Kalshi was teetering on the verge of defeat in Massachusetts on Friday, when Judge Christopher Barry-Smith, who previously seemed to side with the state in its surmise that the prediction market platform was facilitating unauthorized gambling, said that he would need more time to deliberate on the issue, effectively allowing Kalshi to continue running business as usual.
A new date for a meeting has not been set, with Massachusetts now having until January 30 to put forward new arguments, whereas Kalshi would be granted time until February 4 to respond.
This is good news for Kalshi, as it would most likely be able to catch the action associated with one of the biggest sports events in the country - The Super Bowl, or failing that, at least the build-up to the Big Game.
Kalshi has made a solid legal argument, arguing that the injunction sought against it by the Bay State is too broadly defined, and if a court rules in favor of Massachusetts, the business may find itself in trouble offering contracts that would have been otherwise legal.
For example, Massachusetts’ interpretation suggests that some "other events" could also be treated as "sports wagering," thus creating confusion and opening up a path for further litigation.
Kalshi has been arguing a solid case for its prediction market platform, insisting that it does not fit in the purview of state gaming laws because of its license from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Massachusetts, and other states for that matter, however, have maintained that platforms such as Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Polymarket are, in fact, offering a form of unregulated gambling.
Kalshi was also recently targeted in Tennessee. Despite these setbacks, the platform has doubled down on its commitment to argue its case in courts all over the country.
Image credit: Unsplash.com
