Dakle, po mom iskustvu, izgleda da je FOS veoma loš u svojim slučajevima i zaista ne znam kako je iko uspeo da pobedi sa njima. 🤔
Imao sam jedan slučaj blokiranja kockanjem zbog lažnog predstavljanja MCC-a.
Onda sam imao još jedan slučaj bez blokade zbog lažnog predstavljanja MCC-a.
Jedan slučaj je presuđen protiv mene jer nisam imao navedenu blokadu, a drugi slučaj je presuđen protiv mene jer jesam imao blokadu i banka nije imala načina da utvrdi da li se radilo o kockanju ili ne, pa zašto je to u redu u obe situacije? Za mene su to kontradiktorne presude, teško da je to pravedan ishod s obzirom na ovo.
So it seems FOS is very floored in it's cases in my experience and I really don't know how anyone has won with them. 🤔
I have had one case gamble block on MCC misrepresentation.
Then I've had another another case no block on MCC misrepresentation.
One case had ruled against me because I didn't have said block on and other case ruled against me because I did have the block on and the bank have no way to determin it was or was not gambling so why is it ok in both situations to me its contradictory on the rulings it's hardy a fair outcome in light of this.
Automatski prevedeno: