EOD Code SRL, operater Slotmonster-a, bavi se problematičnim praksama.
Zbog moje zavisnosti od kockanja, zatražio sam samoisključenje na Slotmonster.com 11. marta 2025. godine, što je operater potvrdio i priznao.
Uprkos tome, 9. aprila 2025. godine, ja sam — na sopstvenu inicijativu i u ranjivom stanju — otvorio novi nalog jednostavno koristeći drugu imejl adresu. Tako sam otkrio da operater lako dozvoljava kreiranje novog naloga čak i ako je zahtev za samoisključenje već podnet.
Evo obrasca koji sam identifikovao:
Nalog, a ne igrač, je isključen: Samo prvobitno isključeni nalog je deaktiviran. Prilikom registracije novog naloga, ne postoji provera da li je igrač već zatražio samoisključenje. Sa istim ličnim podacima (ime, datum rođenja itd.), novi nalog se može lako kreirati — sve što vam je potrebno je druga adresa e-pošte.
Neograničeni depoziti i igra su i dalje mogući: Uprkos aktivnom samoisključenju, mogao sam ponovo da uplatim novac i kockam. Operator nije preduzeo nikakve efikasne mere da trajno blokira isključene igrače od pristupa sajtu.
Isplate su blokirane: Tek kada se podnese zahtev za isplatu, operater vrši detaljniju proveru identiteta. Ako se tada otkrije da je na snazi samoisključenje, isplata se odbija. Prethodno uplaćena sredstva se gube.
Jednostrana prednost za operatera: Ova praksa omogućava operateru da nastavi da prima depozite, a da pritom odbije da isplati dobitke. Ovaj pristup iskorišćava ranjive igrače koji pate od zavisnosti od kockanja.
Zaključak: Na osnovu trenutne situacije, ne očekujem da ću povratiti svoja uplaćena sredstva, jer sam tehnički sam otvorio novi račun. Ipak, važno je podići svest o ovoj praksi, jer ona očigledno krši principe odgovornog kockanja i utvrđene standarde zaštite igrača.
Nadam se da će ove informacije pomoći drugim igračima da ostanu oprezni.
EOD Code SRL, operator of Slotmonster, engages in problematic practices.
Due to my gambling addiction, I requested a self-exclusion at Slotmonster.com on March 11, 2025, which the operator confirmed and acknowledged.
Despite this, on April 9, 2025, I — on my own initiative and in a vulnerable state — opened a new account simply by using a different email address. This is how I discovered that the operator easily allows the creation of a new account even if a self-exclusion request is already in place.
Here is the pattern I identified:
The account, not the player, is excluded: Only the originally excluded account is disabled. When registering a new account, there is no verification to check whether the player has already requested a self-exclusion. With the same personal details (name, date of birth, etc.), a new account can be easily created — all you need is a different email address.
Unrestricted deposits and play are still possible: Despite the active self-exclusion, I was able to deposit money and gamble again. The operator did not take any effective measures to permanently block excluded players from accessing the site.
Payouts are blocked: Only when a payout request is made does the operator perform a more thorough identity check. If it is then discovered that a self-exclusion is in place, the payout is denied. The previously deposited funds are lost.
One-sided advantage for the operator: This practice allows the operator to continue accepting deposits while refusing to pay out winnings. This approach exploits vulnerable players suffering from gambling addiction.
Conclusion: Based on the current situation, I do not expect to recover my deposited funds, as I technically opened a new account myself. Nevertheless, it is important to raise awareness of this practice, as it clearly violates the principles of responsible gambling and established player protection standards.
I hope this information helps other players to stay cautious.
Automatski prevedeno: