The player from the Netherlands detailed a lengthy history of gambling addiction that began when he was 17, including activities such as bypassing location restrictions and neglecting self-exclusion measures. Despite multiple requests for assistance regarding his gambling-related issues and informing the casino that his gambling had destroyed his life, the casino continued to engage him without providing adequate protection or support. He sought to dispute the negative balance of his withdrawals and deposits or to reach an agreeable amount with the casino. The complaint was rejected as the Complaints Team concluded that without a formal self-exclusion request from the player, they were unable to assist further. The player was advised on how to properly request self-exclusion in the future, and the complaint was closed.
Igrač iz Holandije je detaljno opisao dugu istoriju zavisnosti od kockanja koja je počela kada je imao 17 godina, uključujući aktivnosti kao što su zaobilaženje ograničenja lokacije i zanemarivanje mera samoisključivanja. Uprkos višestrukim zahtevima za pomoć u vezi sa njegovim problemima u vezi sa kockanjem i obaveštavanjem kazina da mu je kockanje uništilo život, kazino je nastavio da ga angažuje bez pružanja adekvatne zaštite ili podrške. Pokušao je da ospori negativan bilans svojih povlačenja i depozita ili da postigne prihvatljiv iznos sa kazinom. Žalba je odbijena pošto je tim za žalbe zaključio da bez zvaničnog zahteva za samoisključenje od igrača, nisu bili u mogućnosti da pomognu dalje. Igrač je savetovan kako da ubuduće pravilno zahteva samoisključivanje, a žalba je zatvorena.