Connecticut files new lawsuit against prediction market platform Kalshi

• Connecticut is pursuing a legal complaint against Kalshi
• The argument levelled by the state is that Kalshi is offering illegal gambling through its sports event contracts
• Kalshi has vehemently denied this, and argued that it was the latest inconsistent legal action against the platform

The state of Connecticut is once again on the move against Kalshi, with a new lawsuit filed against the popular prediction market platform ahead of the National Football League season.

Connecticut files new complaint against Kalshi

The complaint was filed by the Office of the Attorney General and signed by Attorney General William Tong. It is once again seeking to block Kalshi from offering event contracts featuring sports in the state

The case, Tong argues, is simple enough and already well-established - sports event contracts constitute gambling, but Kalshi is not regulated by the Connecticut gambling regulator.

Therefore, its product is illegal. Kalshi has rebuffed these claims, arguing in turn that it was regulated under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and that, as such, it was not subject to state gaming laws.

In a statement, the AG’s office argued that sports event contracts resemble sports wagers, and that the specifics of each contract hewed too closely to what traditional sportsbooks offer, such as the number of points scored and more.

Bluntly, the statement equated prediction markets in their current forms about sports events to gambling.

"Sports event contracts are no different than sports betting and are not magically shielded by federal law from Connecticut’s commonsense consumer protection laws," Tong added in the statement.

Kalshi is coming under increasing scrutiny across the nation at a time when the CFTC has promised a detailed plan on how to regulate the industry. For its part, Kalshi has replied to the new challenge in Connecticut through a social media post shared on X.

In the post, Jovy Dedaj, the Head of Litigation at Kalshi, presented the company’s defense, arguing that it did not accept Connecticut’s premise in the complaint.

"This is the latest in a line of arbitrary and inconsistent enforcement by the states, which shows this has nothing to do with consumer protection. If it did, the states would be seeking the same relief across the board. This unequal treatment is exactly why federal oversight is necessary," the post read.

Kalshi is already familiar with state challenges

Kalshi has already faced pressure in Connecticut back in December when the state consumer protection agency ordered the platform, along with others, to cease conducting their business in the state, and specifically sports event contracts.

Kalshi hastened at the time and launched a lawsuit against the state once again, insisting that it was only the CFTC that could weigh in on what constituted regulated and unregulated products.

The latest complaint is another challenge to Kalshi’s status and a general hit at the prediction marketvertical. However, just because states are litigating this does not mean that they would be successful.

Image credit: Unsplash.com