U tom smislu, rekao bih da sam početnik kada je u pitanju RAZED.
Mislim da je iznos jednog depozita oko 1000 dolara.
Na primer, ako je iznos jedne opklade 5 dolara za ovaj iznos, onda je razumljiva logika da je iznos depozita veliki u poređenju sa iznosom opklade.
Međutim, uložio sam nekoliko desetina dolara, tako da ne mislim da je to mnogo. Po ovoj ceni, 1.000 dolara je nivo gde možete sve izgubiti ako nemate sreće.
I da li to znači da ne možete verovati kazinu osim ako ga ne „testirate"?
Nije dostupno u RAZED-u, ali drugi kazina nude stvari poput 100% bonusa na vaš prvi depozit od 1.000 dolara, zar ne?
Sve su to bonusi za „nove igrače".
Iako postoje uslovi, mnogi igrači sa finansijskim sredstvima će uplatiti i do 1.000 dolara.
Međutim, da li je uobičajeno da se uplati mali iznos kao „proba" jer postoji mogućnost da vam isplata bude odbijena?
Da li RAZED nije siguran u svoju platformu i traži da se ona „testira" jer može biti problema?
Kažu da je to relativno kratak vremenski period, ali ako izgubite sav novac morate da uplatite 1.000 dolara, tako da, kao što je gore pomenuto, stopa znači da ćete brzo izgubiti sav novac, tako da zaista ne razumem poentu te tvrdnje.
Malo je preterivanje reći da nije normalno da „novi igrači" ne „testiraju" licencirani kazino iako su mu upravo verovali i uplatili depozit.
Mušterije uplaćuju depozite na osnovu poverenja između kazina i mušterije, ali ova teorija bi uništila odnos kazina sa svim igračima.
U prethodnom odgovoru sam rekao da ne volim blekdžek uživo i objasnio zašto.
Osnovna premisa je da ne priznajem da je nadoknada nesrazmerno visoka u poređenju sa iznosom koji sam trebalo da dobijem.
Pošto ne znam koliki će biti bonus, da li je to negde navedeno na sajtu?
Da li otkrivate stvari poput formule za izračunavanje bonusa?
Nikad ga nisam video, tako da ne znam koliki bonus dobijaš.
Samo sam igrao normalno i dobio bonus kada su mi ga dali.
Tvrdim da je to proračunata strategija jer samo moji prijatelji i ja igramo ovu igru.
Ako ste znali za grešku, zašto to ne biste uradili sa većom grupom?
Ovo je samo moje lično mišljenje, tako da ne znam da li je ispravno, ali kako god da gledate na to, zar ljudi koji zaista igraju strateški nisu oni koji okupljaju mnogo ljudi da igraju ili prodaju informacije o greškama?
In that sense, I would say I'm a beginner when it comes to RAZED.
I think the amount of a single deposit is around $1000.
For example, if the amount of a single bet is $5 for this amount, then the logic is understandable that the deposit amount is large compared to the bet amount.
However, I bet a few dozen dollars, so I don't think it's a lot. At this rate, $1,000 is a level where you can lose it all if you're unlucky.
And does that mean that you can't trust a casino unless you "test" it?
It's not available at RAZED, but other casinos offer things like a 100% bonus on your first deposit of $1,000, right?
These are all "new player" bonuses.
Although there are conditions attached, many players with financial means will deposit up to $1,000.
However, is it common to deposit a small amount as a "test" because there is a possibility that your withdrawal may be rejected?
Is RAZED not confident in their platform and asking for it to be "tested" because there may be issues?
They say it's a relatively short period of time, but if you lose all your money you have to deposit $1,000, so as mentioned above, the rate means you'll lose all your money quickly, so I don't really understand the point of that claim.
It's a bit of an exaggeration to say that it's not normal for "new players" to not "test" a licensed casino even though they just trusted it and made a deposit.
Customers make deposits based on the trust between the casino and the customer, but this theory would destroy the casino's relationship with all players.
In my previous reply, I said that I don't like live blackjack and explained why.
The basic premise is that I do not recognize that the compensation is disproportionately high compared to the amount I should have received.
Because I don't know how much the bonus will be, is it stated anywhere on the site?
Do you disclose things like the bonus calculation formula?
I've never seen it so I don't know how much of a bonus you get.
I just played normally and received the bonus when they gave it to me.
I claim it's a calculated strategy because only my friends and I play this game.
If you knew about the bug, why not do it with a larger group?
This is just my personal opinion, so I don't know if it's correct, but no matter how you look at it, aren't the people who really play strategically the ones who gather a lot of people to play or sell bug information?
その言い方ですとRAZEDについては初心者になると思います。
一回の入金額については$1000ぐらいだと思います。
たとえばこの金額にたいして1回のベット額が$5とかならばベット額に対して入金額が大きいという理論は理解できます。
しかし私は数十ドルのベットをするので決して多いとは思いません。このぐらいのレートですと$1000は運が悪いとすぐ全損するレベルです。
それに「テスト」をしないと信用ならないカジノということですか?
RAZEDにはないですが他のカジノで初回入金ボーナス$1000の100%ボーナスとかたとえばありますよね?
これは皆「新規プレイヤー」に対するボーナスです。
資金力があるプレイヤーなら条件が付くとは言え普通にMAX$1000入金する人もたくさんいます。
なのにもしかしたら出金拒否される可能性があるから「テスト」で少額入金するのが一般的ですか?
RAZEDは問題が発生する可能性があるから「テスト」してくれと自分のプラットフォームに自信がないんですか?
比較的短期間って言いますけど全損したら$1000を入金するので前述の通りレート的にすぐ全損するので本当にその主張は意味がわかりません。
ライセンスがあるカジノを信用して入金しただけなのに「新規プレイヤー」が「テスト」しないのは一般的ではない。は暴論すぎますよ。
カジノと顧客の信頼関係で入金してるのにその理論だと全てのプレイヤーとのカジノの関係が破綻します。
ライブブラックジャックは好きじゃないと前回の返信で理由とともに送ってます。
大前提として「報酬が本来受け取るべき金額と比べ不釣り合いに高額」なんて認識してません。
なぜならボーナスがどのくらい貰えるのか知らないし、サイトのどこかに記載してありますか?
ボーナスの計算式?みたいなのは公表してるんですか?
私は見たことがないのでどのぐらいボーナスが貰えるのかなんて知りません。
普通に遊んでそちらが付与してきたらボーナスを貰っただけです。
私と友達だけがこのゲームで遊んでいるから計算された戦略だと主張ですが。
バグを知っていたならもっと大人数でやりませんか?
これはただの個人的な意見なので正しいかわかりませんが、どう考えても、たくさん人を集めてプレイするかバグ情報を売ったりするのが本当に戦略的にプレイする人たちじゃないんですか?
Automatski prevedeno: