Coinbase CEO optimistic about future of prediction markets

Prediction markets have been a hot-button topic. In France, Polymarket, a prediction market platform, exited almost unprompted, and elsewhere, the company faced unequivocal opposition from regulators.

From Belgium to Singapore, prediction markets have fallen out of grace, classified as unlicensed gambling operations. Yet, not all jurisdictions, or private companies for that matter, espouse this view.

Prediction markets – no telling which way they will go

The United States, for example, is having an "a-ha moment" with the administration of President Donald Trump finding Polymarket and other platforms, such as Kalshi, operating within the law.

President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., has joined Kalshi as a strategic advisor at a time when the company has faced fire from regulators that have ultimately failed to sway the company in its resolve to offer prediction markets on prominent events such as politics.

The latest prominent entrepreneur to chime in on the debate surrounding prediction markets is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong who took a brief moment to comment on prediction markets prompted by a question by an analyst.

Mizuho Securities analyst Dan Dolev asked Armstrong about prediction markets and Coinbase’s intentions towards the segment, using the company’s Q4 earnings calls to address the chief executive, to which he responded:

"I think the world got a bit of a wake-up call on prediction markets in the recent election," Armstrong explained, nodding to the way the US election has generated a sustained interest in prediction platforms.

Traditional sports betting platforms in the United States are not allowed to offer odds on the outcome of an election, as they set the odds themselves, and thus could be seen as undermining the fairness of the election.

Prediction markets, on the flip side, have been known to serve as mediators and adjust the odds based on what their player bases think would happen, while the platform itself just takes a small cut. Besides, prediction markets have been successfully used for research purposes to help inform public opinion.

Fears about bias and misinformation are overblown

Armstrong spoke about how prediction markets have been able to predict many outcomes far more accurately than what other traditional sources have stipulated at the time. This remark is interesting, but some media outlets, including The Economist, have pointed out that their models were not that far off, and that, inherently, prediction markets were visited disproportionately by supporters of one specific outcome.

Armstrong though sought to dismiss some of the fears commonly attributable to prediction markets, such as they could be used to generate "misinformation" and "bias" at a time when these prediction markets actually have every reason to try and get the outcomes right.

Even then, they are not themselves setting the odds but want to ensure that one outcome is not favored by dishonest betting, for example.

Ultimately, Armstrong believes that prediction markets could be "a better source of truth" and are therefore a positive development.

Image credit: Unsplash.com