Dragi Jdawg1 ,
Hvala vam na pojašnjenju.
Dragi kazino Gamba,
Hvala i vama što ste pružili dokaze. Međutim, kao što sam već napomenuo u svojim odgovorima na vašu e-poštu, materijal koji ste dostavili nije dovoljan da opravda mere preduzete protiv ovog igrača.
Dokazi vezani za navodno kršenje pravila suprotnog klađenja čak ni ne pokazuju dotičnog igrača - ID-ovi igrača se razlikuju od onog koji pripada ovom nalogu. Iako je igrač priznao da je koristio strategiju brojanja karata, nije dostavljen nikakav dokaz koji pokazuje da je igrač koristio bilo kakav dodatni softver ili spoljnu pomoć. Samo takva podrška zasnovana na softveru predstavljala bi ozbiljno kršenje vaših Uslova i odredbi dajući igraču nepravednu prednost.
Iako razumemo da onlajn kazina moraju da se zaštite od igrača koji pokušavaju da steknu prednost brojanjem karata u blekdžeku ili bakaratu, važno je prepoznati da ove tehnike samo minimalno utiču na prednost kuće, mogu se rano identifikovati i efikasno neutralisati (na primer, povećanjem učestalosti mešanja) .
Želeli bismo da vidimo da onlajn kazina tretiraju brojače karata slično kao i kazina na kopnu. U fizičkim kazinima, ako igrač bude uhvaćen kako broji karte, može dobiti upozorenje, biti uklonjen sa stola ili mu biti zabranjen pristup — ali u svim slučajevima mu je dozvoljeno da zadrži svoje žetone. Iz tog razloga, smatramo da otkrivanje strategija brojanja karata generalno ne bi trebalo da bude razlog za poništenje dobitaka, osim ako ne postoje jasni dokazi o igri uz pomoć softvera.
Izgleda da je sumnja provajdera možda bila zasnovana jednostavno na rutinskom pregledu sesija igre u kojima su označeni izolovani obrasci klađenja. Međutim, takvi nalazi sami po sebi ne predstavljaju dokaz da je do kršenja zaista došlo.
S obzirom na ove okolnosti, smatramo da je u ovom slučaju konfiskacija igračevih sredstava bila neopravdana i zasnovana na sumnji, a ne na konkretnim dokazima. Ukoliko se ne dostave dodatni značajni dokazi, pozivamo vas da preispitate svoju odluku i vratite igraču konfiskovane dobitke. Ako želite da zatvorite igračev račun nakon toga, slobodni ste da to učinite, ali tek nakon što su svi zakoniti dobici isplaćeni.
Hvala vam i radujemo se vašem odgovoru.
Dear Jdawg1,
Thank you for your clarification.
Dear Gamba Casino,
Thank you as well for providing the evidence. However, as I have already mentioned in my replies to your email, the material you submitted is not sufficient to justify the actions taken against this player.
The evidence related to the alleged opposite-betting violation does not even show the player in question - the player IDs differ from the one belonging to this account. Although the player admitted using a card-counting strategy, no proof has been provided demonstrating that the player used any additional software or external assistance. Only such software-based support would constitute a serious violation of your Terms & Conditions by giving the player an unfair advantage.
While we understand that online casinos must protect themselves from players attempting to gain an advantage through card counting in Blackjack or Baccarat, it is important to recognize that these techniques only minimally impact the house edge, can be identified early, and can be neutralized effectively (for example, by increasing shuffle frequency).
We would like to see online casinos treat card counters similarly to land-based casinos. In physical casinos, if a player is caught counting cards, they may receive a warning, be removed from the table, or be banned — but in all cases, they are allowed to keep their chips. For this reason, we believe that detecting card-counting strategies should generally not be grounds for voiding winnings, unless there is clear evidence of software-assisted play.
It appears that the provider’s suspicion may have been based simply on a routine review of game sessions in which isolated betting patterns were flagged. However, such findings alone do not constitute proof that a violation actually occurred.
Given these circumstances, we believe that, in this case, the confiscation of the player’s funds was unjustified and based on suspicion rather than concrete evidence. Unless further substantial proof is provided, we urge you to reconsider your decision and return the player’s confiscated winnings. If you wish to close the player’s account afterward, you are free to do so, but only after all rightful winnings have been paid.
Thank you, and we look forward to your response.
Automatski prevedeno: