained in 'pending' status. The Complaints Team had advised the player to wait for at least 14 days after requesting the withdrawal before submitting a complaint. As the player failed to respond to the team's messages within the given timeframe, the complaint was rejected.

The player from Italy, who had previously created an account and deposited 30 Euros, had been unable to access his account as it seemed to have disappeared from the server. However, the issue was promptly resolved and the player confirmed this. Consequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Ontario had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hadn't been received yet. The player had previously made a successful withdrawal of $500, but subsequent attempts to withdraw the remaining $2000 had been repeatedly rejected by the casino. Despite our team's efforts to resolve the issue with the casino, they did not respond. We had advised the player to contact the responsible gaming authority, Antillephone N.V. (Curacao), and marked the complaint as 'unresolved' in our system.

The player from Poland had completed a lengthy verification process and had been approved, but was unsuccessful in making withdrawals. This issue had ultimately led to account closure. Despite no acknowledgement of regulation breaches, the casino had stopped responding to his emails. The Complaints Team had attempted to contact the casino several times but received no response. As a result, the complaint had been marked as 'unresolved', which could have negatively affected the casino's rating. The player had been advised to contact the Curaçao/Antillephone Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player complained that after he'd sent all notarized documents and his account got verified, his withdrawal request got rejected and the casino told him they would get it touch. However, he said that they never did and his account had been closed without informing him about it. The casino didn't react to this complaint and it remained unresolved.

A player from Brazil has been experiencing multiple difficulties in withdrawing his winnings from a casino's sports section. Despite completing the KYC and providing a series of documents, the casino continually requests more proof of ID and has cancelled withdrawal requests several times. The complaint was rejected as the player stopped responding.

A player from Malta is struggling to withdraw his funds from CampeonBet, despite being fully verified. The withdrawal process has taken more than a month at the time of submitting the complaint, and the casino keeps refusing to provide a specific timeframe for the payout. The complaint has been closed as 'unresolved' because the casino failed to reply and cooperate in resolving the complaint.

The player 'KAJEEN85' from Germany wanted to withdraw their winnings of €3.950,00. The player has had their documents verified and have sent numerous emails to the support but received only a general email about confirming the documents, bank details, and so on. The player believed that the casino was not taking their emails seriously and didn't want to pay their winnings. There was no reaction from the casino and this complaint was closed as unresolved.

The player from Mexico was experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. After she passed KYC, the withdrawal has been processed. However, it is not clear what is the issue with the crypto withdrawal that she received and the circumstances around the issue. The complaint was closed with the note "rejected" because the player stopped responding to our messages and questions. In one of her last posts, she asked us to keep the complaint non-public.

The player from Germany has been accused of breaching sports betting rules. The casino voided all associated winnings. We were forced to reject this complaint as we are not able to help with sports betting complaints.

The player from Macedonia is not able to withdraw his winnings. The casino would like to perform a video call, however the player doesn't speak English. We ended up closing the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.

The player from Germany is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing additional verification. We ended up closing the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.

The player from Germany had his winnings capped due to a rule about lifetime deposit. Despite number of attempts, the casino did not respond and we were forced to close this complaint as 'unresolved' with classification 'against fair gambling'.

A player from Macedonia complained about having a delayed withdrawal due to his account being in the verification process for more than a month. The casino didn't tell him what was the issue and they refused to assist with this complaint. No more updates since then.

The player from Germany didn’t receive the bonus he activated. The player lost the deposit before we managed to help, therefore he lost the right to that offer, and we were forced to reject this complaint.

In this complaint, the player had requested a permanent account closure because of his gambling addiction. He came back after a few days and asked for the opening of his closed account. The casino did open his account and the player accomplished a deposit. The player was asking for his deposit to be refunded back. The casino responded and redirected him to the regulatory authority. Askgamblers closed this complaint as unresolved because of unwillingness from CampeonBet Casino for further cooperation in getting this complaint adequately reviewed and decided.

The player from Sweden had not received a €1000 withdrawal despite the 72-hour timeframe passing, and he was not receiving any answers from the casino. His account was verified, and all documents had been accepted. The issue was resolved after the player confirmed that his case had been addressed. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved' in their system.

The player from Germany highlighted a history of self-exclusion due to gambling addiction but noted that LCS Ltd. Group allowed account openings despite this. They were currently trying to prove their self-exclusion requests and mentioned an ignored request from 2022 at Nordscasino. The player sought restitution for amounts totaling 100€, 2700€, and 500€. The issue was resolved, and the player confirmed that a refund was received. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved' in their system and offered assistance for any future issues.

The player from Germany is facing delay in withdrawing their €172. They received an email from the casino stating that their request is under review by another department due to heavy workload. The complaint was resolved as the player received his money.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. Even though we have not managed to receive any response from the casino, the player eventually received their withdrawals and the case is resolved.

The player from Germany had faced a delay in receiving a promised refund of €355.00 from Betsamigo due to a self-ban from a partner casino. Despite having been informed that the refund would take 1-2 days, the player hadn't received it. After discussing the situation with us, she had decided to wait for another day. Later, she confirmed that she had received the refund, and we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Ireland has requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden is complaining about the casino requiring too many verification documents. After the player sent all the necessary documents, his account was verified and he received his winnings.

The player from the Netherlands was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The player confirmed that his issue was resolved before we invited the casino to the thread. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Germany requested a withdrawal, but it hasn't been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden has faced repeated attempts at verifying his account for withdrawal at Evobet, even after providing extensive identification proof. Despite getting verified, his last withdrawal request was canceled and he was again asked for a selfie verification. We tried to contact the casino, but before it replied, the player informed us that the case had already been solved, so we closed the complaint with "resolved" status.

The player from Italy requested a withdrawal, but it was canceled. The casino asked him to provide additional documents for verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Poland had his fully verified account suspended by the casino without any explanation. His withdrawal request, which was dated 28/03, had been pending and the casino had stopped communicating. The player had been involved in sports betting and hadn't had any active bonuses. The casino had responded to the player's email, stating that his withdrawal request was being reviewed and that his account had been closed in accordance with their terms and conditions. After a few weeks, the player reported that the casino had paid him, which resolved the issue.

The player from Sweden requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Lower Saxony submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany has requested a withdrawal one month prior to submitting this complaint and , unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. We closed this complaint as "resolved" since the player informed us later about successfully getting his money.

The player from the Netherlands is experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to ongoing verification. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Canada had experienced delays with his withdrawal request of 492.75 from the online casino. Despite having successfully withdrawn funds in January 2024, his request was pending for two weeks without any updates or requests for additional documents. He confirmed that he had completed a full KYC verification and provided all necessary documents. The player did not use any bonus and played Live Blackjack and Sportsbook. After our intervention and communication with the casino, the player received his payment and decided to close his account. The issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from British Columbia has requested a withdrawal of CAD$1000 multiple times, but it has been continuously revoked for KYC. Despite having his KYC approved several times, the withdrawal remains in the queue to be processed as per a live chat agent. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.

The player from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Denmark won CAD 500 but the casino was continuously requesting additional documents for their deposit, despite having provided all possible documents from their Skrill account. We contacted the casino, but before it replied to our message, the player informed us about the successful verification of their account and receiving the winnings. We closed the complaint as resolved.

The player's account was under investigation for over 3 months without any update regarding it's status. The casino informed the player that upon completing the investigation, some of the player's bets had been voided but that they were now able to make a withdrawal. Upon receipt of all outstanding payments, the issue was resolved.

The player from Germany was complaining about the lengthy verification process. Moreover, the player's winnings were confiscated. The complaint was temporarily closed as unresolved because it was reported to ADR, and we were waiting for the official results of its investigation. We reopened the complaint after being provided with the ADR's final decision. Although ADR decided in the favour of the player, the casino stopped responding and has not followed the instructions made by the authority while the complaint was open. Later, when the player contacted us regarding another and different issue in the casino, he confirmed that he received the disputed funds approximately 2 weeks after the complaint was closed as unresolved. The complaint is resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has been blocked during the verification process. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the Netherlands has experienced a technical glitch. After cancelling a withdrawal, his winnings disappeared completely instead of showing up back in the balance. The player managed to sort the issue out with the casino’s support.

The player from Canada had experienced a delay in his withdrawal of 250 CAD from an online casino. The casino had advertised a 48-hour withdrawal process, but it had taken 13 days for the player to receive his money. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the misleading information provided by the casino. The complaint had been resolved after the player confirmed receipt of his winnings.

The player from Austria had difficulty withdrawing winnings from a casino and sought assistance. The player's account verification was delayed due to a lack of utility bills in his name, despite providing a bank statement. After a period of inactivity and further communication, the player's account was eventually verified, and he successfully withdrew the first €1,000. The remaining €1,000 was also received shortly thereafter. The complaint was resolved as the player confirmed receiving all his winnings.