Keskustelua artikkelista: Reilun pelin säännöt

Very good excellent

Muy bueno excelente

Do you also believe that it is helpful to others?

The concept of "fair gambling" feels like an intentional oxymoron. Platforms claim transparency, but the underlying mechanics always favor the house. It's a sophisticated psychological dance between player hope and mathematical probability.

As a player, I've been going through a very frustrating situation with a well-known game provider (Pragmatic Play), in which I've gathered a considerable amount of evidence pointing to highly irregular behavior in a live roulette game. However, despite having the evidence in hand—videos, repeated patterns, evasive answers—I've realized something more serious: there's a huge regulatory loophole.

Authorities pass the buck, forums push the strings into hidden categories, and platforms that should protect players are also caught in the crossfire of commercial interests. No one wants to upset the big providers.

This makes me wonder: what good is a "fair play" code if, when a serious irregularity actually occurs, no one takes concrete action? I'd love to believe in this mission of fair and responsible gaming, but for now, what I've experienced shows me that the system is designed to protect operators more than players.

I hope this message doesn't get deleted. I just want it to be known that there are players who have tried to follow the rules, provide evidence, and communicate respectfully… and yet we are completely ignored, simply because we are not a company.

Thanks if anyone manages to read this to the end.

Como jugador, he estado pasando por una situación muy frustrante con un proveedor de juegos bastante conocido (Pragmatic Play), en la que he reunido una cantidad considerable de evidencia que apunta a un comportamiento altamente irregular en una ruleta en vivo. Sin embargo, a pesar de tener las pruebas en las manos ,videos, patrones repetidos, respuestas evasivas, me he dado cuenta de algo más grave: existe un enorme vacío regulatorio.

Las autoridades se pasan la responsabilidad unas a otras, los foros te mueven los hilos a categorías ocultas, y las plataformas que deberían proteger al jugador también están atrapadas entre intereses comerciales. Nadie quiere incomodar a los proveedores grandes.

Esto me hace preguntarme: ¿de qué sirve un código de "juego limpio" si cuando realmente se presenta una irregularidad seria, nadie toma acción concreta? Me encantaría creer en esta misión de juego justo y responsable, pero por ahora, lo que he vivido me muestra que el sistema está hecho para proteger más a los operadores que a los jugadores.

Ojalá este mensaje no se borre. Solo quiero que se sepa que hay jugadores que hemos tratado de seguir las reglas, aportar evidencia y comunicar con respeto… y aún así nos ignoran completamente, simplemente porque no somos una empresa.

Gracias si alguien llega a leer esto hasta el final.

Players always play knowing the house has the advantage. The frustrating thing is when you see something wrong and document it for a couple of months, follow all the protocols, and no one takes you seriously or takes action! Of course, they have to protect their B2B licenses. Regulators protect licenses, not players.

The theory and concept are all right.

Mathematical casino advantage

it's completely legal, it's known for individual games,

and is not dishonest.

But, among the "problematic topics" the article does not name the main ones,

After all, online casinos are dangerous because they can:

- steal a player's deposit when replenishing an account (money,

allegedly, they did not arrive),

- steal the player's money from the account in different ways

ways. For example, by deliberately generating dishonest

results against his bets. Or just block

account and confiscate the money;

- steal a player's money when trying to withdraw it.

All this can happen at any time and at any time.

online casino. Even after a successful game check

for small money, successful verification and withdrawal of winnings.

С теорией в концепции всё в порядке.

Математическое преимущество казино

вполне законно, известно для отдельных игр,

и нечестным не является.

Но, среди "проблемных тем" в статье не названы главные,

ведь онлайн казино опасны тем, что могут:

- украсть депозит игрока при пополнении счёта (деньги,

якобы, не поступили),

- украсть деньги игрока уже со счёта разными

способами. Например, намеренно генерируя нечестные

результаты против его ставок. Или просто заблокировать

аккаунт и конфисковать деньги;

- украсть деньги игрока при попытке их вывода.

Всё это может произойти в любой момент и в любом

онлайн казино. Даже после удачной проверки игрой

на малые деньги, успешной верификации и вывода выигрыша. 

One of the best casino sites in term of bonuses, gits and deposit/withdraw methods!!!

I agree here, the only factors which can be deemed more or less fair are how fast KYC and payments happen and does the casino do responsible gambling to a degree with self exclusion options.

The games all have a house edge by design, else every casino would go bankrupt in very little time. The casinos have a small edge, you can win, but generally, the longer you play, the more it might cost you.

There was a casino once in the 80s , which had a game with 100.3% RTP in Vegas and it went bankrupt very quickly, before they realized, the game had pharao in the name, I forgot.

Nice post , have an upvote.

And that would be?