Hvala vam što ste mi pružili dodatne informacije i dokaze, timu za podršku Spinarium-a.
Dragi Mihalvime,
Nakon pregleda svih dodatnih informacija i dokaza koji su mi dostavljeni, ovo je bacilo potpuno drugačije svetlo na situaciju.
Iako se generalno kreiranje višestrukih/dupliranih naloga, sve dok igraču nisu pružili nepravednu prednost, po našem mišljenju, ne smatra potpuno validnim razlogom za konfiskaciju dobitaka igrača ako je to jedini razlog za to, međutim, kako se ispostavilo, vaša situacija je mnogo složenija i vi ste više puta prekršili pravilo kazina, a pored toga ste zaista dali obmanjujuće informacije u vezi sa postojanjem ovih dodatnih naloga.
Standardno je pravilo u industriji da svaki igrač može imati samo jedan nalog u svakom kazinu, osim ako nema eksplicitnu dozvolu od kazino tima da kreira još jedan nalog.
Iako razumem da kada doživite niz gubitaka, to može da vas naljuti i da u tom trenutku želite odmah da zatvorite svoj nalog, opcija/alatka za samoisključivanje nije namenjena za upotrebu kada doživite gubitke. Namenjena je da pomogne ljudima ako počnu da osećaju da nisu u stanju da upravljaju svojom igračkom navikom.
Ako je igrač zatražio samoisključenje, veoma je uobičajeno u većini kazina da igraču strogo nije dozvoljeno da otvori drugi nalog. Ako to urade, uprkos tome, nažalost, mogu postojati određene posledice kada se to otkrije.
Pored toga, kao što je već pomenuto, umesto da kontaktirate podršku kazina kako bi vam pružili korake za ponovno otvaranje vašeg originalnog naloga, sami ste odlučili, protiv pravila, da kreirate više drugih naloga. Namerno ste koristili druge imejl adrese i promenili određene lične podatke kako biste prevarili sistem kazina da vas odmah identifikuje kao nekoga ko već ima nalog.
Iako se mogu složiti sa vama da bi sistem kazina mogao biti podešen da detektuje više podataka prilikom registracije naloga, gledajući sve naloge koje ste kreirali, najverovatnije biste ipak prilagodili podatke kako biste mogli da kreirate još jedan nalog. Nije bitno da li su nalozi bili KYC verifikovani; jednostavno ste prekršili pravila kreiranjem i korišćenjem naloga i time namerno izbegli ograničenje samoisključivanja koje ste sebi postavili na svom originalnom nalogu.
Štaviše, nepoznavanje ili „nepoznavanje" pravila kazina nažalost nije valjano opravdanje. Naš centar za rešavanje žalbi funkcioniše na principima pravičnosti i dobre vere i održavamo politiku nulte tolerancije prema svim pokušajima da se to iskoristi.
Uzimajući sve ovo u obzir u ovom konkretnom slučaju, slažem se sa odlukom kazina da ostavi sve vaše račune zatvorenim i da vam ne obrađuje preostala sredstva. Već ste primili prilično značajan iznos, iako niste imali pravo na njega zbog kršenja pravila.
Na osnovu svega gore navedenog, sada sam primoran da zatvorim ovaj ponovo otvoreni slučaj kao Odbijen - Neopravdano .
Mogu vam samo preporučiti da uložite vreme u čitanje, razumevanje i poštovanje pravila kazina. Svako potencijalno kršenje pravila će pre ili kasnije biti otkriveno, a to se često dešava u situaciji kada ćete želeti da podignete dobitke.
Svakako imate pravo da se ne slažete sa ovim zaključkom i možete kontaktirati organ za licenciranje kazina ako smatrate da je vaš stav opravdan; međutim, nismo u mogućnosti da vam pružimo bilo kakvu dalju pomoć.
Ukoliko se u budućnosti suočite sa bilo kakvim problemima sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom, slobodno nas kontaktirajte, a mi ćemo se potruditi da vam pomognemo ako je moguće.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mihal
Kazino Guru
Thank you for providing me with the additional information and evidence, Spinarium Support Team.
Dear michalvym,
After reviewing all the additional information and evidence I was provided, this shed a completely different light on the situation.
While in general the creation of multiple/duplicate accounts, as long as they didn't provide the player with any unfair advantage, is, in our point of view, not considered a fully valid reason for confiscation of the player winnings if this is the sole reason for it, however, as it turned out, your situation is much more complex, and you violated the casino rule on multiple occasions, and on top of that, you indeed provided misleading information regarding the existence of these additional accounts.
It is an industry-standard rule that every player can maintain only one account at each casino unless they explicitly have permission from the casino team to create another account.
While I understand that when you hit a losing streak, it can make you angry, and at that moment, you want to close your account immediately, but the self-exclusion option/tool is not designed to be used when you experience losses. It is designed to help people if they start to feel they are not able to manage their gaming habit.
If a player has requested self-exclusion, it is very common in basically most casinos that the player is strictly not allowed to open another account. If they do that, despite this, unfortunately, there could be certain consequences once this is discovered.
Additionally, as was mentioned, instead of contacting the casino support to provide you with the steps to reopen your original account, you decided, on your own, against the rules, to create multiple other accounts. You intentionally used other email addresses and changed certain personal data to trick the casino system into immediately identifying you as already having an account.
While I can agree with you that the casino system could be set to detect more data when registering an account, looking at all the accounts you created, you would most likely still adjust the data so that you could create another account. It does not really matter if the accounts were KYC verified; you simply violated the rules by creating and using the accounts and thus intentionally avoided the self-exclusion restriction you set for yourself on your original account.
Furthermore, unawareness or "ignorance" of the casino rules is sadly not a valid justification. Our complaint resolution centre operates on principles of fairness and good faith, and we maintain a zero-tolerance policy toward any attempts to exploit it.
Taking all this into consideration in this particular instance, I concur with the casino's decision to leave all your accounts closed and not process any remaining funds to you. You have already received quite a considerable amount, even though you were not really eligible for it because of the rule breaches.
Based on all the abovementioned, I am now forced to close this reopened case as Rejected - Unjustified.
I can only recommend that you invest time in reading, understanding and following the casino rules. Any potential rule violation will sooner or later be discovered, and it quite often is in a situation when you will want to withdraw winnings.
You are certainly entitled to not agree with this conclusion and may contact the casino's licensing authority if you believe you are justified in your position; however, we are not able to provide you with any further assistance.
Should you face any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us, and we will try our best to assist you if possible.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: