Rezime situacije:
Osoba, koristeći korisničko ime ro***34, podnela je zvaničnu žalbu kompaniji Winna u vezi sa kvarom u sistemu samoisključivanja platforme, što joj je omogućilo da se kocka uprkos tome što je preduzela aktivne korake da to spreči zbog dijagnostikovane zavisnosti od kockanja.
Pozadina:
Sredinom jula 2025. godine, podnosilac žalbe, koji je bio na terapiji zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, samoisključio se sa Winna-e na šest meseci (do 13. januara 2026. godine). Ova akcija je imala za cilj da blokira sve aktivnosti kockanja na njegovom nalogu. Dok je samoisključivanje ispravno funkcionisalo na drugim platformama za kockanje, na Winna-i nije uspelo.
Problem:
Uprkos obaveštenju o samoisključenju koje se pojavljivalo prilikom prijave, sistem je i dalje dozvolio potpun pristup nakon nekoliko sekundi. Kao što je pokazano na dostavljenom snimku ekrana, podnosilac žalbe je mogao da se prijavi, uplati novac i kladi se u avgustu 2025. godine, što je rezultiralo recidivom nakon tri nedelje apstinencije.
Ključne tačke žalbe:
Sistemski kvar:
Sajt je prvobitno prikazao poruku kojom se potvrđuje period samoisključenja, ali je potom ipak odobrio pristup. Video dokaz podnosioca žalbe pokazuje uspešno prijavljivanje i aktivnost klađenja tokom perioda isključenja.
Eksplicitni zahtev za samoisključivanje:
Pre toga, sredinom jula, podnosilac žalbe je putem Telegrama obavestio predstavnika kompanije Winna da kockanje šteti njegovom životu i zatražio je da se povuče sa turnira i potpuno se samoisključi. Uprkos ovoj eksplicitnoj izjavi, njegov pristup kockanju je ostao aktivan.
Marketinški imejlovi tokom isključenja:
Podnosilac žalbe je nastavio da prima promotivne imejlove sa reklamama za bonuse i ponude. Ove komunikacije, prema Kodeksu prakse Komisije za igre na sreću Tobik (tačka 19.9), trebalo je da budu blokirane za samoisključene korisnike. Jedan od ovih imejlova je navodno izazvao njihov povratak.
Nedosledna primena u različitim proizvodima:
Isključenje se odnosilo samo na određene Winna igre (npr. „Winna Originals"), dok je podnosilac žalbe i dalje mogao da se kocka na sport, kršeći tačku 19.4 Kodeksa prakse, koja zahteva da se samoisključenje dosledno primenjuje na sve proizvode.
Neuspeh u otkrivanju i reagovanju:
Prema tački 19.10 istog Zakonika, ako kupac prekrši svoje isključenje, operater može vratiti depozite po sopstvenom nahođenju. Međutim, podnosilac žalbe tvrdi da nisu namerno prekršili isključenje, već je sistem otkazao i da su sami prijavili problem. Štaviše, njihova kockarska aktivnost tokom isključenja trebalo je da pokrene crvenu zastavicu za osoblje kompanije Winna, posebno zato što su dva puta kontaktirali ćaskanje uživo tokom tog perioda u vezi sa opkladama i bonusima, ali nije došlo do intervencije.
Finansijski uticaj:
Tokom perioda samoisključenja, podnosilac žalbe je uplatio 29.420,24 dolara i podigao 19.924,27 dolara, što je rezultiralo neto gubitkom od 9.495,77 dolara. Podnosilac žalbe zahteva da mu se ovaj iznos nadoknadi, jer su gubici nastali u vreme kada nije trebalo da bude u mogućnosti da se kocka.
Problemi sa eskalacijom žalbi:
Nakon što je savetovano da problem eskalira Komisiji za igre na sreću Tobika, podnosilac žalbe je to i učinio. Komisija za igre na sreću Tobika i Vina nisu odgovorili na početnu žalbu podnetu 09.04.2025.
Traženo rešenje:
Podnosilac žalbe zahteva nadoknadu od 9.495,77 dolara, što predstavlja gubitke pretrpljene dok sistem samoisključenja nije funkcionisao kako je predviđeno. Naglašava da je ova situacija izazvala značajan zastoj u njihovim naporima za oporavak, koji su prethodno dobro napredovali uz terapiju.
Summary of Situation:
The individual, using the username ro***34, has submitted a formal complaint to Winna regarding a failure in the platform’s self-exclusion system, which allowed them to gamble despite having taken active steps to prevent this due to a diagnosed gambling addiction.
Background:
In mid-July 2025, the complainant, who has been in therapy for gambling addiction, self-excluded from Winna for six months (until January 13, 2026). This action was intended to block all gambling activity on their account. While the self-exclusion worked correctly on other gambling platforms, it failed on Winna.
Issue:
Despite the self-exclusion notice appearing upon login, the system still allowed full access after a few seconds. As demonstrated in a submitted screen recording, the complainant was able to log in, deposit money, and place bets in August 2025, resulting in a relapse after three weeks of abstinence.
Key Points of Complaint:
System Failure:
The site initially displayed a message confirming the self-exclusion period but then granted access anyway. The complainant’s video evidence shows successful login and betting activity during the exclusion period.
Explicit Request to Self-Exclude:
Before this, in mid-July, the complainant informed a Winna representative via Telegram that gambling was harming their life and asked to withdraw from a tournament and self-exclude entirely. Despite this explicit statement, their access to gambling remained active.
Marketing Emails During Exclusion:
The complainant continued to receive promotional emails advertising bonuses and offers. These communications, according to the Tobique Gaming Commission’s Code of Practice (Point 19.9), should have been blocked for self-excluded users. One of these emails reportedly triggered their relapse.
Inconsistent Enforcement Across Products:
The exclusion only applied to certain Winna games (e.g., "Winna Originals"), while the complainant was still able to gamble on sports, breaching Point 19.4 of the Code of Practice, which requires self-exclusion to apply consistently across all products.
Failure to Detect and Respond:
Under Point 19.10 of the same Code, if a customer breaches their exclusion, the operator may reimburse deposits at their discretion. However, the complainant argues that they did not deliberately breach the exclusion, rather the system failed, and they themselves reported the issue. Furthermore, their gambling activity during exclusion should have triggered a red flag for Winna’s staff, particularly since they contacted live chat twice during that period about bets and bonuses, but no intervention occurred.
Financial Impact:
During the self-exclusion period, the complainant deposited $29,420.24 and withdrew $19,924.27, resulting in a net loss of $9,495.77. They request that this amount be reimbursed, as the losses were incurred during a time when they should have been unable to gamble.
Complaint Escalation Issues:
After being advised to escalate the issue to the Tobique Gaming Commission, the complainant did so. The Tobique Gaming Commission and Winna have not responded to the initial complaint filed on 04/09/2025.
Resolution Sought:
The complainant requests reimbursement of $9,495.77, representing the losses sustained while the self-exclusion system failed to function as intended. They emphasize that this situation has caused a significant setback in their recovery efforts, which had previously been progressing well under therapy.
Automatski prevedeno: