Neuvottelut ovat monimutkaisia, koska ollaan tekemisissä sekä tosiasioiden että ihmisten kanssa.

Negotiations are complex because one is dealing with both facts and people. It is clear that negotiators above all must have a good understanding of a subject. They must be aware of the company`s general policy, initial bargaining position as well as fallback position.

However, awareness of these facts may not necessarily suffice to reach the agreement. The role of human factor must be taken into account. The approach and strategy in negotiations are influenced by cool, clear logical analyses. But the personal needs of the actors must therefore be considered. These needs might include the need for friendship, goodwill, credibility, recognition of status and authority, a desire to be appreciated and promoted as well as the need to get home earlier on Friday evening.

Researches, who have studied negotiations, recommend separate people from facts. Moreover, while negotiations indirect and impersonal forms should be used. Furthermore, a really tough negotiator should be hard on the facts but soft on the people.

Language also varies according to negotiating style adopted: it can be either a co-operative or a competitive mode. Cooperative style is based on win-win principles when both parties want to benefit from the deal. This style is often accepted within one company or between companies with longstanding relations when common goals are being pursued. Competitive negotiation style can be appropriate for one-off contracts when the aim is to get the best results possible without considering future relations and risks of the breakdown of negotiations. Moreover, the language can become hostile and threatening.

In reality negotiations are a complex mode of co-operative and competitive styles. Negotiating successfully implies dealing with four main components of negotiations: people, facts, co-operation and competition.

I believe your subject is incomplete, but the fact is that in most slot providers this rule does not apply. only a part wins.

if the RTP is more than 90% most of the time and if I believed that this is true, the provider and customers would still get 10%. but I believe that these RTPs do not work in reality, the house always has more than the described rtp, the truth is that the codes and values ​​​​that are applied to the slots lack transparency. some more and some less and the term ''both win'' does not apply to slots. and even in live games if it depends on the croupier's identity, who can guarantee that he doesn't vary the strength of a spin? , direct the turn to a certain sector?.

the only fact that becomes true is that THE HOUSE ALWAYS WINS! and he was not described. must have been taken from an excerpt where the subject is not the forum