Dana 17. juna 2025. godine, uplatio sam 505.97980139 DOGE i dobio „bonus na prvi depozit", bonus od 100% praćen uslovom za klađenje od 40 puta. Da bih ispunio ovaj uslov za klađenje, igrao sam razne kazino igre, prvenstveno blekdžek. Tokom ove sesije igranja, grafička traka napretka koja je predstavljala moje ispunjenje klađenja postepeno se punila dok nije pokazala završetak, jasno ilustrujući da sam uspešno ispunio potrebne uslove za klađenje.
Dana 18. juna 2025. godine, pokrenuo sam isplatu 2.000 DOGE sa svog računa. Međutim, do 21. juna, isplata još uvek nije stigla. Nakon što sam se prijavio na svoj kazino nalog da bih istražio, otkrio sam da je isplata poništena i da je kazino zaplenio sve moje dobitke.
Odmah nakon ovog otkrića, kontaktirao sam korisničku podršku da razjasnim situaciju. Korisnička služba me je obavestila da mi je dobitak zaplenjen zbog mog učešća u igrama uživo u kazinu sa aktivnim bonusom. Međutim, nisam igrao nijednu igru uživo u kazinu tokom svojih sesija.
Štaviše, nakon pregleda Uslova i odredbi kazina, Uslova bonusa i specifičnih uslova vezanih za bonus na prvi depozit, nisam pronašao nijednu odredbu koja eksplicitno zabranjuje igranje uživo dok se koristi aktivni bonus. Suprotno njihovom objašnjenju, Uslovi bonusa direktno navode: „Za sve stolne igre, igre sa živim dilerom, klasične slotove i video poker, 5% igračevog uloga doprinosi uslovu za klađenje", što jasno implicira da igre uživo i stolne igre mogu biti dozvoljene i da se mogu računati, iako delimično, u promet.
Tokom naknadnih razmena, korisnička podrška kazina je potvrdila da se moja istorija igranja sastojala isključivo od igara blekdžeka koje nisu uživo. Ipak, insistirali su da se ove igre „smatraju igrama uživo" i uputili su me nazad na Uslove bonusa. Međutim, pomenuti Uslovi bonusa eksplicitno navode određene ograničene igre, a nijedna od igara u kojima sam učestvovao ne pojavljuje se među tim ograničenim igrama.
Korisnička podrška me je takođe uputila na odredbu koja kaže: „Ostale igre koje nisu pomenute gore, ali imaju unutrašnju mehaniku bonusa ili mogu biti igre sa visokom volatilnošću, takođe mogu biti isključene iz bonus klađenja." Ipak, igre blekdžeka koje sam igrao ne sadrže unutrašnju mehaniku bonusa, niti poseduju posebno visoku volatilnost. Štaviše, ova odredba je dvosmislena, što igračima onemogućava da unapred prepoznaju koje igre kazino može smatrati da spadaju u ove nejasne kategorije.
Tipično, ako su određene igre zabranjene tokom klađenja bonusa, kazina jasno zabranjuju pristup tim igrama sa aktivnim bonusima ili jednostavno isključuju opklade na njih iz doprinosa uslovima klađenja. U ovom scenariju, kazino mi je dozvolio da igram blekdžek igre i čak je prikazao napredak u klađenju na njima.
Konačno, nerazumno je zapleniti moj dobitak zbog činjeničnih netačnosti koje je predstavio tim za podršku i nejasnih, dvosmislenih uslova bonusa. Stoga, zahtevam svoj zakoniti dobitak u ukupnom iznosu od 4.185,16229861 DOGE, koji trenutno zadržava kazino.
Mogu da obezbedim e-mail prepisku sa korisničkom podrškom na zahtev, jer trenutna ograničenja priloga sprečavaju uključivanje dodatnih datoteka u podneti obrazac za žalbu.
On June 17, 2025, I deposited 505.97980139 DOGE and received the "1st Deposit bonus," a 100% match bonus accompanied by a 40x wagering requirement. To fulfill this wagering requirement, I played various casino games, primarily blackjack. Throughout this gaming session, a graphical progress bar representing my wagering fulfillment gradually filled up until it indicated completion, clearly illustrating that I had successfully met the requisite wagering conditions.
On June 18, 2025, I initiated a withdrawal of 2,000 DOGE from my account. However, as of June 21, the withdrawal had still not arrived. Upon logging into my casino account to investigate, I discovered that the withdrawal had been reversed and that all my winnings had been seized by the casino.
Immediately following this discovery, I contacted customer support to clarify the situation. Customer support informed me that my winnings had been seized due to my engagement in live casino games with an active bonus in place. However, I have not played any live casino games at any point during my sessions.
Furthermore, upon examining the casino's Terms and Conditions, Bonus Terms, and the specific terms related to the 1st Deposit bonus, I found no provision explicitly prohibiting live game play while utilizing an active bonus. Contrary to their explanation, the Bonus Terms directly state, "For all table games, live dealer games, classic slots, and video poker, 5% of a Player’s stake contributes towards the wagering requirement," clearly implying that live and table games may be permitted and can count, albeit partially, towards turnover.
During subsequent exchanges, the casino's customer support acknowledged that my play history consisted solely of non-live blackjack games. Still, they insisted these games were "considered as live games" and referred me back to the Bonus Terms. However, the referenced Bonus Terms explicitly list certain restricted games, and none of the games I participated in appear among those restricted titles.
Customer support also referred me to a provision stating, "Other games that are not mentioned above but have inside a bonus mechanic or can be high-volatility games can also be excluded from bonus wagering." Nonetheless, the blackjack games I played contain no internal bonus mechanics, nor do they possess particularly high volatility. Moreover, this provision is ambiguous, making it impossible for players to recognize beforehand which games the casino might consider falling under these vague categories.
Typically, if certain games are disallowed during bonus wagering, casinos clearly prohibit access to those games with active bonuses or simply exclude bets on them from contributing to wagering requirements. In this scenario, the casino allowed me to play the blackjack games and even displayed wagering progress on them.
Conclusively, it is unreasonable to seize my winnings due to the factual inaccuracies presented by the support team and vague, ambiguous bonus terms. Therefore, I am claiming my rightful winnings totaling 4,185.16229861 DOGE, currently being withheld by the casino.
I can provide the email correspondence with customer support upon request, as current attachment limits prevent including additional files within the submitted complaint form.
Automatski prevedeno: