Winning.io se predstavlja kao elegantan, moderan kazino, ali iza uglačanog interfejsa krije se rad koji, po mom iskustvu, pokazuje potpuno nepoštovanje bezbednosti, odgovornosti i etičkog ponašanja igrača.
Ono što mi se dogodilo nije bila mala neprijatnost. Bio je to sistemski kvar. Trajno mi je bio onemogućen da koristim usluge povezane sa Scatters Group. Samo to sugeriše da je neko, negde u tom ekosistemu, odlučio da ne bi trebalo da se kockam.
Ipak, Winning.io, brend javno povezan sa istom grupom, nije imao problema da uzme moj novac.
Bilo mi je dozvoljeno da:
Registrujte se odmah
Uplatite velike sume bez problema
Izgubite ogromne količine u roku od nekoliko sati
Nastavite da igrate bez ikakve intervencije
Ako me je jedna ruka operacije smatrala nebezbednim, zašto je druga ruka iskoristila istu ranjivost?
U veoma kratkom periodu, izgubio sam velike količine novca. Ni u jednom trenutku Winning.io nije: pauzirao moju igru. pokrenuo provere pristupačnosti. ponudio zahteve za razmišljanje. sprovodio ograničenja potrošnje. intervenisao na bilo koji smislen način.
Ovo nije bilo suptilno. Ponašanje je bilo ekstremno, brzo i očigledno — ipak platforma nije ništa uradila.
U regulisanim kazinima, ovakva aktivnost je upozorenje. U Winning.io-u se to ohrabruje.
„Odgovorno kockanje" samo po imenu
Winning.io tehnički možda navodi alate za odgovorno kockanje, ali u praksi su delovali čisto kozmetički.
Odgovornost je u potpunosti stavljena na igrača — dok je kazino primenjivao neumoljive podsticaje da nastavi sa deponovanjem.
To nije zaštita igrača. To je verovatno poricanje.
Prema javno dostupnim informacijama, izvršni direktor kompanije Winning.io je Aleksis Visen.
Ako je to tačno, onda rukovodstvo mora biti odgovorno za sistem koji:
Blokira igrače na jednoj povezanoj usluzi. Usmerava ih ka drugoj. Dozvoljava nekontrolisane gubitke. Ne preduzima nikakve mere da spreči štetu.
Ovo nije tehnički propust. To odražava korporativne prioritete.
Winning.io posluje u inostranstvu i nije licenciran od strane Holandske agencije za kockanje (KSA).
Iz perspektive igrača, ta realnost je bolno očigledna:
Nema smislene obaveze brige
Nema sprovođenja standarda bezbednijeg kockanja
Bez samoisključivanja između brendova
Nema prave odgovornosti kada stvari krenu po zlu
Kada se pojave problemi, igrači su izloženi — finansijski i emocionalno.
Kada sam se obratio, odgovori su bili generički i izbegavajući. Bilo je:
Nema potvrde o prethodnoj blokadi na drugim mestima
Nema brige o obimu ili brzini gubitaka
Bez pokušaja da se pomogne ili zaštiti
Činilo se kao da podrška postoji samo da skrene pažnju, a ne da pomogne.
Po mom mišljenju, Winning.io nije bezbedan kazino, posebno za:
Ranjivi igrači
Svako ko je imao prethodnih problema sa kockanjem
Svako ko očekuje osnovne etičke standarde
Činjenica da me je blokirao jedan povezani entitet, a zatim mi je dozvoljeno da izgubim ogromne sume na Winning.io bez intervencije je, za mene, neodbranjiva.
Winning.io me nije samo izneverio kao kupca — izneverio je na najosnovnijem nivou odgovornosti.
Ovoj platformi ne treba poveravati ničiji novac ili blagostanje.
Ako razmišljate da igrate ovde: nemojte.
Winning.io presents itself as a sleek, modern casino, but behind the polished interface is an operation that in my experience shows complete disregard for player safety, responsibility, and ethical conduct.
What happened to me was not a minor inconvenience. It was a systemic failure. I was permanently blocked from using services connected to Scatters Group. That alone suggests someone, somewhere in that ecosystem decided I should not be gambling.
Yet Winning.io a brand publicly associated with the same group had no problem taking my money.
I was allowed to:
Register instantly
Deposit large sums without friction
Lose massive amounts within hours
Continue playing with zero intervention
If one arm of the operation deemed me unsafe, why did another arm exploit that same vulnerability?
Within a very short period, I lost large amounts of money. At no point did Winning.io: Pause my play. Trigger affordability checks. Offer cooling-off prompts. Enforce spending limits. Intervene in any meaningful way.
This wasn’t subtle. The behaviour was extreme, fast, and obvious — yet the platform did nothing.
At regulated casinos, this kind of activity is a red flag. At Winning.io, it felt encouraged.
"Responsible gambling" in name only
Winning.io may technically list responsible gambling tools, but in practice they felt purely cosmetic.
Responsibility was placed entirely on the player — while the casino applied relentless incentives to keep depositing.
That isn’t player protection. That’s plausible deniability.
According to publicly available information, the CEO of Winning.io is Alexis Wicén.
If that is accurate, then leadership must answer for a system that:
Blocks players on one connected service. Funnels them into another. Allows uncontrolled losses. Takes no action to prevent harm
This is not a technical oversight. It reflects corporate priorities.
Winning.io operates offshore and is not licensed by the Dutch Gambling Authority (KSA).
From a player’s perspective, that reality is painfully obvious:
No meaningful duty of care
No enforcement of safer gambling standards
No cross-brand self-exclusion
No real accountability when things go wrong
When problems arise, players are left exposed — financially and emotionally.
When I reached out, responses were generic and evasive. There was:
No acknowledgment of prior blocking elsewhere
No concern about the scale or speed of losses
No attempt to assist or protect
It felt like support existed only to deflect, not to help.
In my opinion, Winning.io is not a safe casino, especially for:
Vulnerable players
Anyone with prior gambling issues
Anyone expecting basic ethical standards
The fact that I was blocked by one connected entity and then allowed to lose huge sums on Winning.io without intervention is, to me, indefensible.
Winning.io didn’t just fail me as a customer — it failed at the most basic level of responsibility.
This platform should not be trusted with anyone’s money or wellbeing.
If you are considering playing here: don’t.




